Alpha Method, CMB Temperature, Hubble Constant, Dark Energy.Fine structure constant is one of the most wonderful physical constants, a = 1 / 137.036.. It characterizes the velocity of an electron in the hydrogen atom, and thus, it is the ratio between the two fundamental velocities in the microworld: c and ac. It splits some spectral lines in hydrogen atom such that DE = (a/4)2Ei. It sinks as a comb into the medium of other constants and divides them such, that the ratios between some of them are equal Alpha. Let's take: In order to see a we must express these values in the similar form, for example, as wavelengths or length of circumference: lclass = 2pre
= 1.77056410E-14 m; And now we can write: lclass / lCompton = lCompton / lBohr = lBohr / (lRydberg/2) = a. The question arises: where is the end of this row? It is not the simple question. We could receive the similar series, if we "nail" the electron in the hydrogen atom. Proton will be rotating around the nailed electron; will have another Bohr radius, but it's velocity will also be ac, if we demand the Bohr condition to be valid: mvr=nh/2p. For such proton we will be able to write down its Rydberg constant, its Compton wavelength, and its classical radius. Let's go to big scales. According to the original version of Einstein's theory, the Universe was static and closed. He drew its model approximately thus:
A tiny lamp was hung in the top point, inside the sphere. Its light went through the surface of the sphere and dropped the shades of the galaxies from the surface of the sphere onto the flat surface of the infinite table. The projection of the North Pole transforms from a point into a huge circumference, and it must be imagined in the infinite distance. That is why, under the transfer from the static model to the expanding model, it is logically correct to ascribe the value c to the receding velocity of the North Pole from the South Pole. In this work we take exactly the same sphere, but we make the projection thus, that the radial scales would be unchanged. (Look the section Closed Universe, or the computer picture Universe, jpg 116 kb). All geometrical results will be the same, because the original sphere was the same. But now we have no the cause to ascribe the value c to the receding velocity of the N Pole. On the contrary, if we want to build the discrete space-time, we will come to a conclusion, that the "receding velocity" of the N Pole, relatively S Pole must be equal c/2. Here is a picture the page Gravity.
The "residing velocity" is written here between the quotation marks because we build static model. In our static model a quantity of absorbed lines (energy levels) is equal to a quantity of newborn lines. But if in our model the "velocity" between N and S is two times smaller, then the curvature radius in our model is two times smaller; volume is eight times smaller; density is eight times smaller than in the General Relativity. rGR = 3H2/(8pG), r = 3H2/(64pG). If we use this equation for matter density, and if we equal the gravity force between two halves of the Universe to the force of radiation pressure on the surface, dividing the Universe on two halves, we'll receive the temperature of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation: Fgr=G(MUn/2)2 / R2; R = prUn. Curvature radius: rUn= X/2p = c/2pH. Gravity negative pressure: pgravity = - Fgr/S; S = 4prUn2. pradiation_non-Euclidean = (p/4)*ur = (p/4)*8p5k4T4/(15c3h3). pradiation_non-Euclidean = - pgravity After some transformations we'll receive: H = (217p9Gk4T4 /( 5*33c5h3))1/2 = 72.47 km/s/Mpc. uradiation / (rmatterc2)
= 3/(28p3); From the other hand, if we use our value of Hubble constant, which was received earlier in this work (H =73.3 km/s/Mpc), we'll have: Tour = 2.743 K; TCMB_observable = 2.728+/-0.004 K. The error in temperature: Tour / TCMB
= 1.0055; Where is the error? What if our formula r = 3H2/(64pG) is also incorrect? Let's try very close formula: ra =2aH2/G. If we take out a from this formula, we'll have: a = raG/2H2. Now we use equations ra = M/V; V = 2p2rUn3 = X3/(4p) = c3/H3/(4p) and we'll receive the ratio of radii: a = (GM / c2) / rUn. The numerator is the radius of the orbital velocity, or the half of Schwarzschild
radius for Universe's mass; a = (rScharzschild/2) / rHubble. Or thus: lclass / lCompton = lCompton / lBohr = lBohr / (lRydberg/2) = .. = (lScharzschild/2)/lHubble=a. If we perform the succession of steps as above, we'll have: H = (8p7Gk4T4 /( 15a2c5h3))1/2 =74.09 km/s/Mpc. (rac2)
/ uradiation = 2p2/a; From the other hand, if we use our value of Hubble constant, which was received earlier in this work (H =73.3 km/s/Mpc), we'll have: Ta = 2.713 K; TCMB_observable = 2.728+/-0.004 K. The error in temperature: TCMB / Ta
= 1.0055; If you compare these errors and the errors above you will see that Alpha splits the errors too! That was a joke, of course. Alpha-method shows the correct way of further investigations. The formula r =2aH2/G describes the density of matter in the Universe. The density of electrons will be approximately 6p5 times smaller. The density of radiation is comparable to the last. The radiation pressure must sustain the gravity of all these densities. May be, this will also solve the next riddle: "Why is the ratio of proton mass to electron mass so close to the number 6p5?" 6p5 = 1836.1181;
It turned out to be, that the approximate equation mpr/mel
~ 6p5 was received earlier, and it
was explained in somewhat different ways: Inserted the February, 15, 2003. In the beginning of this month the new excellent results were received. Look the section CMB = - Dark Energy. According to this section the Alpha-cascade
looks thus: And moreover, at extreme conditions, i.e.,
at energies of Grand Unification we have one more Alpha row: According to this equation we have the new expression for the density of matter in the Universe: r = rcritical * W rcritical - critical density of
the Universe; Thus we receive the formula for density of matter: To the index of Space Genetics; This page was made: the 8-th of February 2002.
|
Extremely urgent note, 2009. Attention! Magnetic trap of Devil!There is a very big probability that magnetic trap will kill us all, if we will not stop powerful colliders. Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop / liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ... It is probable that the microscopic magnetic trap can be created at the collider. Magnetic trap will grow capturing the normal substance. As a result, magnetic trap can destroy the Earth. Magnetic hole is a magnetic analog of the black hole. The black hole is bounded by gravitational forces, and the magnetic hole is bounded by magnetic forces, which are many-many times stronger than gravity forces. Magnetic hole is a magnetic dipole, in the form of a circle, where there is the critical magnetic field. The lines of magnetic induction are directed perpendicular to the plane of the circle. Nucleons are microscopic magnets, and they can be easily captured by the critical field of the hole. As a result the hole is growing. The approximate computation shows that the minimal possible magnetic hole, which can capture a nucleon, has a mass slightly more than one thousand masses of nucleons. The Tevatron collider is now working near this region (1 TeV). The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will be able to create the particles with the rest mass, which are seven times more that the minimal possible mass of magnetic hole. According to publications, LHC will create microscopic black holes. Most theorists suggest that these black holes will disappear, because of the Hawking evaporation. However, we know that there are several theories of gravity. Some theories did not even admit the existence of black holes. In addition, there are several theories of black holes. Therefore, confidence in the classical theory of black holes and in a process of evaporation of black holes is very poor. For several years, some scientists argue and demand to ban the construction of powerful colliders. Among the known dangerous objects that may lead to global catastrophe are the following: microscopic black holes, strangelets, magnetic monopoles, vacuum bubbles. I learned about these disputes and concerns only in early September 2008. And then I immediately noticed that the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, were almost not analyzed. In early September, I assumed that the probability of a global catastrophe is less than 0.000001. However, after three months of analysis of the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, and after the analysis of space observations, my assessment of the global disaster has surpassed dozens of percents. Some theorists suggest that the Higgs bosons will be registered at the LHC. And, if these particles will not been found, the theorists would be very surprised; - this would prove that the Standard Model is wrong. Higgs boson had received a new name, "the God particle". We know that the most of particles have their corresponding antiparticles. So, if there is a particle of God, then there is a particle of Devil. Two colliding particles can give two more massive particles, - the particle and its antiparticle, for example, an electron and positron. By adding the colliding energy, we can get the God particle and its anti-particle, the magnetic trap of Devil. Particles and antiparticles have diametrically opposed properties. Indeed, the Higgs boson causes the ordinary matter to have a mass. But the magnetic hole captures the substance and transforms its rest mass-energy into another form of matter, - the magnetic field of the Devil's trap. Say me now, are we have the right to touch the particle of God? Microscopic magnetic holes created at the collider, will move to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path. Eventually they will merge together into a single and much stronger magnetic hole. The thin shell of the Earth, together with us, will be ejected into cosmic space, but the rest of the Earth will turn into an electric current loop of several meters radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same mass is 9 millimeters. Half of Earth’s mass will be transformed into magnetic field of neutron hole, and another half will be transformed into radiation and kinetic energy of the released shell. Magnetic hole will not decay if it was born in such cold place, as the collider, where the temperature is close to 0 K. If the magnetic hole is born in a collision of space particle with atmospheric particle, it has a speed, which is close to the speed of light. As a result, such magnetic hole will evaporate almost immediately as a result of energetic collisions with atmospheric particles. Such evaporating magnetic hole will form a cosmic-ray particle shower. Such showers are observable. Huge magnetic holes are also observable is cosmos.
In the remnants of supernova SN 1987A we can see a system of rings, which remind us the magnetic hole. It is possible that this magnetic hole is decaying now. It seems as if these rings embrace a hyperboloid. And now look at the electron, moving along two hyperboles in coordinates x, ict, in my electron model program. Each electron crosses the entire Universe in a period of time, which is equal to the classical period of the electron. This paradoxical conclusion is the consequence of the Special Relativity Theory. The ring structure of SN 1987A and our electron model have common visible properties. The Earth and the Sun can be turned into the same ring structure. Magnetic collapse is much more rapid than the gravity collapse. At the process of magnetic collapse the nucleon turns such, that its magnetic dipole moment becomes parallel to the magnetic dipole moment of a trap. Gravity collapse needs displacing of a matter inside the Schwarzschild radius. The time interval of neutrino registration at neutrino observatories had proved the reality of magnetic collapse of dying stars. Particle's collision energies and bombs: Several eV - chemical bomb; Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical
structure of matter. Scientific crime.Only crazy people can try to create the particles with the rest mass, more than 1000 nucleon masses. It is very possible that in the region from 1000 to 7000 aum, hundreds types of particles and resonances can be created. It is clear, that the most of them will decay. But some of them will grow, capturing the ordinary matter. Academician Migdal wrote 30 years ago about pion condensation in the strong fields. As a result he had come to conclusion that neutron stars can have any masses. My approximate computation also shows that the minimal possible neutron star can have a mass, about one thousand of nucleon masses. Such embryo of neutron star can by made in collider. Not long ago the new strange unexpected particle was discovered at the Tevatron collider. It decays at several muons, up to eight units. Somebody had already named it the Halloween particle. I named it the muon hole. What will be made the next? The magnetic trap of Devil? It will not decay, but it will transform us into its magnetic field. Majority of contemporary physicists imagine quark-gluon plasma as a suck with peas. That is a very dangerous imagination. Particles are not points with labels, where their quantum properties were written. Particles are not the material essences, independent of space-time; they are just space-time elements, strings. Dear reader, the situation is extremely serious. The physics now is in the deep crisis. Theorists, in order to save their religious Big Bang theory, invented “the dark energy" as a new either. They want now to test their wretched theories at the powerful Large Hadron Collider. Those persons, with high ranks and high scientific degrees, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a crime now. The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials. The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us. Scientists-criminals must be punished. But they continue to lie about the safety of the LHC, and are preparing the global terrorist crime now. Dear reader! Big Bang adherents can lead the Earth to the utter destruction. Particle collisions with the energy more then 1 TeV must be prohibited by the international law. The science must be cleared from the Big Bang delusion. Big-bangers want to touch the particle of God, but thus, they lead us into the magnetic trap of Devil. People, will you silently endure the massacre? Some documents and links. In November 2008, I arrived to Moscow in order to file a lawsuit against the Russian Academy of Sciences and against the most active propagandists/promoters of the LHC launch. Unfortunately, for lack of funds, I still (February 2009) can not to do it. In late November at the "meeting of four" there was decided to hear my report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?" at a workshop in one of the leading institutions of Moscow. But later, I received a "retreat" from this institution In December, I sent the Letter to the President of Russia. In January, I received an answer in which it was stated that my letter was forwarded to the Russian Academy of Sciences. In December, I sent the Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation. Soon after, I received the answer stating that my letter "was sent for review in the prescribed manner". In the end of January I returned to Feodosia (Ukraine) and continued to inform about the risks of the global catastrophe. You can read some letters, which were send to the Google groups, - just click my Google-profile. Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations. Who are you, dear reader: "a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"? Magnetic trap of Devil. Recent calculations show that it is not excluded that microscopic magnetic traps were already created, and they are growing now somewhere inside the Earth. Arguments, proving that "The LHC will lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist"; "We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe". Religious and mystic arguments. Read the frequently updated page The end of Extremely urgent note, 2009. |
