creationary mosaic

creationary adj. of or relating to or produced by creation: creationary biology; creationary perspective; creationary theorist.
evolutionary adj. of or relating to or produced by evolution: evolutionary biology; evolutionary perspective; evolutionary theorist.

You will find the adjective creationary in the following dictionaries: (1) Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged, 1986; (2) Funk & Wagnalls New Standard Dictionary Of The English Language, 1959; (3) Random House Dictionary Of The English Language, 2nd Edition, Unabridged, 1987; (4) Random House Webster's College Dictionary, 1991.

[The acid malice burns, coursing through your veins Engulfing sinew in creationary pain (This sentence was written by Ty Pierce, as part of the lyrics of the song "Mechanized Attack", on Gravity 44’s new release, A Further Iteration.)]

[I simply pointed him to Bergman's article, so he could at least familiarize himself with at least one creationary paper on the topic. (This sentence was written by American young-earth creationist [amerikansk ung-ord kreasjonist] Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Information on ATP synthase (long)".)]

[And I note that you used the term "''mainstream'' peer-reviewed scientific journals". Presumably because "mainstream" equals "evolutionary" and there are non-mainstream peer-reviewed scientific journals that do publish creationary papers. (These sentences were written by Australian young-earth creationist [australsk ung-ord kreasjonist] Philip J. Rayment and were taken from a "Creation-evolution_controversy/archive_4" webpage at http://www.gateserver.net/.) (Added 2006.04.13)]

[My paper's readers cannot tell my background, since my paper is neither creationary, nor anti-evolutionary. Rather, my paper is a neutral, inoffensive, clarification of the cost concept, and operates like putting on a clean, clear, pair of glasses. (These sentences were written by Intelligent Design theorist Walter J. ReMine, MSEE, and were taken from the webpage entitled "Comments on Felsenstein's review".) (Added 2006.05.19)]

[Table 2 (below) highlights a series of fundamental components of biblical young-earth creationism, providing a basic rendering of the creationary paradigm. (This sentence was written by Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the creationary article "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[Each of the following books offers a fairly balanced presentation of at least some aspect of the creationary paradigm, or model, of origins. (This sentence was written by Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the article "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[Some advocates of evolutionism have also assumed a right to reject the creationary paradigm because it does not explain in detail exactly how (in scientific terms comprehensible to the mind of man) the Creator performed the act of creation. (This sentence was written by anti-evolutionist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from his article "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[The very nature of the creationary paradigm precludes man, as a created being, from any right or entitlement to exhaustive knowledge of the Creator's ways or means. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from his article "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[So I will spend my time working within the creationary paradigm to see if an explanation is possible using its set of rules. (This sentence was written by creationary biologist Michael Brown, Ph.D., and was taken from the article "Pseudogenes: a Description of the Problem".)]

[Whether you wish to accept the fact or not, there are scientists who subscribe to the evolutionary paradigm, and there are scientists who subscribe to the creationary paradigm (I just cited two examples of the latter above, and there are thousands of others). (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from "Subject: Re: TrueOrigin Feedback Response".)]

[On the other hand, an example of a distinctively less-than-credible organization is the so-called "National Center for Science Education" whose whole agenda is fostering evolutionism and not only opposing the idea of a creationary paradigm, but entering heavily into the arena of philosophy and religion, openly criticizing doctrines of biblical Christianity. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[In any case you asked, in essence, how the empirical data of science better fit the creationary paradigm than the evolutionary paradigm. (This sentence was written by creationary writer Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[Both their Creation Research Society Quarterly (CRSQ), and the Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal (CENTJ), published by Answers in Genesis, are peer-reviewed journals devoted to relating the empirical data to the creationary paradigm. (This sentence was written by young-universe creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[Yet when the creationary paradigm, while interpreting the same empirical data as the evolutionary paradigm, happens to render more credibile the most comprehensive explanation for both the empirical and the non-empirical aspects of human experience, evolutionists hasten to throw it all out, citing the 'non-empirical' implications as somehow invalidating the empirical interpretations. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[It is an error to assume that the creationary paradigm is the same thing as "trying to 'prove' God with science". (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[The resulting implications that the biblical record is accurate, and that (therefore) the God who reveals Himself in the context of that record is truly who He claims to be, do not invalidate the empirical interpretation side of the creationary paradigm any more than the largely anti-biblical implications of the evolutionary paradigm ipso facto invalidate it. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[It requires the use of an unmitigated double-standard to reject the creationary paradigm on such grounds, when we conduct our lives according to non-empirically determined data every day. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[Your ignorance of the biblical creationary paradigm has begun to be revealed here. (This sentence was written by young-universe creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[An entomologist who subscribes to the biblical creationary paradigm asks the same questions that you ask (i.e., "Why do they have so many more females than males?"). (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[Do you think that the creationary paradigm rules out genetics? (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[How exactly does your hypothesis ("the sex ratio is skewed because sisters (the workers) favor production of genetically-similar sisters over less genetically similar brothers") substantiate your predisposition towards Darwinism and against the creationary paradigm? What exactly is it about the creationary parardigm that is negated or challenged by the hypothesis? (These two sentences were written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and were taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[How are your end results better explained through the evolutionary paradigm than the creationary paradigm? (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[This is another fallacious caricature of [the] creationary paradigm. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[Creationists readily admit that they examine the evidence in light of the creationary paradigm. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[To test it even further, you could ask what exactly it is about natural selection that disqualifies it from fitting the creationary paradigm? (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[And it's not easy to read much [Duane T.] Gish or [Henry M.] Morris without getting a fair picture of the creationary paradigm. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[The creationary paradigm operates in the same way—questions abound (that's where CRSQ and CENTJ come in). (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[You may still choose to subscribe to the evolutionary paradigm, but you would at least appreciate the creationary paradigm for something besides the popular caricature that many scientists are persuaded it is. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[You began by making unsubstantiated claims about science and the supernatural, splattered sarcastic derision on a caricature of creationism, rejected pointed criticism of these practices, and then confessed to having "no idea" of what the creationary paradigm is, yet claimed to have at least read [Henry M.] Morris and [Duane T.] Gish. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[On the contrary, neither the creationary model nor the evolutionary model is on record as actually predicting what genetics would reveal about informational similarities, but nothing inherent in the creationary model would make such a genetic similarity greatly surprising, considering that both creatures are fully mammals. Genetics, remember, is not the product or property of evolutionary thought, but was fathered by Gregor Mendel, who subscribed to the biblical worldview, and has done more to corroborate the creationary paradigm than its evolutionary counterpart. (These sentences were written [Date Posted: 8/1/2002] by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and were taken from the Jedi Council Forums, "Topic: Evolution".)]

[Let the creationary paradigmists build their Noachian barge, light it with fireflies (and hope they don't croak in the methane-rich arkian atmosphere), fill it with composting earthworms and animals trained to poop into buckets on command [Why haven't the circuses of the world learned this trick and eliminated their shoveling clowns? Guess they haven't read Woodmorappe's opus], and all the other foolishness in the book. (This sentence was written by atheistic evolutionist F. C. Kuechmann and was taken from the [North Texas Skeptics'] Skeptical News for 19 January 2003.) (Added 2003.10.08)]

[A lot of dancers drifted away from using them in the eighties and nineties, but it is coming back as a sign of an accomplished dancer now. There's no type of dancing analogous to belly dance in Spain, but for the heartbeat, the verve or flavor you might try flamenco. Different moves, but the creationary passion is there. (These words are taken from "Belly Dancing Chat By Mina" [from a Deaf Pagan Network webpage].)] (Added 2003.09.11)

[While standing firmly on the creationary path, DeYoung encourages his readers to consider an alternative perpective when thinking about dinosaurs. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist [ung-jord kreasjonist] Daniel Schobert in his book review of Dr. Donald DeYoung's book Dinosaurs and Creation, and was taken from the ETCSA (East Tennessee Creation Science Association) October 2000 newsletter (Volume 2, Issue 10).)]

[Lucifer knew the creationary pattern, the merkaba, but it was originally intended to be enacted only internally. (This sentence was written by Bob Frissell and was taken from the webpage entitled "Drunvalo: Our History and the 1972 Sirian Experiment".)]

[Two of the most common are the Creationary and the Evolutionary pentagrams. (This sentence was written by pagan evolutionists Marianne and John Bjelke and was taken from the online article "Working With The Pentagram".)]

[In the Creationary pentagram, Spirit feeds Fire like lightning from the hand of the Divine Creator. (This sentence was written by pagan evolutionists Marianne and John Bjelke and was taken from the online article "Working With The Pentagram".)]

[The Creationary pentagram is the most common system found in popular introductory books on the Craft. (This sentence was written by pagan evolutionists Marianne and John Bjelke and was taken from the online article "Working With The Pentagram".)]

[The pinnacle of creationary perfection dwelt with us once to cast His shadow into history and [the] future that all in His shadow be perfected through Him. (This sentence was taken from the thread with the subject "Re: What? Mohammed is Jesus again??? Re: Who will accept the new garbage?".)]

[We have travelled from the creationary period of the 1999 South Saskatchewan Writing Project, through the submission of a grant proposal to the Dr. Stirling McDowell Foundation, to the place we are today, a report complete, a road untravelled in wait. (This sentence was taken from "RESEARCH REPORT: Writing Our Way: Narrative Inquiry and a Teaching, Writing Life", by Lace Marie Brogden, Myra Froc, Laureen (Laurie) Hudyma, Gillian Lawson, Cheryl Mantei, and Joan Sabo [Project #68, October 2001].)]

[They obviously care more about bashing the creationary perspective than scientific accuracy. (This sentence was written by creationary scientist Jonathan D. Sarfati, Ph.D., and was taken from his article "Problems with a Global Flood?".)]

[These pages/sites were developed by a multidisciplinary group of people and provide a good overall introduction to the Creationary perspective. (This sentence was taken from the "Grace Church of Pleasanton" website.)]

[From a creationary perspective, both present organisms and the ecology they depend upon are degenerate. (This sentence was written by Henry Zuill (Retired), Professor of Biology, Union College, and was taken from the article "Evidence For Design At The Ecological Level", which appeared in Geoscience Reports 29:1-6 (Spring 2000).)]

[From a creationary perspective such distinct extinct life forms were unique, unrelated creatures. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Eric J. Blievernicht, B.Sc., and was taken from the "Creation Resource Sheet - TRANSITION[AL] FOSSILS?", located on The Revolution Against Evolution website.)]

[DeYoung lets his readers[ ] know up front in the introduction[ ] that this 120 page book presents dinosaur material from the creationary perspective. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Dan Schobert in his book review of Dr. Donald DeYoung's book Dinosaurs and Creation, and was taken from the ETCSA (East Tennessee Creation Science Association) October 2000 newsletter (Volume 2, Issue 10).)]

[I read material from an evolutionary perspective before reading the creationary [perspective]. (This sentence was taken from an AOL Hometown page entitled "Wcastii Mind Upheaval Page".)]

[Therefore any creationary perspective must be wrong; at least incorrect. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Dan Schobert in his review of Cornelius G. Hunter's book Darwin's God: Evolution and the Problem of Evil.)]

[Genetics and Molecular Evolution from the Creationary Perspective (The link with this heading was one of the search results obtained from the CSR Creation Science Resource site when creationary was used as the keyword in the search. Young-earth creationary biologist Chris Ashcraft, B.S. (biology), M.S. (moleculary biology), designs, writes, and maintains this website.)]

[Although some Christian schools, and Creation Science organizations offer Courses in natural sciences from the Creationary perspective, there are a very limited number of them available in the U.S. and abroad. (This sentence was written by young-universe creationist Chris Ashcraft, B.S., M.S. and was taken from the CSR webpage entitled "Educational Resources in Creation[ary] Science".)]

[Lubenow, Marvin: Bones of Contention. (Paleoanthropologist) Discusses fossil hominid discoveries from a creationary perspective. (These words were written by young-earth creationist Eric J. Blievernicht, B.Sc., and were taken from a Creation[ary] Resource Sheet on The Revolution Against Evolution website.)]

[From the creationary perspective, these birds lived at the same time and died in the same global flood at almost the same time—within hours or days of each other. (This sentence was taken from the article "Archaeopteryx—The Trump Card of Evolution", by young-earth creationist Jon Covey, B.A., MT (ASCP).)]

[From the Creationary perspective, the factor that allows for the presence of residual C-14 in organic fossils, is the recent aspect of its burial in the Creation/Global Flood model. (This sentence was written by creationary biologist Mike Brown, Ph.D., and was taken from the webpage "Carbon 14 Dating: Can dates fit 6000 year scenario?".)]

[This being the case, anyone with a young-earth creationary (YEC) perspective may not enjoy this book as much as one might expect. It is necessary to note, in defense of Strobel, that the work can be viewed as an introduction to ideas that many in the sciences, especially evolutionary science, may have trouble accepting. (These sentences were written by short-age creationist Dan Schobert and were taken from his review of the book: "The Case for a Creator: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God" by Lee Strobel. This review appeared in the creationary newsletter Creation Matters [Volume 9, Number 3 ; May/June 2004]) (Added 2005.07.16)]

[Creationary Perspectives on Dino Evolution or Extinction (This phrase was written by young-earth creationist Chris Ashcraft, M.S., and was taken from a Creation Science Resource webpage.)]

[They are not idiots, and I know you aren't either[](my personal opinion is "willfully ignorant," a quality shared by many of both an evolutionary and creationary persuasion I have talked to) so if you have constructive criticisms of Dembski that go beyond the equivocal, feel free to make them. (This sentence was written by Epoetker and was taken from the ARN Design Forum thread entitled "Do the calculation".)]

[Get in now while we're still in the creationary phase and put in your own $.02 about how the future will be! (This sentence was taken from a "SETI@home The Search for Exraterrestrial Intelligence" webpage entitled "JaMUD".)]

[Many of the crew share common beliefs in the creation of life in the galaxy, and they all revolve in some way around an explosive creationary phase at the dawn of time. (This sentence was taken from "The Apparatus Directive - A Tale from the Great Divide".)]

[ [Y]ou can choose the evolutionary philosophy or you can choose the creationary philosophy...or if you desire to be intellectually bankrupt, at least in this regard, you may also choose to try and maintain both in spite of the vast and insurmountable conflict and hypocrisy [.] (This sentence was written [30 Jul 2001] by young-earth creationist Anyman and was taken from the post "no egg in your [Caesar]...".)]

[YECs (and others) recognize that a creationary theology automatically leads to a creationary philosophy and paradigm which supplies the necessary presuppositions within which science can be done. (This sentence was written by creationist Allen Roy and was taken from the webpage "Re: Post-Empiricism Science: A little surprised". [which was posted to an ASA (American Scientific Affiliation) forum: Wed Sep 17 2003]) (Added 2006.03.02)]

[Conferences or single lectures are frequently sponsored by churches or local groups, and they may serve as the best layman introduction to creationary philosophy. (This sentence was taken from a CSR web page with the caption "Conferences & Meetings".)]

[However, understood within the context of the pro-death anti-creationary philosophy that they tend to adhere to the phenomenon is then understandable. (This sentence was written by Madeline Michele and was taken from the rec.scouting.issues, etc. thread "Re: How fag 'activists' intend to capture the next generation".)]

[We did a whole a capella concert with several Copland pieces (his Four Motets, and that wonderful creationary piece, In the Beginning) and a funky Carter piece called Emblems. (This sentence was written by Jeffrey J. Foley and was taken from "What's New with Jeff? - November 4, 2000.".)]

[Because piggy banks need deposits before they make loans and if you want your creationary bank to look like a non-creationary piggy bank, you make up a rule that says "NO LOANS FROM THE TAP UNTIL SOMEONE DEPOSITS TO THE RESERVOIR" so everyone thinks they're getting the deposit to the reservoir. (This sentence was written by John Turmel and was taken from the webpage "TURMEL: Social Credit Stream #4 45k - Subject: Re: TURMEL: On Social Credit".)]

[These principles of truth have their foundation in the government of heaven, and God incorporated these into His creationary plan for this earth. (This sentence was taken from an anti-triunitarian online booklet entitled "LET THERE BE LIGHT".)]

[I[f] evolution doesn't jibe with the parents' belief[]s, then that kid needs to go to a different (private) school (as you sug[]gest) or [it ought to] be explained (by the parents) that 'evolution is part of God's creationary (new word!!) plan.' (This sentence was written by James D. Speese and was taken from the alt.music.pink-floyd newsgroup thread "Re: NPFR - Teacher banned for saying there's no Santa".)]

Wouldn't notions of "creationary plans," "spiritual ascension," or for that matter, "evolution," also exist in this realm of concept? (This sentence was written by writer Jensen Ruehle and was taken from the webpage entitled "Man & beast".)]

[And getting from that creationary point the Theory of The Big Bang indicates to conditions in which one cell could accidentally just happen by a natural accident eat up even more time. (This sentence was written by creationist Christopher J. Watson and was taken from the thread "Re: Creation vs evolution".)]

[This is why matters of origins (whether from a creationary or evolutionary point of view) cannot be 'proven' scientifically—they are a matter of history, and you cannot effectively observe, repeat, or measure the past. (This sentence was written by young-universe creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[I may be able to find and forward to you some articles or papers in response to your questions from a creationary point of view. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[This article is written to focus on some of the most important aspects of understanding biology from a creationary point of view. (This sentence was written by young-age creationist Wayne Spencer, M.S., of Creation Education Materials and was taken from an article entitled "Introduction to Creation Biology".)]

[Letz, J.: Pneumatological and Ontological Interpretation of the Essential and Responsible Freedom Seen from the Creationary and Evolutionary Point of View [kreačná, kreačne, kreačné, kreačného, kreačnej, kreačnému, kreačno-, kreačnom, kreačnou, kreačnú, kreačný, kreačných, kreačným, kreačnými ][TEST EVOLUCIONIZMU] (This is the title of a paper by Jan Letz which appeared in the Slovak journal Filozofia (Volume 1999).)]

[The common claim of Darwinian fundamentalists that teaching science from a creationary point of view will harm students is false. (This sentence was written by Eric J. Blievernicht, B.Sc., and was taken from his article "Darwinian Fundamentalism: Impact on Law and Science".)]

[He has undoubtedly persuaded a number of people to change from the evolutionary point of view to a creationary point of view. (This sentence was written by young-age creationist Wayne Spencer, M.S., and was taken from the article entitled "Creationism and the Paluxy Controversy".)]

[Your claim that scientists are [a] target for creationary polemics is also questionable. (This sentence was written by theistic evolutionist Lucas Johnson and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Methodological Naturalism, for Tim Wallace et al.".)]

[I was steeped in creationary polemics probably more than even you were. (This sentence was written by creationary evolutionist Lucas Johnson and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Methodological Naturalism, for Tim Wallace et al.".)]

[[A]nd thus two great societies were created, one with all the grand[eu]r and debauchery of male progressive creationary politics; the other guided by the motherly instincts and back-biting bitchery of the great circle of women. (This was written by Markus Jerome and was taken from his "Random Thoughts Archive" [May 9, 2001]).]

[This popular caricature of the creationary position misses the boat entirely. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the webpage "Feedback from August 1999".)]

[I've no particular axe to grind except a firm conviction that the YEC [Young Earth Creationary] position undermines the whole Christian message and puts people off. (This sentence was written by John Collins [Timothy Wallace, MCSD, added the words "Young Earth Creationary"] and was taken from the webpage entitled "Feedback from May-June 1999".)]

[Much of the controversy has resulted from failed attempts to get special creationists to provide a testable theory, as opposed to a vague anti-evolutionary "creationary position." (This sentence was written by evolutionist Zeus Thibault and was taken from a post to the Talk.Origins newsgroup thread entitled "Re: TrueOrigin's "Theory of Creation" article (Part I)".) ]

[With a few notable exceptions, the majority of T.O.'s participants can't be depended upon for much more than the derisive mockery of ignorance-based, caricatured "straw-man" representations of the creationary position, for which they feign an interest in "debating." (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Theory of Creation posted at TrueOrigin".)]

[You should be able to cite cases in which the evolutionary position could have been falsified, but in fact was not - and cases in which the creationary position could have been falsified, and *was*. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: debate challenge".)]

[Roughly half (often considered to be the "more educated half") of the public accepts the evoluionary position and the other half (supposedly the "less educated half") accepts the creationary position. (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), and was taken from the Talk.Origin thread "Re: Cabbages and Humans".) ]

[My thought-experiment concerning justnowism shows that the creationary position cannot rationally place a starting point at any particualar time in the past. (This sentence was written by atheistic evolutionist Jim Sarbeck and was taken from the alt.atheism thread "Re: Justnowism (Was: Re: Creationary And Evolutionary Are Corresponding Adjectives".) ]

[It is not possible to rout the evolutionary position—if for no other reason than the sheer number of evolutionary scientists there are in the world—but it would be possible to present a reasonable creationary position. (This sentence was written by creationary paleontologist Kurt P. Wise, Ph.D., and first appeared in his article entitled "The Science Played Again", Impact: The Scopes Trial, William Jennings Bryan, And Issues That Keep Revolving (Richard M. Cornelius and Tom Davis (eds.) 91-102 (2000), and this quoted sentence was taken from the online article entitled "Darwinism And The Law: Can Non-Naturalistic Scientific Theories Survive Constitutional Challenge", written by H. Wayne House, J.D., Th.D., which appeared in the Regent University Law Review [Vol. 12:1].) ]

[Those who hold a creationary position different from that presented in this article are welcome to submit material to be considered for publication, either as an article or letter to the editor.(This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Glen W. Wolfrom, Ph.D., general editor of Creation Matters and appeared on page one of Volume 7, Number 3, July/August/September 2002.) (Added 2004.06.27)]

[Recent revelations in the journal Science (Schweitzer, 2005) seem to vindicate the creationary position which I had espoused (that dinosaur bones can still have original protein), and show the evolutionary position (that dinosaur bones can have no original materials present due to their supposed millions-of-years antiquity) to be flawed. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationary writer Paul G. Humber and taken from the Creation Matters (Volume 10, Number 2 - March/April 2005) article entitled "Evolution Fails Predictability - Creation Passes".)]

[One can take an anticreationary or procreationary position (likewise an antievolutionary or proevolutionary position) without necessarily being nasty and using ad hominem arguments. (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), and was taken from a guestbook entry.)]

[The heightened creationary possibilities of this "mythic present" (5) allow for an elevated consciousness and empower reconceptualizations of the self, permitting the possibility of self-reliance. (This sentence was taken from an online essay entitled "The Revolution of Self-Reliance".)]

[Four Creationary Possibilit[i]es concerning the above include that craters are primordial (dating from the creation week), craters were introduced at the fall, craters were caused by later catastrophes, for example Noah's Flood, and or some mixture of the above. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Mark Stewart and was taken from his "Review of 2001 Creation Conference. August 30 - September 3, 2001 (unpublished)".)]

[pro[ ]bably too many reasonable anti-evolutionary and pro-creationary posts... (This phrase was written by Dale (on Feb 01, 2001) and was taken from a newsgroup thread entitled "Re: Missing posts".)]

[The creationary postulate that the ultimate Primal Cause of time, space, and matter/energy was the Creator-God of the Bible is not empirically falsifiable, although evidence does point to a beginning of time, space, and matter/energy. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from his article entitled "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[The creationary postulate that complexity, variety and adaptability in living organisms and ecological systems are potentially inherent and complete in original populations as created and manifested over time through genetic variation and natural selection would be falsified by the demonstration that natural processes alone are unequivocally capable of producing these phenomena, were such a demonstration possible. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from his article entitled "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[The creationary postulate that massive amounts of coded genetic information were inherent and complete in the original populations as created, and that the sum total has steadily declined over time via mutational degradation would be falsified by the demonstration of an unequivocal, empirically verifiable increase in new genetic information over time. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from his article entitled "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[The creationary postulate that the fossil record, comprised of billions of organisms quickly buried in sedimentary rock layers laid down by water all over the earth, is a product of the biblical global Flood and its immediate aftermath has not been falsified. (This sentence was written by creationist Timothy Wallace, MCSD, and was taken from his article entitled "A Theory Of Creation".)]

[What was that first epiphany that lead to the formation of the creationary postulate? (This sentence was written by an evolutionist named Jeff and was taken from an evolutionism versus creationism thread with the "Topic: Falsifying Creation".)]

[Because I’m betting that YECism could have been refuted WAY before any creationary postulation was proposed and refined. (This sentence was written by an evolutionist named Jeff and was taken from an evolution versus creation discussion forum with the "Topic: Falsifying Creation".) ]

[So, follow a link (or two, or three...), peruse the sites at your leisure, join up, and release the creationary potential inside. (This sentence was taken from a webpage entitled "Now You Can Be A GOD", which deals with PBeM [Play By eMail] games.)]

[Now look at dunamis, the other Greek word for power. The explosive, miracle working, creationary power of the universe. (These sentences were written by Christian creationist Lee Johndrow and was taken from the webpage "12/16/97 WHO?".)]

[This physical act is the closest manner that we, as human beings, can come to the "Force" of the Creationary Power of the Universe. (This sentence was taken from "The Manual For Mankind Self-help Resource.)]

[For me, these models do not, even slightly, convey the almost incomprehensible creationary power displayed by the model I support. (This sentence was written by mathematician and creationary theorist Robert A. Herrmann, Ph.D.( colorized photo of RAH), and was taken from "A Short Course in the G and MA-models as They Relate to Theology".)]

[(no, Satan did not invent weed, he has no creationary power) (This phrase was written by 9VDC (9Volts) and was taken from the alt.drugs.pot newsgroup thread "Legal Highs ---- Bullshit".)]

[The day human cloning is made possible God can kiss his creationary powers goodbye. (This sentence was written by saregamapathanee on September 08, 2000 in the Sulekha Coffeehouse thread "Re: Why Science fails to explain God".)]

[Accidents, or trauma situations, represent a whole other facet of the creationary powers that we each have in shaping and experiencing our lives. (This sentence was written by Christine Hagey and was taken from the webpage entitled "Earth Alchemy: Bringing Awareness of Energy Flow".)]

["Can he demonstrate his creationary powers in the lab for verification?" (This sentence was written by evolutionist Richard Trice in the alt.atheism newsgroup thread "Re: Ockham's Razor...?")]

[So the private banks have limits on their creationary powers and the central bank does not. (This sentence was written by John Turmel and was taken from the webpage "TURMEL: Social Credit Stream #6 85k".)]

[So you are saying that someone that believes implicitly in teaching science, and also believes in God's creationary powers, is ridiculous? (This sentence was written by Toby and was taken from a post to the aus.religion.christian newsgroup with the topic: "Intelligent design".) (Added 2006.03.02)]

[The god of the bible is like an extemely powerful tribal chieftain with creationary powers. (This sentence (posted Tue, Jun 20 2006) was taken from the alt.atheism newsgroup.)] (Added 2006.12.04)

[I can't say if the creationary predictions are also borne out until you outline what creationary model you subscribe to. (This sentence was written by British evolutionist Gavin R. Tabor, Ph.D., and was taken from the Talk.Origins thread "Re: Objections to Nest[ed] Hierarchies, Biogeography, DNA and Common Descent".)]

[It makes creationary predictions, i.e., what will be found and what will not be found in the world. (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Hans-Friedrich Tamke, B.A. (Hons), as a comment on Walter J. ReMine's creationary message theory, "The Biotic Message", and was taken from a post to the Talk.Origins newsgroup thread entitled "Re: Evolution requires faith".)]

[I believe if you start with an Evolutionary presupposition, you will end with an Evolutionary finding, and likewise with a Creationary presupposition [, it] will yield a Creationary finding. (This sentence was written by Bob and was taken from a comment he made on an essay on origins entitled "Monkeying with the Scopes "Monkey" Trial", by David N. Menton, Ph.D.)]

[Our research library includes more than 3,000 technical scientific works and 500 reprints, written both from the creationary and evolutionary presuppositions. (This sentence was written by John R. Meyer, Ph.D., Director, Van Andel Creation Research Center, and was taken from page 68, Vol. 36, No. 2, Sept. 1999 of the CRSQ.)]

[Some data may be missed because people are working on either evolutionary or creationary presuppositions. (This sentence was written by creationist P. John Lucas and was taken from the webpage "Christian Beliefs".)]

[They are humans who through the evolutionary (or creationary) process have developed mutations in their genetic code that give them extraordinary powers. (This sentence was written by Michael A.J. Randolph and was taken from a review of X-Men: The Movie, in SoundBytes - WCBE's online e-zine.)]

[What's so terrible about experiencing the creationary process together? (This sentence was written by Jose Marquez [25 March 2000] and was taken from the thread "Re: Defining "the cohousing principle".)]

[To expand on this, then each individual Mancharian, if I may say so, exercises its full right of free agency in providing a perfect contribution to the building of a happy society as a whole through his or her creationary process. (This sentence was taken from a purported "trance channeled book" ["(the only one so far) containing vital information from the creator gods, the Mancharians [Reinhard G. Mueller, aka Reni Sentana-Ries and his wife Seila make such claims], has now become their free gift to you, the people of planet earth!"] entitled "The Mancharians' Newest Civilization (Part 8)".)] (Links added 2003.09.28)

[INSIGHTS ON GOD'S CREATIONARY PROCESS (This phrase was written by German evolutionist Dr. Ron J. Hanner and was taken from the webpage entitled "Mediale Vorhersagen" [God Creation Universe Extraterrestrial Life].)]

[But not bonds bought by banks in the creationary process whose payment results in the destruction process. (This sentence was written by John Turmel and was taken from "Subject: TURMEL: Flaherty's Debt Virus Antidote is No Cure".)]

[It’s not an evolutionary process, but it’s a creationary process. (This sentence was taken from an online version of a message preached by Larry Robinson, the pastor of Word of Faith Church, in Russellville, Alabama.)]

[My choice to commit[ ] all of my images to digital formats, and to create in a digital en[ ]viro[n]ment was not only a natural choice, but it also has a reflection of the creationary process that each of my images goes through. (This sentence was written by Peter Graves and was taken from the webpage entitled "My Art".)]

[How would you feel if, unlike most persons whose creationary process was profoundly good to the best of your understanding, your creatress was the most evil thing in your experience? (This sentence was taken from a TIARA WORLD webpage entitled "Ab[ ]out The Fairies".)]

[They would say that evolution is just the physical mechanism God uses for the creationary process, and that Genesis is a metaphor or allegory. (This sentence was written by Fred Framp (posted 04 February 2001) and was taken from the Darwin Awards Philosophy Forum.)]

[My suggestion is that morality is the result of an evolutionary process, not a creationary process. (This sentence was written by evolutionary atheist Ogden Freen and was taken from the newsgroup thread "Re: The Myth of Absolute Truth".)]

[Design is a creationary, innovative process. (This sentence was written by Matthew C. Jadud (a PhD student in Computer Science at Indiana University, Bloomington), who also asserts that "Computer science is a design driven discipline".)]

[Personally I don't claim there was a "'generation' of the original complex". It seems to me there has been a more or less continuous dynamically balanced progressive creationary process of both building up and degeneration of design, which is itself the overall design. (This paragraph was written by Australian creationist Stephen E. Jones and was taken from a message posted [on Sun Dec 29, 2002] to the eGroup "CreationEvolutionDesign".)] (Added 2003.09.10)]]

[Article 4, above, A U-Cosmology describes a Biblically literal model that reveals immensely powerful Divine creationary processes. (This sentence was written by mathematician and young-earth creationary theorist Robert A. Herrmann, Ph.D., and was taken from his home page.)]

[Signal 11's comments point out that technology has put publishing and other creationary processes in the hands of the common man, heretofore an unprecedented development. (This sentence was written by mv7 on Fri Nov 24th, 2000 and was taken from the thread entitled "IP [Intellectual Property] re-evolution & grassroots activism", on the Kuro5hin dot org website.)]

[So I can't provide you [with] creationary proof provided by an evolutionist any easier than you can provide me with evolutionary proof provided by a creationist. What I can provide you with is creationary proof provided by scientist[s] who spent years as evolutionists but eventually could not deny the evidence they were looking at and became creationist[s]. (These sentences were taken from comments made by "monenigmeon" to The Ferrett's journal with the subject "The Weirdest Book I Ever Got" - a graphic novel entitled: "A Creationist's View of Dinosaurs and the Theory Of Evolution" [written by young-earth creationist and cartoonist Jim Pinkoski, 1993].)]

[To this end I would have assumed the outer edge of the universe would have a creationary progression as it went. (This sentence was taken from the thread "re: The Big Bang", on the webpage entitled "Self-Service Science Forum Message" [ABC Online - Australian Broadcasting Corporation].)]

[It's produced a lot of excellent information from the evolutionary proponent. While I can't say the same for the information from the creationary proponent, I can say that his efforts have been amusing and enlightening in their own way. (These sentences were written by evolutionist Tom McDonald and were taken from a newsgroup thread [newsgroups: sci.archaeology, soc.culture.nordic, soc.history.medieval].)]

[I think creationary proponents do tear down evolution as you say. And there is this activism associated with it. Evolution threatens conservative Biblical theology. Evolution is atheistic by nature and seeks to compete with the very foundations of conservative Christianity. There is more to it than just the protection of objective scientific enterprise. The motivations go much deeper and there is [an] effort to establish a philosophical culture/worldview through the road of evolution. It is a difficult dilemma. (The ephemeral sentences quoted above were posted on the "True Seeker's Creation/Evolution Board" (www.slonet.org/~skroger/CEboard/messages/ 45288.html). This WWWBoard is a forum for the open discussion of the issue of creation/evolution.)]

[Here is what anti-Creationary proponents are saying about John Woodmorappe's Geochronology. (This sentence was written by old-earth creationist Allen Roy and was taken from his "Creationary/Flood Catastrophe Sites:" webpage.)]

[A creationary proposal is message theory. (This sentence was written by young-earth creationist Edward Garrett and was taken from the webpage entitled "Evolutionary Skepticism".)]

[We've been arguing about creationary pseudoscience, which is the point of difference both #2 and #3 have from #1, and not belief in God of some sort, so you're either sliding off topic here by focusing back on the differences between #2 and #3, or trying to divert attention. (This sentence was written by Pussy Scales and was taken from "FuckedCompany.com - The Dot-com Deadpool".)]

[Nothing can be manifest until a consciousness or awareness gives it a form and a creationary purpose. (This sentence was written by Carol Burkhart and was taken from "Mayan Cosmology: Transcending Consciousness".)]

[Where did these scholars presume "good" originated, if not from within God's creationary purview? (This sentence was written by atheistic evolutionist Megafrim and was taken from the post "Re: proof for the non-existence of god".)]

[Humans are so inherently self-absorbed and insecure that they will always attach themselves to a philosophy that assures them that a benevolent super-human created them in his image, with a purpose, to sit atop the creationary pyramid until the end of this realm. (This sentence was written by an atheistic evolutionist named Adam and was taken from the webpage " Discussion Page Archives - Month of October '97".)]