creationary mosaic

creationary adj. of or relating to or produced by creation: creationary biology; creationary perspective; creationary theorist.
evolutionary adj. of or relating to or produced by evolution: evolutionary biology; evolutionary perspective; evolutionary theorist.

You will find the adjective creationary in the following dictionaries: (1) Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged, 1986; (2) Funk & Wagnalls New Standard Dictionary Of The English Language, 1959; (3) Random House Dictionary Of The English Language, 2nd Edition, Unabridged, 1987; (4) Random House Webster's College Dictionary, 1991.

[In just one tidal breath the Cape Cod shores are both consumed and created; if you observe one tiny grain of quartz sand for time enough, an ancient creationary tale belonging to that geographical space will unfold before you in rhythmic play to the lappings of this sea's currents. (This sentence was written by Danielle Denenny and was taken from "An American Folktale - The day the tide came in but never ran out", which appeared in the Spring '99 issue of The Catalyst, Brown University's one and only interdisciplinary science magazine.)]

[Not long ago, I read the tale of the Hopi "Spider-Woman", an interesting creationary tale indeed. (This sentence was written by Tiassa and was taken from the [www.sciforums.com] religion forum thread entitled "The children of Adam and Eve, why [do they] look so different?")]

[Is your loan new money from a creationary tap or is it depositors' savings. (This sentence was written by John Turmel and was taken from "TURMEL: Social Credit Stream #5 40k".)]

[Similarly, Meritt's ordering of the creationary tasks is based on KJV's simplistic verb tenses. (This sentence was taken from an FAQ that attempts to summarize the contradictions that people often claim are present in the Bible.)]

[The Seventh-day Adventist universities are probably the most common of any Christian schools to incorporate young-earth creationary teaching into their curriculum. (This sentence was taken from a creationary science resource page produced by CSR.)]

[Of course, since this whole writer debate is coming to the surface once again, it's about time I posted my "ideal creationary team" listing...(This sentence was written by Michael Triggs and was taken from the rec.arts.comics.xbooks newsgroup thread "Re: Jeph Loeb...".)]

[Enjoyable life would be possible only if dreamy facilities integrate with creationary technology. (This sentence was taken from a webpage of the Chinese electrical appliance company TROIKA. Troika manufactures small electrical appliances in Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.)]

[Therefore, I consider it inappropriate to use the term "creationary". (This sentence was written by Dutch evolutionist Fedor Steeman, Doctorandus (M.S.), and was taken from his English-language webpage entitled "Submitted Reactions to the 10 main arguments against Creationism".)]

[In creationary terms, the question is practically the same. (This sentence was written by evolutionist Martin Striz and was taken from the post entitled "LS Re: Before Static Quality".)]

[If you would like to know more about how modern creationary systematists think and what creationary terminology they are attempting to develop for their field, then read chapter 24 "Discontinuity Systematics", and chapter 25 "Systematics and the Origins Debate", contained in Walter J. ReMine's excellent book "The Biotic Message". (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Creationary Systematics and Discontinuity Systematics".)]

[Then [Question 4:] won’t you be all too happy to list the creationary texts and journal articles (especially the geology related ones) upon which was based the "thorough and careful study" which has led you to conclude that fossil sorting in the geological strata as a "difficult obstacle" for the creationary paradigm? (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from October 1999".)]

[Where in creationary theology does anyone suggest that the arguments need to be based on the facts (let alone on sound logic)? (This sentence was written by evolutionist Bobby D. Bryant and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: More evolutionary foolishness".)]

[YECs (and others) recognize that a creationary theology automatically leads to a creationary philosophy and paradigm which supplies the necessary presuppositions within which science can be done. (This sentence was written creationist Allen Roy and was taken from the webpage "Re: Post-Empiricism Science: A little surprised". [which was posted to an ASA (American Scientific Affiliation) forum: Wed Sep 17 2003]) (Added 2006.03.02)]

[To use creationary would admit all 'creationary' theologies into the pool which we cast 'creation' arguments. (This sentence was written by evolutionist Mark E. Siddall, Ph.D., and was taken from the bionet.molbio.evolution newsgroup thread [Date: 1997/04/30] "Re: Use the adjective "creationary" if it is useful (revised message).".)]

[Such was the fate of geocentric and creationary theologies of the past which engendered such acrimonious debate but are now relegated to the waste[ ]heap of poor Biblical schol[a]rship and misunderstanding of the true message of Scripture! (This sentence was written by Rev. Harry A. Smith, D.D., Ph.D., D.Min.[FICOTW = First International Church Of The Web], and was taken from the alt.christnet.bible, etc. newsgroups thread ": Re: Bible guidelines for gay sex standards".)]

[Professor Louis Agassiz of Harvard was a creationary theorist who never did accept Darwinism. (This sentence was written by antievolutionist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Book Review - The Creationists ([Ronald] Numbers) ".)]

[If readers would like their minds to be disabused of the many evolutionary illusions that clutter up their "mental space" (these illusions have existed for decades without serious challenge), including the many so-called "evolutionary predictions", then they ought to read creationary theorist Walter J. ReMine's excellent book "The Biotic Message" <http://www1.minn.net/~science>. (This sentence was written by Canadian creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons) and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Evolution: Assorted Flavors".]

[The exclusive presence of marsupials in Australia following the flood, and the fact that numerous marsupial / placental counterparts exist forces the creationary theorist to reach out for a new explanation. (This sentence was written by creationary biologist Chris Ashcraft, B.S. (biology), M.S. (molecular biology), and was taken from the Creation Science Resource website.)]

[Many Creationary theorists agree that even the collapsing of the "water above the firmament" would not cause the catastrophic destruction seen in the geologic record. (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist and creationary catastrophist Allen Roy and was taken from the article "Fountains of the Great Deep: The Primary Cause of the Flood", which was first published in CRSQ, Volume 33, June 1996, pp. 18-22.)]

[On the whole, Creationary theorists have skimmed over this problem. (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Allen Roy and was taken from the article "Fountains of the Great Deep: The Primary Cause of the Flood".)]

[Should evolutionists and creationists, especially evolutionary and creationary theorists, make the adjective creationary a part of their active core vocabulary? (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), and was taken from "Feedback for December 1998", in The Talk.Origins Archive.)]

[For instance, if evolutionary theorists say that "evolution is a fact" and intend by this that "microevolution is a fact", then creationary theorists also accept the "fact of evolution", although they might prefer to call it "microcreation". (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Evolution: Assorted Flavors".)]

[Such data will continue to be of interest to those interested in developing a modern creationary theory of systematics. (This sentence was written by L. James Gibson, Ph.D., Director, Geoscience Research Institute, and was taken from the Origins article "DO DNA DISTANCES REVEAL AVIAN PHYLOGENY?")]

[I believe that more creationists (and evolutionists) ought to read your book, because it is the best modern book that presents a testable creationary theory, 'message theory'. (This sentence was written ancient-creationist by Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), and was taken from The Biotic Message website.)]

[I prefer not to call it creationism but rather prefer creationary theory instead. (This sentence was written on the "MSNBC Science Message Board".)]

[I hear Kentucky recently made creationary theory state law. (This sentence was written by evolutionist Roger Perkins and was taken from the newsgroup post "Re: Sleeping Giant".)]

[In my opinion it is entirely appropriate and more accurate to label Michael Behe and Michael Denton, who both profess to be evolutionists, "intelligent-design evolutionists". If they at some future time say that they now accept creationary theory (e.g., accept the separate ancestry thesis), they could then be relabelled and called "intelligent-design creationists". (These two sentences were written by old-earth creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), and were taken from a post to the Talk.Origins newsgroup.)]

[Creationism: Where's the Theory?—analysis of the vacuous answer of Timothy Wallace that confirms the serious, scientific, (and popular at Talk.Origins) claim that no empirically relevant creationary theory exists. (This sentence was written by anti-creationist John Hoppner and was taken from the Reality.Origin Archive, a proevolutionary, anticreationary website.)]

[As such, I suggest you direct your requests to those individuals you have reason to believe claim that such a big-picture creationary theory can, as of this date, be expressed. (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist David Bradbury and was taken from the post "Subject: Re: [creationevolutiondebate] Non-evolutionary scientists".)]

[Also, it seeks to identify the boundaries between continuity and discontinuity, and requires that this identification be based on the evidence (and not on what macroevolutionary theory or creationary theory claim). (This sentence was written by creationary theorist Walter J. ReMine, MSEE, and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Dandelion nectar".)]

[That is, it offers a creationary theory that explains the major patterns of biology in a testable, scientific manner. (This sentence was written by creationary theorist Walter J. ReMine, MSEE, and was taken from the ARN Design Forum thread entitled "please recommend a book".)]

[Evolutionary theory and creationary theory are both just that, theories, and the same attributes of theories stick to both of them. (This sentence was written by Epoetker and was taken from the ARN Design Forum thread entitled "Laying my Own ID Cards on the Table".)]

[I can't see how this can be true given the[re] is no way to give evidence for or against any creationary theory. (This sentence was written by evolutionist JP and was taken from the ARN Design Forum entitled "Laying my Own ID Cards on the Table".)]

[The reason Mr. Wallace does not provide a more comprehensive and scientifically accurate description of science (See here.) is because, if he were to do so, it would become blatantly obvious that his so-called "creationary theory" is to science what rap is to classical music. (This sentence was written by evolutionist Jack DeBaun, M.S., Ph.D., and was taken from the webpage with the heading "A Response to the new commentary on Mr. Knapp's May 2003 updated website".) (Added 2004.12.22)]

[While he's at it, he could also admit that, since there is no evidence that supernatural explanations have ever been permitted as part of established scientific theories, the miracle-laden "creationary theory" of Wallace does not qualify as legitimate science. (This sentence was written by evolutionist Jack DeBaun, M.S., Ph.D., in a response to creationist Tim Knapp.)]

[(No wonder it is so easy to find those who are gullible enough to fall for Wallace's "creationary theory".) (This sentence was written by Jack DeBaun, M.S., Ph.D., and was taken from the webpage with the heading "A Response to the new commentary on Mr. Knapp's May 2003 updated website".) (Added 2004.12.22)]]

[Studying the nylon bug could prove interesting. It has applications to all sorts of areas of creationary theory. (These sentences were written by creationary blogger "Crevo" and were taken from his "Creationism and Baraminology Research News" blog [written on Thursday, January 05, 2006].) (Added 2006.04.11)]

[Those who mix [the] big bang with the idea of a God are merely trying to reconcile their natural instinctive belief in a creator with the non-creationary theory of scientists who[se] firm conviction leads p[eople] to believe in these theories. (This sentence was posted by Star on 22 May 2001 on the Bangladesh.com Discussion Forum.)]

[The rapid growth of evolutionism forced creationists to branch out in their theories and to search both the Scriptures as the word of God and science as the work of God for views which were more sound than their pre-Darwinian creationary theories that had degenerated during the Dark Ages. Numerous creationary theories were proposed as alternatives to evolution. (These sentences were written by Russell L. Mixter, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology at Wheaton College, and were taken from page 32 of the book Evolution and Christian Thought Today. 1959: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, MI)]

[Indeed, properly constituted creationary theories use the exact same rules and procedures as those used to construct the properly constituted "standard" scientific theories. (This sentence was written by mathematician and creationary theorist Robert A. Herrmann, Ph.D., and was taken from the article "What is Creationary Science?".)]

[Though the controversy over the evolutionary theory has been subject to an extensive debate since the topic first came under study, Mayr contests that scientifically, the debate between evolutionary and creationary theories have hinged, largely in part, to the scientific world's need for factual proof of the existence of an all powerful being that simply "created the world." (This sentence was taken from "An Examination of the Debate Between Creationism and Evolutionism Based on the Argument Presented By Ernst Mayr," by Brian Park.)]

[Introduction to the Evolutionary and Creationary Theories (This phrase was written by young-earth creationist [créationniste de la jeune terre] Laurence Tisdall, M.Sc., and was taken from the "Conferences and debates offered by CSAQ" webpage. CSAQ is the English acronym for "Creation Science Association of Quebec". ASCQ is the French acronym for "Association de Science Créationniste du Québec.)]

[Consistent with early creationary theories like the Great Chain of Being, as well [as] that expressed in classical Hinduist texts, Aurobindo visualized a universal consciousness creating, by a process called involution, successively lower levels of life. (This sentence was written by evolutionist Andrew P. Smith and was taken from chapter 12 - "The Blind Watch's Maker?", of his online book WORLDS WITHIN WORLDS - The Holarchy of Life.)]

[Point: lack of creationary theories in ST could be perc[ei]ved as religious sup[p]ression. (This sentence was written by evolutionist Nathaniel Wilde and was taken from the newsgroup thread "Re: Star Trek is communist".)]

[If the historical claims attributed to evolutionary theory are deemed "scientific" by the evolutionist establishment, creationists are quick to point out that the historical claims attributed to the many creationary theories are just as scientific. (This sentence was written by Epoetker and was taken from the ARN Design Forum thread entitled "Laying my Own ID Cards on the Table".) ]

[Actually, many of the various creationary theories are easily falsifiable, such as those dealing with questions such as: "Exactly how did this flood occur?" (This sentence was written by Epoetker and was taken the ARN Design Forum entitled "Laying my Own ID Cards on the Table".)]

[There are certainly natural variations taking place - but variation is common to creationary and evolutionary theories. (This sentence was written by British young-earth creationist David J. Tyler, Ph.D., and was taken from the thread "Re: Robert Matthews on the Peppered Moth".)]

[Although only creationary theories are explicitly religious, all origins theories (including design and natural evolution) have religious implications. (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Craig Rusbult, Ph.D., and was taken from his paper entitled "The Process of Logically Evaluating Theories about Origins".)]

[If you look at the evolutionary and the creationary theories you will see that it is impossible to "prove" either one of them. (This sentence was taken from the electronic bill board BWMS [BackWater Message System].)]

[In a common cultural stereotype, there is one Judeo-Christian theory of creation. In reality, four basic creationary theories are compatible with a basic Judeo-Christian doctrine of theistic creation: (These words were written by old-earth progressive creationist Craig Rusbult, Ph.D., and were taken from the webpage "Origins Overviews".)] (Added 2003.09.29)

[This table illustrates the value of precise definitions -- for the four types of evolution (the four theory components) and the three modern creationary theories -- in understanding the components that each theory includes and excludes). (This sentence was written by creationist Craig Rusbult, Ph.D., and was taken from the webpage "Origins Questions for Science and Theology: An Introductory Summary".)] (Added 2003.09.29)

[In both these situations the Bible gives no clues as to what happened next, the only thing[ ] we know is that it wasn't immaculate nor creationary. (This sentence was written by Satanist Vexen Crabtree and was taken from "Refuting Christianity".)]

[In that case, your position *isn't* falsifiable. There is no evidence whatsoever which can, even in principle, falsify the proposition that a "mindful intelligence" created life, for the simple reason that a sufficiently clever "mindful intelligence" could, for whatever ineffable reasons of its own, cho[o]se to do its creationary thing in such a manner that the end results are *absolutely indistingushable* from the results of a suitable "mindless" process. (This sentence was written [2003-11-18] by Cubist and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Not a Disproof of Pitman's ID Theory".) (Added 2003.12.07)]

[I haven't gotten jack for layouts, which surprises me considering the number of people I've done vs. stuff with, as well as other creationary things. (This sentence was written by a bisexual woman named Sidney Ann and was taken from her www.sabotaged.net website.)]

["Living fossils," their counterparts in the geologic record and the paleoenvironments that they were supposed to have inhabited, are very important to an understanding of creationary thinking. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Raymond Strom and was taken from the article "Fossils — Missing, Missing, Missing", in the creationary newsletter Creation Matters.)]

[Often what scientists espouse as being strong evidence for evolution also can fit in creationary thinking as well! (This sentence was written by creationary biologist Mike Brown, Ph.D., and was taken from the article "Pseudogenes: a Description of the Problem".)]

[Dr Paul Willis, paleontologist and former winner of the Skeptic of the Year award, was keen to debate a creationist and 'knock holes' in creationary thinking. (This sentence was taken from a webpage entitled: "Skeptic vs creationist: 'The Great Genesis Debate' of 2003" by Michael Matthews, AIG–US) (Added 2004.06.19)]

[Anticreationists who claim that creationists reject plate tectonics or an original supercontinent are simply not up to date with creationary thinking. (This sentence was taken from the CreationWiki webpage entitled "Sceptic arguments".) (Added 2006.04.01)]

[There is no conflict of science with creationary thought. (This sentence was taken from the webpage entitled "Materialistic Science is Nonsense".)]

[Some of the most vocal opponents of creationary thought, ostensibly repulsed by the work involved in objectively studying the technical details of an unfamiliar matter, persist in demanding something like a one- or two-sentence "theory of creation" [preferrably subservient to their naturalistic presuppositions]. (This sentence was written by creationary writer Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the article "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[Creationary thought also stoutly supports the notion of "fixed kinds". (This sentence was written by evolutionist Steve Geller and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Transitional Fossils *M.I.A.*".)]

[After rather a lot on Morris, (who AFAIK is not a spokesperson for Creationary thought - in fact I don't think there is a spokesperson or people), Lenny [Frank] names six or seven people, including St Augustine, and interestingly enough St Augustine is quoted in very modern language although there is no note to say it is paraphrased, who support the view that evolution is not a block to a person[']s Christian faith. (This sentence was written by creationist AJS [Stantons] and was taken from a Talk.Origins thread "Re: Announcement -- New Creation[ary] Science FAQ"

[Most Creationists have viewed the fixity of species to be a central pillar of creationary thought. (This sentence was written by creationary biologist Mike Brown, Ph.D., and was taken from his opinion page with the heading "Biological Revolution".)]

[It does not determine how or what we do with our < creationary time> in life, but simply provides some sort of background-noise, a factor that often has little effect on a person's conscious actions. (This sentence was written by Clay and was taken from a rec.music.phish newsgroup thread with the "Subject: Sex/Phish".)]

[If we concede that the appearance of Shaman art occurred in an instant on an evolutionary time scale, how long did it take on a special creationary time scale? (This sentence was written by evolutionist Brian D. Harper and was taken from the post "Re: Shaman art".)

[Our creationary time scale would be different … 40 days and 40 nights, to be exact. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Dr. Glenn Jackson and was taken from the article entitled "POINTS OF ORIGINS: John Baumgardner".)]

[And where did creationists "[choose] their date" for it, other than a reference to "a few thousand years at most" (which is a very broad range on a creationary time scale)? (These words were written by young-earth creationist [jonge-aarde creationist] Philip J. Rayment and were taken from the pharyngula.org website.) (Added 2006.04.13)]

[Much like Macromedia, they're heavily integrated with their creationary tool, which is essentially a behavioural editor. (This sentence was written by Orf on Mar. 12, 2002 and was taken from the webpage entitled "WildTangent Developer Forums powered by Ikonboard".)]

[Evidence (how about a[n] artifact spaceship with creationary tools inside, or maybe some hieroglyphics telling us how they created) that such beings were about the earth circa 3.5 billion years ago. (This sentence was written by JP and was taken from the ARN Design Forum thread entitled "Evidence of Design?".)]

[These folks sell books and videos, give seminars, have a radio program, and publish a newsletter on dozens of creationary topics. (This sentence was written by creationist Dan Reynolds, Ph.D., and was taken from his young-earth creationary website Creationism Connection.)]

[Search For Truth - question[s] and answers on [a] wide variety of creationary topics (The ARK Foundation). (This phrase was taken from a webpage with the heading "Questions, Answers, and Articles about Creation".)]

[Grand Canyon Creationary Tour (This link heading was taken from a website of creationary geneticist Lane Lester, Ph.D., entitled "Links to Interesting Sites on the World Wide Web".)]

[Another Viewpoint - Creationary tours of the Grand Canyon by Allen Roy. (This phrase was taken from the webpage entitled "Adventist Internet Resources: Thought and Writings: Science and Religion".)]

[Grand Canyon Creationary Tours (This phrase was taken from the "Ultimate Christian Resource" website.)]

[Furthermore, the combination of your false assumption, the series of questions with which you follow your invalid argument, and your earlier claim that it is a topic which creationists "ignore or treat scant[i]ly," all serve to betray once and for all as utterly false your claim to have conducted a "thorough and careful study" of the creationary treatment of the topic of fossil sorting in the geological strata. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from October 1999".)]

[In what specific creationary treatments of this topic have you seen fossil sorting in the geological strata described as a "difficult obstacle"? (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from October 1999".)]

[But I will provide a list of those books and articles which I own, and I’ll do my best to remember several other "creationary treatments" which I have read but do not presently possess. I mean, the creationary treatments which I profess to own or have read. (These sentences were written by evolutionist (and former creationist) Chris Jackson and were taken from the webpage "Feedback from October 1999".)]

[You can't teach an old creationist dog new creationary tricks, or can you? (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons).)]

[Creation Gospel By Buddy Davis - Young age creationary tunes by our foremost dino sculptor. [Recommended by EdenNod , 20/06/2002] (These words were taken from an http://groups.msn.com/talkorigins/ webpage.) (Added 2003.09.25)]

[The Creationary type is a wild card insofar as attraction is concerned. The Creationary type body in our Solar System is the Sun. (These sentences were taken from the webpage entitled "CREATIONAL BODY TYPES".]

[Way to go, Moderators and Creationary types! (This sentence was written by Darshan Grayeyes and was taken from the post "Encyclopaedia Arcadia: Two Thumbs Way Up!".)]