Panzerfaust
WW II German Infantry Anti-Tank Weapons
Page 4: Production and Destruction Figures, Foreign Use


General Production and Destruction Figures
Here are some figures on the production of the weapons discussed later.

Table 1: Overall Production

 Production Figures

       1943 

        1944 

1945   (Jan, Feb, Mar) 

        Total 
 Faustpatrone

123,900

1,418,300

12,000

1,554,200

 Panzerfaust 30, 60, 100, 150 

227,800

4,120,500

2,351,800

6,700,100

 Panzerschreck, RPzB.54 (-12/1944)  
 and RPzB.54/1 (1945)

50,835

238,316

25,744

289,151

 Panzerschreck ammunition 
 (RPzB.Gr. 4322 and 4992)

173,000

1,805,400

240,000

2,218,400

Most notable is the huge amount of Panzerfausts produced. What makes these production figures even more impressive is the fact that nearly all of those were indeed issued to troops: in March 1945 the german forces possessed 3,018 million Panzerfausts, of which only 271,000 were stored in armories, the rest was distributed among the fighting forces. The overall production of the german Panzerfaust variants (Faustpatrone and Panzerfaust 30, 60, 100 and 150) is therefore 8,254,300.

soldiers armed with PzFaustHowever not all of these were usable, and production was not perfect: For example, in 1944 247,200 Panzerfausts out of the July production batch had to be recalled from the frontline units because of serious faults in the used material. Those excluded, the army aquirers refused acceptance of another 453,000 during the course of the war due to various reasons; another 130,900 were returned from the troops themselves because of flaws (the Panzerschreck ammunition didn't fare much better, to the contrary: 285,000 (12.9%) were rejected by the weapon's bureau of the army, and another 32,400 were returned by the frontline units due to various faults).

faustpatrone on paradeStill the astonishing number of over 7.4 million Panzerfausts in army use remains, and especially in later war years there was almost an abundance of these weapons among the troops when compared to the extreme shortages of everything else.

Again, these production figures can be considered accurate; much less certainty can be expected from the reported tank kills from frontline battle reports. The fog of war often leads to exaggerated claims or on the contrary to unreported kills. This should be kept in mind when taking a look at the following statistics.

Table 2: Reported Tank Kills along the Eastern Front

total kills of enemy armor 
Eastern Front 1944
  January    February      March      April      Total  comparison: amount of the respective 
anti-tank weapons supplied to the 
troops in these four months
total # of killed tanks

4,727

2,273

2,663

2,878

12,541

cause known

3,670

1,905

1,031

1,524

8,130

by Faustpatrone / 
Panzerfaust

58

45

51

110

262

Faustpatrone 30 and Panzerfaust 30: 656,300

by Panzerschreck

9

24

29

26

88

RPz.Gr. 4322 and 4992: 278,100

by Hafthohlladung

21

13

14

19

67

by hand grenade

6

5

5

6

22

by Tellermine

20

4

43

11

78

Looking at these figures the effectiveness of the Panzerfaust suddenly seems entirely dubious. Tank kills by the established AT weapons such as tanks and AT guns were predominant. Although many of the unknown tank kills can likely be kills by soldiers with Panzerfausts who did not get to report it; another explanation is that the Panzerfausts due to their demolition effect were most often used as super-handgrenades against infantry in buildings etc. Finally, the major factor probably is that these figures are from early 1944 when the weapon was still quite new; therefore, most of the supplied Panzerfausts were probably still in the process of getting distributed, equipping forces equally throughout the theater and generally establishing a basic stock of these weapons.
 
 

Foreign Use

finnish soldiers with PzFaustPanzerfaust and Panzerschreck weapons were also supplied in considerable quantities to germany's allies during WW II. Romania was given a considerable amount of the Panzerfaust klein to help shore up their evident lack of AT capability a little bit. Finland also was supplied with the german AT weapon designs. The picture at left shows finnish soldiers armed with the Panzerfaust 30 late in WW II (click here to learn more about the finnish use of Panzerfaust weapons) , below you see an RPzB.54 (along with an RPz.Gr. 4322 round) in finnish use (more finnish WW II pictures). The finnish designations were F1 for the Panzerfaust klein and F2 for the larger Panzerfaust 30. In 1944, 28,500 of both types were supplied to the fins. The fins proved to be quite effective tank killers with the Panzerfaust.

finnish PzSchreck

The Soviets too realized the potential of these weapons. Although the russian military was reportedly not very enthusiastic about the lend-lease Bazookas which they had received in little numbers in 1943, they took a liking to the bigger Panzerschreck and the late-war Panzerfaust types. The russians usually referred to both the Panzerfaust and the Panzerschreck simply as "Fausts". The following information is to be taken with care as this issue is still rather sketchy. Apparently, captured german Panzerfaust weapons supposedly were used under the designation RPG-1; the captured german factories kept producing Panzerfausts for the soviets even after the war. Immediately after the war the russians further developed the Panzerfaust 150 design into the RPG-2. This eventually lead to the better known RPG-3 series.

Other more or less straight copies of the Panzerfaust and the Panzerschreck were the swedish post-war pansarskott m/46 and raketgevär m/49 or m/51 respectively.

Copies of the german Panzerfaust weapons were also produced in neutral Switzerland during the war to equip the swiss army.

 
 
Previous Page : Panzerschreck                     Main Page              Next Page : Machine Guns            

© 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 created by M.Hofbauer August 29th 1998; document ver. 1.4 mod 150102
This page has been constructed with own material as far as possible, the third party images and information used herein are public domain to the best of my knowledge. The author went to considerable lengths to ensure accordance with the rights of copyright owners where applicable; respective consent is documented. If you feel injured in your rights by / take offense at - any part of this page's content contact me immediately for redress / possible removal of the respective part.