Exposing
Chiluba's Weaker Nature
|
Time
comes in any person's life when he is confronted with a problem
whose resolution calls for self-examination. When the very welfare
of the given individual is at stake, the very best of this individual's
mental and physical capacities are called upon in this examination.
To get a true picture of the self, the memory of the given individual
will play a leading role. Knowledge of what a person was, and
how he became what he is will give a better picture of what
a person really is in the present. Apart from serving as a guide
to self knowledge, memory gives to the person paradigms that
he can follow, examples he can apply to the present. This memory
of the self will help prevent the individual from repeating
mistakes.
Memory, of course, is not the only factor that helps in this
examination of the self. Intellect, and many other factors,
also play vital roles. Ultimately, the limitations of the given
individual's physical and mental capacities, and the situation
of these among other, more important, and, unfortunately, not
directly accessible external factors in the real world, will
determine whether this individual will be able to know the self,
and, with this knowledge, be able to resolve the problem he
is confronted with in the way that will ensure his continued
prosperity, improvement of his state if necessary, or a change
to the state he finds himself in. Ultimately, the aim of this
self examination is the perfection of a coping strategy. The
aim is to know what is better, and what is worse, and hopefully
guide one's known self in the direction of the better option,
and hope to keep it that way.
If
an individual is aware of all the factors that play a role in
his search for self knowledge, in his finding of a coping strategy,
then he would know that exploring these factors, and improving
on some capacities, like his intellect and memory, will enable
the same person to fare better at any given moment, under any
given set of circumstances. The most successful specimens of
man are those who strive continuously to improve their mental
and physical capacities, which in turn make them better able
to know and adjust to the external factors that play a role
in the success, or failure of the coping strategies they devise.
Election
is a time in an individual's life when, thanks to the democratic
ballot box, he is given a chance to participate in the maintenance,
changing or improving of those external factors that influence
his life conditions, within whose frame he devises his coping
strategy. The better those conditions are, the less the pressure
that comes to bear on individual members, the better able to
survive they are. The democratic ballot box is this culture's
best answer to the need of individual members of any given society
to have a hand in their welfare, which is linked to the welfare
of the entire country to which they belong.
It is correct to say then that democracy is a system of rule
in which all members of a society can participate in choosing
those they will entrust with the determination of their own
destinies. How qualified individual members are to know which
of the candidates are actually qualified enough for the post
in contention is another question whose answer has led the world's
most advanced countries to include organs in their societies
comprising the most educated and enlightened members of the
society, which, even if this agenda is not openly stated, effectively
screen out candidates in the run-up to the elections, and prevent
those who are unqualified from gaining access to positions of
power, rather than rub out the democratic system altogether,
or, as is the case with some of "Africa's more progressive
regimes", the maintenance of incompetent but trusted regimes
for longer than is sensible for fear of a state in which the
interests of foreign powers will win over the misled choices
of such voters; a design that works well for street gangs fearing
police infiltration, but can become too paranoid and eventually
counterproductive for country like settings.
The
independence era found Zambians, and most Africans, saddled with an example of
"Africa's more progressive regimes" above, and they, as
a country, and as a continent, felt that they were not going anywhere.
A western led campaign to democratize gave Zambians new hope. At
the time that Zambians went to the ballot box a decade ago,
and chose Frederick Chiluba as their president, he was not only
a symbol of change, but was seen as the best vehicle to this
change. Zambians were convinced then that, considering the persecution
the man had endured under the Kenneth David Kaunda regime, he
would work relentlessly to make changes that would prevent future
leaders from doing to their fellow countrymen and human beings
what had been done to him. For Zambians, this was a case of
"who feels it knows it", and, in this former union
leader, a man who stood up for the interests of common labourers,
they felt they would find the humanity they felt was missing
in Kenneth Kaunda's system of rule, the realism that would improve
the conditions of life in which they lived.
They
could not have been more mistaken. Chiluba repaid Zambians for
the trust they put in him by surpassing Kenneth Kaunda in all
but a few of the very means he used to maintain his rule.
Zambian
dictators distinguish themselves from their counterparts in
other parts of the African continent by their adherence to surreptitious,
colonial-like means of maintaining their rule. Where their counterparts
are loudly shooting their opposition, or locking them up indefinitely
without accounting for the arrests, with a disregard for human
rights and a brutality equal only to that shown by officers
in Nazi Germany, and even going to the extent of openly warning
those who wish to be subversive that they will look for them
in their mother's wombs, Zambian oppressors sabotage potential
opposition before it has become a real threat, by sidetracking
successful bright men whose careers, though not political, are
bound to bring them that way; by sending such men abroad on
useless missions that isolate them from their careers and interests,
or make their lives impossible if they do not cooperate; by
making it impossible for anyone who has been abroad for a short
period from contesting in elections; by playing a role in the
eventual death of a large number of members of an opposition
party to prevent a comeback campaign, by sneaking behind with
anthrax and god knows what, using AIDS as a cover for the sudden
deaths of their rivals, or, as has been a hallmark of Chiluba's
regime, by arranging accidents when other means are ineffective.
Like the most effective strategy used by their colonial predecessors,
Zambian dictators declare peace and pledge adherence to democratic
rules of governance, and, once the citizens have lowered their
guard, go behind the scenes ensuring the dominance of their
regime, and, as is usually the case with those who believe that
they are better than other men, by contradicting their own belief
by enforcing this inferiority.
Rather
than go into endless recriminations that talk of belittling
extramarital affairs, of incompetence, of senseless money and
fear motivated political defections, of the ideological poverty
of the ruling elite, of lackeys who will dance to any beat Chiluba
conjures up, of the accidents in which many suddenly and suspiciously
die, of the death of three fifths of the members of UNIP, Zambians,
as indeed all Africans, should be asking themselves how their
welfare, which is in dire need of care at this moment when diseases
are spreading like wildfire, when poverty is increasing, when
genocidal violence is becoming more and more prevalent on the
continent, can be better taken care of; how they can prevent
it from falling into the hands of men like Frederick Chiluba.
The welfare of Africans always seems to land in the hands of
its sons who are oblivious of their own interests, of their
positioning in this cold, cruel world. A continent that does
not lack qualified, intelligent and articulate persons, the
individuals who rule in African countries are usually inarticulate,
lack worldly knowledge, and succeed only to create the very
conditions that cause the draining of one of the continent's
most valuable resource. Africa seems to have educational institutions
set up for the education of other countries' intellectuals,
known commonly as the intellectual drain. Those very same institutions
that aided the colonial powers in their discovery and elimination
of African intellect are still today, in the era of independence,
doing nothing better than using up the continent's scarce funds
as the products of these same institutions end up roaming the
streets in perpetual, fruitless searches of work, and, if they
do not get destroyed this way on the streets, simply leave the
country to find greener pastures elsewhere.
Africa
is our only home. It is all we have. Official misconduct today
may benefit the self, and family members, but will ultimately
hurt the progeny of all who are involved. There is no way to
protect against such an eventuality. The funds misappropriated
by an unscrupulous official today will not protect his family
members and their children tomorrow from the ravages that this
mismanagement will bring with it. The suffering and vulnerability
that comes with this wretched position, this itself laying us
open to further decline and spectres of more misery, is not
wholly a result of western interferences and manipulation, but,
to a large extent (if not the sole reason that the interests
of foreign powers have prevailed on our continent), is bequeathed
unto us by our own people, whose descendants are experiencing
the very same suffering that everybody else is going through,
from those whose ancestors profited from the slave trade in
the centuries gone by, to those who eagerly become puppets of
western powers in our time.
They
may well reelect Chiluba this "Christmas", and this
time his victory will be more official than it has ever been,
thanks to international legitimacy that the group of international
observers will help establish. In this aftermath, those of us
who will complain will be considered as insane, frustrated,
mistaken, or even deluded, because of this very observance.
However, we know better.
Keeping
up with the pace of events, we should make it a point to launch
campaigns, through whichever means we find, using opportunities
as they arise, to enlighten Africans about the nature and importance
of a position of rule, to try to change the attitude of Africans
to positions of rule. We should take examples from similar campaigns
which have managed to change mentalities worldwide. We should
do all we can to make our future leaders aware of the backlash
to one's own welfare of mismanagement in this so important aspect
of social living. This message should be directed at our progeny
so that they are enlightened enough to know, to think twice
before taking such a step, even if they see the possibility.
Without
organs in place that manage the electoral process so that it
works to the benefit of the concerned communities, and with
the means to the creation of such organs unavailable in the
hands and minds of men like Chiluba and those who rally behind
them, we should remind, not only those who are young and growing
and can make the same error in judgement that Chiluba is making,
but the likes of the Chilubas as well, that, if one cannot run
a million-dollar company, then one cannot, and should not run
a multi-trillion-dollar undertaking, which a country is, unless
he wishes to bestow extinction upon those who ensure his survival,
his own progeny, and, by connection, upon himself.
Though
this dumbness is unbelievable, only comparable to the twist
in face that the man has perfected over the years, an attempt,
in my view, to look as important as the man thinks the position
requires, we already know that individuals can become this self-destructive,
this obtuse. Ridicule or criticism will not, and cannot change
them nor prevent them from destroying their own nests. The men
who engage in such acts are, like the expressions they affect,
too far from reality to be reached. This is also true of the
organizations in which they form a majority, including the OAU
which, though founded by bright, ambitious minds for greater
purposes, has over the years fallen into the hands of such people,
a fact that has been commented upon by many Africans before.
Rather, we should try to educate our inchoate, our susceptible,
those who, unlike the Chilubas of this world, are still malleable,
in a way that makes them see themselves as participants in a
whole that not only has a present, but has a past and a future.
We should make them aware of their positioning in this whole,
and make them see the connection this has to the reason they
have to propagate to survive, the very reason they are here
today, and try, by this way, to make them aware of the reason
they are suffering today, and make them see that the only way
to change this is to observe this simple fact of organization.
In
the west today, this mode of thought is the norm. Reaching this
state was not easy for them either, neither are they taking
it for granted. It is an ongoing process that needs constant
attention lest holes develop in its design. In Europe today,
a cheap crook never imagines becoming president of one such
country, a common thing in Africa. Simple minded, foolish souls
stay in the places where they fit. They either lead criminal
organizations or start legitimate or illegitimate businesses.
They know by instinct where they belong. In the cases where
criminal minded, cheap crooks make the high office in the west,
they usually bring with them sufficient leadership potentials
and qualifications that do not make them stand out among the
others in the organization, and usually in the west, the advantages
of having such persons in positions of power far outweigh the
disadvantages. This state is what Africa has to aspire to achieve.
Mukazo
Mukazo Vunda.