Racist Fools cause fireing Fire Him! He is right but not politically correct Intolerant Blacks say battle flag racist
Caucasian couple denied negro adoption


Pink Panther

 I believe most racists are ignorant fools. I believe the following news articles proves many of them are negroes. (Please note: The word ''niggard'' is from old English and old Norwegian roots, and means a cheap or miserly person. It is in no way a racial slur, and does not mean negro. Any educated person would know this.) 

04:02 AM ET 01/27/99
D.C. Mayor's Aide Resigns Over Word
By NANCY ZUCKERBROD=
Associated Press Writer=
WASHINGTON (AP) _ The city's new mayor accepted the resignation of a member of his staff because of complaints he used a racial epithet. But even as he stepped down, David Howard, who is white said the word he used _ ``niggardly'' _ does not have any racial connotation.
       ``Mr. Howard's resignation was prompted by reports that he made an inappropriate racial comment,'' Mayor Anthony Williams said in a statement Tuesday night. ``He didn't say anything that was in itself racist,'' Williams  told reports, but he added that what Howard said showed poor judgment. ``Good judgment is required in executive positions.'' In a separate statement, Howard identified the word he used as ``niggardly'' and said he was referring to a fund he administers. Howard said it means ``miserly.''
       Webster's Tenth Edition concurs, defining it as mean about spending or granting.'' The dictionary dates its use to the late 16th century.
       Because the word sounds like a racial epithet, Howard said, he realized other members of the mayor's staff present when he made the remark were offended. He said he quickly apologized. But he said that since he made the remark on Jan. 15, he has received many angry phone calls from people who thought he made a racist remark. About two-thirds of the capital city's half million population is black.
       ``I would never think of making a racist remark,'' said Howard, whose job was to hear the concerns of district residents and bring them to the attention of the mayor and his staff. ``I realize that this rumor has severely compromised my effectiveness as the district's public advocate and, in the best interest of my office, I resigned.''
      In accepting Howard's resignation, Williams said, ``We're trying to bring our city together.''
       The mayor, who is black, said he is ``troubled by recent news stories about race _ questions about whether I'm black enough or have too many advisors who are not.''
       Williams said the issue reflects a ``hurt'' and ``great divide'' within the city and that race relations must be talked about openly in the nation's capital.

I firmly believe the only racists involved in the news account above are the people making baselesss accusations against a completely innocent caucasian, a man who was hounded from his job by ignorant racists. Racism transcends race. I believe it is fed by ignorance and lack of common sense. I believe some of the worst racist in the country are people such as Rev. Sharpton, Jackson, and, especially, Farikan. May God have mercy on us all.
Some more--Bill Maher brought this up on the 27Jan99 Politically Incorrect. I think it is very rare for him to say something that makes sense or is intelligent, but he was right on on this one. In response to a really stupid statement by David Wyndorf, who sounded like an idiot who had burned his brains out on drugs after having failed the first grade, Bill asked if "we should dumb down to the idiots that don't know the words?" On that show he seemed to have to one dumb and two foolish liberals telling the intelligent Melanie Griffin how dumb she was.

I believe the next article shows you had better not tell the truth about a minority if the truth is not good and you are a caucasian. Every racist of whatever ethnic group, and every knee-jerk liberal in the country is going to attempt to crucify you. 

04:46 AM ET 03/01/99

N.J. Police Superintendent Is Fired

 N.J. Police Superintendent Is Fired
 By S. MITRA KALITA=
 Associated Press Writer=
           TRENTON, N.J. (AP) _ Less than two weeks ago, Gov. Christie
 Whitman stood firmly behind New Jersey's top cop when a black
 ministers' group demanded his resignation, citing a racial
 profiling controversy.
           But after State Police Superintendent Col. Carl A. Williams Jr.
 was quoted in The Star-Ledger of Newark on Sunday as saying that
 minorities were more likely to be involved in drug crimes, Whitman
 swiftly fired him.
           ``The comments were insensitive and absolutely counter to
 bolstering confidence in law enforcement,'' said Whitman's
 spokesman, Pete McDonough. ``There are vast segments of the New
 Jersey public whose confidence in the system is shaken.''
           The state Council of Black Ministers and the state chapter of
 the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People had
 been calling for Williams' ouster for weeks, saying he wasn't
 acknowledging a history of racist practices on the part of the
 state police.
           Minority groups say Williams stated what a lot of his colleagues
 probably believe.
           ``If these feelings are of the state superintendent, one can
 only imagine how deep they may be among the rank and file,'' said
 the Rev. Reginald Jackson, executive director of the Black
 Ministers Council of New Jersey.
           Williams and the State Police have come under fire over
 allegations that the agency practices racial profiling, targeting
 minorities for traffic stops. The issue was inflamed by the April
 1998 shooting of three minority men during a stop on the New Jersey
 Turnpike. Troopers said they fired on the unarmed men in a van
 because the vehicle was backing up at them.
           In The Star-Ledger interview, Williams said he did not condone
 racial profiling, but said it is naive to think race is not an
 issue in drug crimes.
           ``Two weeks ago, the president of the United States went to
 Mexico to talk to the president of Mexico about drugs. He didn't go
 to Ireland. He didn't go to England,'' Williams said.
           ``Today with this drug problem, the drug problem is cocaine or
 marijuana. It is most likely a minority group that's involved with
 that,'' said Williams. ``They aren't going to ask some Irishman to
 be a part of their (gang) because they don't trust them.''
           But he said some generalizations can be made. ``If you're
 looking at the methamphetamine market, that seems to be controlled
 by the motorcycle gangs, which are basically predominantly white,''
 he said. ``If you're looking at heroin and stuff like that, your
 involvement there is more or less Jamaicans.''
           Whitman said the state's law enforcement system must be carried
 out free of bias. She said Williams' comments ``are inconsistent
 with our efforts to enhance public confidence in the state
 police.''
           ``His views are dastardly, his thoughts are ill and sickened,
 and he's unfit to hold such a critical, important office that
 protects,'' said Assemblyman LeRoy D. Jones. ``He's a racist in the
 worst kind because he doesn't even know it.''
           Williams, 58, was tapped for the $89,963 superintendent post in
 1994. He has been in law enforcement for almost 35 years. Williams
 was not available for comment, and a State Police spokesman did not
 return messages seeking comment.
           Last week, The Associated Press reported that The Justice
 Department's Civil Rights Division has been investigating New
 Jersey's state police for two years.
           Earlier this year, State Attorney General Peter Verniero ordered
 his office to review State Police policies to determine if troopers
 engage in racial profiling and to ensure that ``all policies
 promote fairness.''

Most of the people who fought under the CSA Battle Flag had never owned slaves, and all competent educated people know the Civil War was about states rights, not slavery. The following article shows how someone probably educated (I may be wrong) can use the ignorance of others for political gain. 

07:47 PM ET 03/04/99

Rebel Flag Removed From Ala. House

 Rebel Flag Removed From Ala. House
           MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) _ A black legislator declared victory
 Thursday when the Confederate battle flag was removed from the
 Alabama House chamber.
           House Clerk Greg Pappas quietly removed the battle banner and
 replaced it with the ``stars and bars'' of the Confederate national
 flag before the legislative session began Tuesday.
           ``Good riddance,'' said state Rep. Alvin Holmes, a Democrat who
 also fought successfully to remove the battle flag from atop
 Alabama's Capitol.
           The Confederate battle flag, criticized for its ties to slavery,
 is the familiar rebel flag with a red background and the blue
 diagonal stripes containing 13 white stars.
           The ``stars and bars'' looks more like the U.S. flag. It has a
 blue square in the upper left hand corner that contains a circle of
 seven white stars, which represent the first seven states to join
 the Confederacy. The remainder of the flag has three broad stripes,
 two red and one white.
           The House has repeatedly voted down attempts to take the battle
 flag away. Pappas said he replaced the flag at Holmes' request. He
 intends to move it across the street from the Statehouse to an old
 House chamber now used for some official ceremonies.
           The battle flag was never displayed on the Senate floor.
           Rep. Mark Gaines, a Republican who in the past opposed removing
 the battle flag from the House chamber, said Pappas made the right
 decision.
           Displaying the Confederate national flag is ``historically
 accurate,'' he said. ``It should end the controversy.''
           The old House chamber is where Jefferson Davis was sworn in as
 president of the Confederacy.
All I can say on the judge's ruling in the case in the following article is, "Come Again?"
Please see my spin on the foolishnes at the end of the article.

02:18 PM ET 03/08/99

White Couple Loses Black Foster Kid

 White Couple Loses Black Foster Kid
 By MIKE ROBINSON=
 Associated Press Writer=
           CHICAGO (AP) _ A 3-year-old boy born with cocaine in his system
 should be taken from the politically prominent couple who have
 served as his foster parents and returned to his mother _ a
 recovering cocaine addict, a judge ruled today.
           The state Department of Children and Family Services had
 recommended that ``Baby T'' stay with Appellate Court Judge Anne
 Burke and her husband, Alderman Edward Burke, one of the most
 powerful men in Chicago politics.
           The boy has spent all but eight days of his life with the
 Burkes, and they had expressed interest in adopting him.
           However, since the boy is black and the Burkes are white, Judge
 Judith M. Brawka held today that the state's recommendation did not
 give enough consideration to the value of African-American culture.
           The judge added that Baby T needs to be with his brother, who is
 also in foster care. The judge had previously ordered the brother
 also returned to their mother, Tina Olison.
           The judge set a goal of returning Baby T to his mother within 12
 months, but she warned Olison that both children could be taken
 away again.
           ``Just as your addiction lasted for years, I must tell you that
 this case may not close for a significant period of time,'' she
 said.
           Olison, who is in her late 30s, sat silently throughout today's
 hearing. The Burkes were not in the courtroom.
           Olison successfully underwent treatment for her drug addiction
 and has sued to regain custody of Baby T and her older son, who is
 being cared for by a grandmother.
           The state failed in November to have Olison ruled an unfit
 mother.
By extension, if the right of a caucasian couple to adopt a negro baby can be denied because the child will lose out on "African American culture", (which often equates to slum culture.) than Americans should not be allowed to adopt Russian, Korean, etc. orphans because they will be denied their culture. And an "English American" should certainly never be allowed to adopt an "Italian American." Sounds like hogwash to me. How about you?

Opinion Page

HomePage Opinion section