Cyrillus and the Church of Jerusalem did not acknowledge the book of Revelation in their period. Apart from this, the name of this book does not even occur in the list of Canonical books which he wrote.
[New Testament canons through the ages]

The Catholic Herald (1844) contains the following statement on page 206 of Volume 7:

“Rose has written on page 161 of his book that many Protestant scholars consider the book of Revelation nonbelievable. Professor Ewald has produced powerful arguments to prove that the gospel of John and Epistles of John and the Revelations of John cannot be the writings of the same person.”

Eusebius makes the following statement in chapter 25 (Vol. 7) of his history:

“Dionysius says that some ancient writers excluded the book of Revelation from the Holy Scriptures and have completely refuted it. He said that this book is meaningless and a great example of ignorance. Any association of this book with John or with a righteous man or with any Christian is wrong. In fact, a heretic Cerinthus attributed this book to John. I wish I had the powers of excluding it from Holy Scriptures.”

  • "Behold, I am coming like thief! Blessed is the one who stays awake and is clothed, not going about naked and exposed to shame." - Revelation 16: 15
  • "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly. I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep." - The Gospel of John 10: 10/11