Some features of the modals:
Modal auxiliaries have both present and a past tense
form, except for must and need:
Present |
can |
will |
shall |
may |
must |
need |
Past |
could |
would |
should |
might |
- |
- |
You might argue that need has a past tense form needed, but
this is only true for the lexical verb. When need is used as an auxiliary,
it can't come up in a past tense form. The difference is demonstrated by the
next two examples:
1. * |
He needed go |
2. |
He needed a drink |
In the first example the verb is used as an auxiliary. Putting the auxilliary
need in a past tense form yields an ungrammatical sentence. In the second
example, however, it is used as a lexical verb. Here the past tense seems to
do just fine.
The form of the modal auxiliary:
Since a modal is always the first auxiliary in a predicate, it follows that
the modal is always tensed. After all, the first verb in a predicate is always
responsible for carrying tense. Therefore, whenever a modal is present, it is
the first verb in the predicate and it is tensed. Modal auxiliaries are exceptional when it comes to subject-verb agreement. Modals
are the only types of verb that do not have subject-verb agreement. That means
that they don't get the -s ending for the third person singular:
3. |
He can sing. |
4. * |
He cans sing. |
The form of the following verb:
The verb following a modal auxiliary always appears in its basic stem form.
Compare the example sentences already given on the Auxiliaries
page and notice the verbs following the modals in their non-finite form:
ii. |
He will forget. |
modal |
vi. |
He will have forgotten. |
modal perfect |
vii. |
He will be forgotting. |
modal progressive |
viii. |
He will be forgotten. |
modal passive |
xii. |
He will have been forgetting. |
modal perfect progressive |
xiii. |
He will have been forgotten. |
modal perfect passive |
xiv. |
He will be being forgotten. |
modal progressive passive |
xvi. |
He will have been being forgotten. |
modal perfect progressive passive |
|