| |
The mid-term exam was held on three sessions according to the
following timetable:
Date
|
Time
|
Exam type
|
Section
|
9-May-2005 |
15:30-18:30 |
Practical (computer-based) |
Monday |
10-May-2005 |
14:00-17:00 |
Practical (computer-based) |
Tuesday |
15-May-2005 |
13:00-14:00 |
Written (paper-based) |
Monday+Tuesday |
Exam material includes:
- For the practical part: sessions 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4.
- For the theoretical part: lectures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
- Click here to view the
practical exam and its model solution.
- Click here to view the
written exam and its model solution.
- Written part: 6-June-2005, 14:00-15:00
- Practical part: 6-June-2005, 15:30-18:30
Exam material includes:
- For the practical part: all lab sessions 0-7.
- For the theoretical part: all lectures 1-9.
- General information about ideas said in seminars (those delivered by
students and invited speakers).
- Click here to view the practical exam and its model solution.
- Click here to view
the written exam and its model solution.
You have the choice of making a project or presenting a seminar. You should
know, however, that doing a seminar is likely to give you more marks.
Either way, you need to make your choice of topic no later than
22-May-2005. If you do not choose a topic by
then, one will be assigned to you by the instructor. Choosing your own topic
will give you extra credit. A roster for scheduled seminars and projects will be
posted here soon.
For a topic that requires considerable work, two partners are allowed to
cooperate and to present a joint work.
You can come for consultation with me whenever you see me in the lab.
It is OK to use references for your work from the internet, provided that you
get my approval for them, and that you document the web address of your source.
Seminar versus Project
- As mentioned earlier, doing a seminar is likely to give you more grades
than a project. Of course, if you perform badly on your seminar you do not
get to have a high mark automatically.
- For the seminar, you'll need to make a PowerPoint presentation in front
of an audience made up of your colleagues and whoever wishes to attend. As
for the project, no presentation is required, and your work is to be
submitted either in electronic form or on paper.
- How do you choose a seminar topic? First, there is a pool of proposed
topics below, from which you can
choose a topic of your liking. If you don't like any of the topics you see,
you may propose one of your own.
- Whatever your choice of topic might be, try to make it as much relevant
as possible to the themes of our course, and to present ideas we did not
come across during our work.
- After choosing your topic, you'll need to research your topic, and
gather resources, you can consult me if you're having trouble finding what
you're looking for.
- The presentation you'll make needs to be prepared on
PowerPoint. If you
have no prior experience in using this software, or if you face difficulties
using it, you can ask me for help.
- Try to make your presentation suitable for a general science audience,
so don't get too technical, or too mathematical.
- Limit the time of your presentation to no more than
15 minutes, and no
less than 10.
- We mean by project here a scientific paper, in which you solve a
physical problem that at some stage requires the use of a computer, like the kind
of problems you worked on in the lab
sheets. If you propose a different format, we'll discuss it together and
decide its feasibility.
- Choose a problem whose solution at one stage or another requires the use
of a computer. Avoid choosing problems in which the use of a computer is
redundant.
- Choose your problem from whatever field in physics you like.
- Interesting and involved problems are preferred to trivial ones.
- Write your paper according to the
specifications of a
scientific paper. Not adhering to the criteria
of writing a scientific paper will harm your mark.
- You can hand in your work as an electronic file (preferably a
Mathematica notebook), or in paper form. But in either case, you'll need
to supply me with workable versions of all code you've used in your
programmes.
- Linux: scientific oriented applications on Linux.
- Java and Java Applets: Simulation, and more.
- FORTRAN and its libraries.
- MATLAB.
- Maple.
- MathCAD.
- Parallel computing, super computers...etc.
- Quantum computing.
- Nano-technology.
- Scientific typesetting; TEX (LATEX),
MathML, and software like MathType and Mathematica.
- CUPS: simulation programmes in physics.
- The GNU project.
- Monte-Carlo method (in numerical analysis).
- Interfacing a PC with a lab instrument; using MathLink.
-
Optica (an external Mathematica package).
-
Experimental Data Analyst (an external
Mathematica package).
-
Advanced Topics in Mathematica.
Student(s) |
Topic |
Date |
سوسن مالك |
Quantum computing |
31-May |
سوسن الأطرش وسرى أبو قمر |
MATLAB |
5-June |
هالة مسعود وربى الزعبي |
Nano-technology |
Project |
رشا أبو الرز وكاسترو أبو غياضة |
CUPS (classical mechanics) |
31-May |
وئام الشوملي وأمل الرفوع |
Maple |
2-June |
أحلام النمروطي وزينب الشمري |
Optica (a Mathematica package) |
5-June |
أمل أبو صالح |
MathCAD |
5-June |
عائشة حسين |
Linux |
31-May |
رشا الحواتمة وباسمة الحيصة |
CUPS (electromagnetism) |
5-June |
بثينة زياد وابتهال طلال |
Parallel computing and super
computers |
5-June |
نعمة الحواتمة وأماني محارب |
GNU |
5-June |
لانا طروم |
FORTRAN |
5-June |
أحمد السعودي وخالد أبو صبحية |
CUPS (solid state physics) |
5-June |
أنوار الصبيحات ومنار الخزاعي |
CUPS (modern physics) |
Project |
زياد القضاة وأسماء الطلافيح |
Monte Carlo
method |
2-June |
The mark you'll get for the seminar will be based on your overall
performance and the quality of the material you deliver. In particular, the
following categories will be observed:
-
How well prepared you are, and how well you seem to know your
material.
-
Clarity of presentation; remember that what you say will be
part of the material for the final!
-
Structure and coherence of ideas presented.
-
The ability of the ideas presented to cover the basics of the
topic adequately.
-
Use of examples is preferred by not mandatory.
-
The ability to answer questions from the floor.
The final project here is a scientific paper, and as such it needs
to comply with the conventional criteria of such a work. In particular,
evaluation will look for:
-
The ability of the paper to answer the main topic to which it
is addressed.
-
Coherence of ideas, and a good clear logical structure and
presentation.
-
A competent and rich analysis (if applicable).
-
Adherence to the
criteria of writing scientific papers.
|