CMB = + Dark EnergyAll is relative in this world. The biggest error of Einstein, the author of relativity theory, is
hidden in his words The supporters of Big Bang theory say that the cosmic microwave background radiation is the radiant heat left over from the Big Bang. But Big Bang is only hypothesis. From our point of view the Universe is static. Ever Young Universe is much more interesting. Static model has much more paradoxical properties. The supporters of Big Bang hypothesis are imprisonment in the narrow frames of Big Bang. They try to explain the origination of galaxies, but at the same time they are blind and cannot recognize the mothers and fathers of contemporary galaxies in the distant quasars. They cannot see the processes of galaxies reproduction, the ways of transfer of genetic information from already died galaxies-ancestors to newborn galaxies. They predicted CMB radiation, but cannot predict its precise characteristics: temperature, pressure and energy. They even invented the dark energy, but are blind to see that just the CMB plays the role of positive dark energy in the Universe. Computation shows that the Universe is closed. Its two-dimensional model can be imagined in the form of sphere. In the closed world there are no straight lines. The gravity force lines are fastening the sphere tightly and try to collapse it. In the sphere the gravity forces are not only the attracting agents between the massive objects. They remind also the surface forces in the soap-babble. Gravity forces lines try to gather together the film of a sphere. But a vast amount of CMB photons are also existing in the Universe. The quantity of CMB photons is many thousands times bigger than the quantity of visible photons emitted by stars of galaxies. Every photon tries to move straightly; but it is forced to turn and turn constantly; and is forced to move along the curved surface of the Universes sphere. Thus, photons try to straighten the film of the sphere; and thus, tries to make it bigger. It is evidently that in the static model the straightening forces of CMB radiation compensate the fastening forces of gravity. In his original theory Einstein had build the static model, and in order to support the Universe from the gravity collapse, he had introduced the antigravity lambda-coefficient. He could predict the CMB radiation much earlier than the supporters of Big Bang hypothesis did. But Einstein had through out the lambda-coefficient. For almost eighty years the antigravity was forgotten. The observations in recent years had forced the Big Bang scientists to reincarnate the lambda-coefficient, which earlier was the property of static model supporters. In the bottom we will show how the static model gives the exact values of the CMB characteristics. Conclusions made here are not applicable to Big Bang hypothesis, because correct Big Bang is Eternal Big Bang, and Eternal Big Bang is the model of Ever Young Universe. Let's transfer from investigation of the spherical film to the cross section of the closed world, which can be divided on the multitude of spheres. Let's sum up the surface forces applied through the section, and compute the negative gravity pressure applied to this cross section. Let's divide all matter on two equal parts, and place these parts on the opposite poles of the closed world. The resulting gravity force, applied to any of these parts will be equal zero. It can be understandable if you imagine two ships, situated in the different poles of some water planet. These two ships are connected with large quantity of ropes-meridians, force lines. Ropes pull in different directions and the resulting force will be zero. But on the equator the resulting force of ropes-meridians will not be zero. F = G (M/2)2 / (2L)2. (1) L - distance from the Pole to Equator. L = R(p/2), (2) R - curvature radius of the Universe. But in the case of the Universe the Equator id not a line , a but sphere with the area S. S = 4pR2. (3) Let's divide (1)/(3) and receive the negative gravitational pressure p. To be more precise, it's transverse part. Transverse pressure acts on the curved space, longitudinal pressure acts oh the matter. p = -F/S = - G M2 / R4 / p3/16. (4) Now we'll use the expressions for mass and for the volume of the closed Universe M = rV, V=2p2R3, and we'll receive: p = - G r2 R2 p/4. (5) The CMB radiation creates positive longitudinal pressure on the mater and transverse pressure on the curved space. Let's situate two sources of light on the Poles. The transverse pressure on the equatorial surface will be: p = n 2 i / S, (6) where: n - the quantity of photons, emitted by the source every second; Energy of one photon: E = i c. Consequently: u = Q / (2p2R3).
It's wonderful! From (5) and (7): u = G r 2 R2 p/ 4. (8) And now is the second great moment - the Grand Unification! Postulate: Gravity force between two masses, situated on the poles, has an extreme. Consequently, it is described by the same law as three others forces. Relative density of the Universe is it's normalized charge. The square of the normalized charge is the constant of gravity interactions: W2 = agr , (9) At Grand Unification energies these constants converge: agr = aweak = astrong = (8/3) aem. (10) The coefficient 8/3 before the electromagnetic constant had appeared because of normalization. For more details see: Okun L.B. "Fizika Elementarnyh Chastits". 1988. pp.92-94. (In Russian). Thus, W is the ratio of the matter density to the critical density of the Universe. Consequently: r = W rc. (11) It is also known: rc = 3H2 / (8pG). (12) H - Habble constant. From (9) and (10): W = ((8/3)aem)1/2. (13) From (11), (12) and (13): r = 3H2 / (8pG) * ((8/3)aem)1/2. (14) From (8) and (14): u = 3/G H4 / (32p) aem R2 . (15) In our static/stationary model of the Universe, the Hubble constant is the angular velocity of light, and it can be expressed through the curvature radius: H = c /(2pR). (16) From (15) and (16): u = 3/G * c2H2 / (128p3) aem . (17) One can exclude the Hubble constant using the equation: npr / nmin = ap df. (18) nmax - Compton frequency of proton;
From (17) we can find the specific energy of the CMB radiation. In order to find the temperature we use the formula: T = (u c / 4 / s)1/4 . (19) Thus we can have: T = 2.72832 +/- 0.00010 K. Observable temperature according to different sources are: Moreover, this method had proved that the value of Hubble constant used in this work: H = (2.37565 +/- 0.00035)*10-18
1/c, Observation gives: The main conclusion: Dark Energy and Dark Matter.In order to satisfy the observational data, contemporary cosmologists were forced to reincarnate the antigravity, l-coefficient, which was firstly introduced by Einstein in his original static model, and which was named now as "dark energy". Scientists are at the edge of their seats. In recent years, we have learned that 95% of the Universe is made of a type of matter or energy that we cannot see nor understand... Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe, Michael S. Turner: For the first time, we have a plausible, complete accounting of matter and energy in the Universe. Expressed a fraction of the critical density it goes like this: neutrinos, between 0.3% and 15%; stars, 0.5%; baryons (total), 5%; matter (total), 40%; smooth, dark energy, 60%; adding up to the critical density. This accounting is consistent with the inflationary prediction of a flat Universe and defines three dark-matter problems: Where are the dark baryons? What is the nonbaryonic dark matter? What is the nature of the dark energy? The leading candidate for the (optically) dark baryons is diffuse hot gas; the leading candidates for the nonbaryonic dark matter are slowly moving elementary particles left over from the earliest moments (cold dark matter), such as axions or neutralinos; the leading candidates for the dark energy involve fundamental physics and include a cosmological constant (vacuum energy), a rolling scalar field (quintessence), and light, frustrated topological defects. In our model the density is about 7 times smaller. We reject from the Turner's accounting 80 % of fantastic axions, neutralinos and other quintessence. Thus, we have no problem with the dark energy. In our model, the CMB radiation performs the repulsive role of the dark energy, but CMB is "visible". The average energy density of CMB radiation in the Universe is several orders higher than the density of all other types of electromagnetic radiation. Dark matter seems also to be quite speculative. Our candidate on the rotating role of dark matter is much more interesting! The "ghosts" of galaxies -- the objects that we see optically and fill gravitationally -- are situated behind the first pole, at z bigger than 0.51573. Ghost, grand-ghost, grand-grand-ghost are the same galaxy, but living in the different time epochs, and are visible in opposite points of a sky as a groups of close quasars with very different red shifts. Their gravity influence is not uniform and very important for us. Thus, if the gravity influence of now living galaxies is equal to 1, than the ghost's influence is equal to K-1 = 0.97931758 perform the role of dark matter. K is the coefficient received in the bottom amendment. Moreover, our "dark" matter not only the additional rotator of contemporary galaxies, but they also perform the reproductive role. The gravity forces from opposite sides almost compensate each other if ghost is in the state of rest near the opposite pole. From the other hand, if in some place in remote past there was a big galaxy, which had a great local velocity, then now in its place its ghosts and grad-ghosts will work as a powerful rotators, which will give great chaotic linear and angular velocities to contemporary galaxies. Then in our place, the gravithermal traces of ancient galaxies and stars will rush about everywhere, causing the cyclones and anticyclones in the atmospheres of planets and stars, and in the galactic clouds of dust and gas. Thus, the gravithermal traces are the initiators of stars formation. Moreover, the arrangement of newborn stars will try to attain the arrangement of constellations from already dead stars, which are still visible in the ghosts. Thus, the genetic code of galaxies-ancestors transfers to contemporary offspring-galaxies. It is very probable that Sun continues to interact with its star-ancestor, and rotate around it. It is very possible, that Jupiter with its satellites was condensed at the place of a ghost, when early Sun went through the dust cloud in the Galaxy. As a result, it is possible that Jupiter system shows us the appearance of the solar systems lived many billions years ago. It is very possible that cyclones and anticyclones are the result of the changing interferential picture of gravithermal traces of ghosts. If we change in our reasoning the closed space of the Universe onto the closed space of a biological object; and the gravithermal interaction onto the electromagnetic interaction, then we will approach to the explanation of the processes of coping, growth and reproduction of living beings and their cells. AmendmentWe have excluded the dark energy, but the dark matter still exist. The mass, computed in the first pert of this page, consists from two parts: barionic mass and the dark matter. Here there is the way how to find the ratio between them. At the distance R the create the bundle of the force lines, with the density, proportional to the gravity potential: aEuclid = Gm/R2 = 4pGm/S. On the equator in non-Euclidean world R = (p/2)r, and area: S = 4pr2. anon-Euclid = 4pGm/S = Gm/r2. Let's write through the angle: R = jr. S = 4p(sin(R/r)r); a = Gm / (sin(R/r)r)2. The force line passes the equator at the following angles: ji = Ri/r, = p/2; 3p/2, 5p/2... At transition of some distance R, the force line becomes weaker by n times. Then: at j1 = R1/r = p/2; a1 = n1Gm / r2; j2 = R2/r = 3p/2; a2 = - n2Gm / r2; j3 = R3/r = 5p/2; a3 = n3Gm / r2; ... We are not interested in the potential, but in the density of force lines. And, as a result, we reject the "-" sign in the expression for a. a = n1Gm / r2 + n2Gm / r2 + n3Gm / r2 + ... + niGm / r2 +...; It is obvious, that damping coefficient is proportional to the ratio of small intervals of time, measured correspondingly on actual and conventional time scales: ni = dtc,i / dtf,i tc = (1-(1-H)^tf )/H = (1 - k^tf ) / (1-k); k = 1 - H. dtc = -1/(1-k) * exp(ln(k)tf )ln(k)dtf dtc = -(ln(1-H)1/H) k^(tf) dtf. dtc = k^(tf) dtf. dtc / dtf = k^(tf). at j = p/2; tf,1 = T/4 = 1/(4H); dtc / dtf = k^(1/(4H)) = (1-H)^(1/(4H)) = e-1/4; at j = 3p/2; tf,2 = 3T/4 = 3/(4H); dtc / dtf = e-3/4; at j = 5p/2; tf,3 = 5T/4 = 5/(4H); dtc / dtf = e-5/4; ... a = Gm / r2 * (e-1/4 +e-3/4 + e-5/4 + ... ); K = e-1/4 (1 + e-1/2 + e-1
+ e-3/2 ...+ e-i/2 + ...) = e-1/4 (1 + e-1/2 + e-1 + e-3/2 ...+ e-i/2 + ...) = e-1/4 x e-1/4 (1 + e-1/2 (1 + e-1/2 + e- 1 + e-3/2...+ e-i/2 + ...)) = e-1/4 (1 + e-1/2 x) x = 1 + e-1/2 x x = 1/(1- e-1/2) K = e-1/4 x = e-1/4 / (1- e-1/2) = 1.97931758. Thus we have: Total mass and it's ghost influence: 1.97931758..; Here is a link about the history of CMB predictions and discovery, which was made on the basis of the static model of Universe, much earlier than that was made by the supporters of the Big Bang model: http://www.dfi.uem.br/~macedane/history_of_2.7k.html Look also the page Alpha-method,
where the analogues result was received To the index of Space Genetics This page was made: the 23 of February, 2002, Last updated: the 15 of February, 2005.
|
Extremely urgent note, 2009. Attention! Magnetic trap of Devil!There is a very big probability that magnetic trap will kill us all, if we will not stop powerful colliders. Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop / liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ... It is probable that the microscopic magnetic trap can be created at the collider. Magnetic trap will grow capturing the normal substance. As a result, magnetic trap can destroy the Earth. Magnetic hole is a magnetic analog of the black hole. The black hole is bounded by gravitational forces, and the magnetic hole is bounded by magnetic forces, which are many-many times stronger than gravity forces. Magnetic hole is a magnetic dipole, in the form of a circle, where there is the critical magnetic field. The lines of magnetic induction are directed perpendicular to the plane of the circle. Nucleons are microscopic magnets, and they can be easily captured by the critical field of the hole. As a result the hole is growing. The approximate computation shows that the minimal possible magnetic hole, which can capture a nucleon, has a mass slightly more than one thousand masses of nucleons. The Tevatron collider is now working near this region (1 TeV). The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will be able to create the particles with the rest mass, which are seven times more that the minimal possible mass of magnetic hole. According to publications, LHC will create microscopic black holes. Most theorists suggest that these black holes will disappear, because of the Hawking evaporation. However, we know that there are several theories of gravity. Some theories did not even admit the existence of black holes. In addition, there are several theories of black holes. Therefore, confidence in the classical theory of black holes and in a process of evaporation of black holes is very poor. For several years, some scientists argue and demand to ban the construction of powerful colliders. Among the known dangerous objects that may lead to global catastrophe are the following: microscopic black holes, strangelets, magnetic monopoles, vacuum bubbles. I learned about these disputes and concerns only in early September 2008. And then I immediately noticed that the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, were almost not analyzed. In early September, I assumed that the probability of a global catastrophe is less than 0.000001. However, after three months of analysis of the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, and after the analysis of space observations, my assessment of the global disaster has surpassed dozens of percents. Some theorists suggest that the Higgs bosons will be registered at the LHC. And, if these particles will not been found, the theorists would be very surprised; - this would prove that the Standard Model is wrong. Higgs boson had received a new name, "the God particle". We know that the most of particles have their corresponding antiparticles. So, if there is a particle of God, then there is a particle of Devil. Two colliding particles can give two more massive particles, - the particle and its antiparticle, for example, an electron and positron. By adding the colliding energy, we can get the God particle and its anti-particle, the magnetic trap of Devil. Particles and antiparticles have diametrically opposed properties. Indeed, the Higgs boson causes the ordinary matter to have a mass. But the magnetic hole captures the substance and transforms its rest mass-energy into another form of matter, - the magnetic field of the Devil's trap. Say me now, are we have the right to touch the particle of God? Microscopic magnetic holes created at the collider, will move to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path. Eventually they will merge together into a single and much stronger magnetic hole. The thin shell of the Earth, together with us, will be ejected into cosmic space, but the rest of the Earth will turn into an electric current loop of several meters radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same mass is 9 millimeters. Half of Earth’s mass will be transformed into magnetic field of neutron hole, and another half will be transformed into radiation and kinetic energy of the released shell. Magnetic hole will not decay if it was born in such cold place, as the collider, where the temperature is close to 0 K. If the magnetic hole is born in a collision of space particle with atmospheric particle, it has a speed, which is close to the speed of light. As a result, such magnetic hole will evaporate almost immediately as a result of energetic collisions with atmospheric particles. Such evaporating magnetic hole will form a cosmic-ray particle shower. Such showers are observable. Huge magnetic holes are also observable is cosmos.
In the remnants of supernova SN 1987A we can see a system of rings, which remind us the magnetic hole. It is possible that this magnetic hole is decaying now. It seems as if these rings embrace a hyperboloid. And now look at the electron, moving along two hyperboles in coordinates x, ict, in my electron model program. Each electron crosses the entire Universe in a period of time, which is equal to the classical period of the electron. This paradoxical conclusion is the consequence of the Special Relativity Theory. The ring structure of SN 1987A and our electron model have common visible properties. The Earth and the Sun can be turned into the same ring structure. Magnetic collapse is much more rapid than the gravity collapse. At the process of magnetic collapse the nucleon turns such, that its magnetic dipole moment becomes parallel to the magnetic dipole moment of a trap. Gravity collapse needs displacing of a matter inside the Schwarzschild radius. The time interval of neutrino registration at neutrino observatories had proved the reality of magnetic collapse of dying stars. Particle's collision energies and bombs: Several eV - chemical bomb; Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical
structure of matter. Scientific crime.Only crazy people can try to create the particles with the rest mass, more than 1000 nucleon masses. It is very possible that in the region from 1000 to 7000 aum, hundreds types of particles and resonances can be created. It is clear, that the most of them will decay. But some of them will grow, capturing the ordinary matter. Academician Migdal wrote 30 years ago about pion condensation in the strong fields. As a result he had come to conclusion that neutron stars can have any masses. My approximate computation also shows that the minimal possible neutron star can have a mass, about one thousand of nucleon masses. Such embryo of neutron star can by made in collider. Not long ago the new strange unexpected particle was discovered at the Tevatron collider. It decays at several muons, up to eight units. Somebody had already named it the Halloween particle. I named it the muon hole. What will be made the next? The magnetic trap of Devil? It will not decay, but it will transform us into its magnetic field. Majority of contemporary physicists imagine quark-gluon plasma as a suck with peas. That is a very dangerous imagination. Particles are not points with labels, where their quantum properties were written. Particles are not the material essences, independent of space-time; they are just space-time elements, strings. Dear reader, the situation is extremely serious. The physics now is in the deep crisis. Theorists, in order to save their religious Big Bang theory, invented “the dark energy" as a new either. They want now to test their wretched theories at the powerful Large Hadron Collider. Those persons, with high ranks and high scientific degrees, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a crime now. The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials. The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us. Scientists-criminals must be punished. But they continue to lie about the safety of the LHC, and are preparing the global terrorist crime now. Dear reader! Big Bang adherents can lead the Earth to the utter destruction. Particle collisions with the energy more then 1 TeV must be prohibited by the international law. The science must be cleared from the Big Bang delusion. Big-bangers want to touch the particle of God, but thus, they lead us into the magnetic trap of Devil. People, will you silently endure the massacre? Some documents and links. In November 2008, I arrived to Moscow in order to file a lawsuit against the Russian Academy of Sciences and against the most active propagandists/promoters of the LHC launch. Unfortunately, for lack of funds, I still (February 2009) can not to do it. In late November at the "meeting of four" there was decided to hear my report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?" at a workshop in one of the leading institutions of Moscow. But later, I received a "retreat" from this institution In December, I sent the Letter to the President of Russia. In January, I received an answer in which it was stated that my letter was forwarded to the Russian Academy of Sciences. In December, I sent the Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation. Soon after, I received the answer stating that my letter "was sent for review in the prescribed manner". In the end of January I returned to Feodosia (Ukraine) and continued to inform about the risks of the global catastrophe. You can read some letters, which were send to the Google groups, - just click my Google-profile. Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations. Who are you, dear reader: "a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"? Magnetic trap of Devil. Recent calculations show that it is not excluded that microscopic magnetic traps were already created, and they are growing now somewhere inside the Earth. Arguments, proving that "The LHC will lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist"; "We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe". Religious and mystic arguments. Read the frequently updated page The end of Extremely urgent note, 2009. |
