light_top

"CARMINE AND ANTHONY'S MOVIE NIGHT PROUDLY PRESENTS FOR SATURDAY OCTOBER 10TH, 2009!"
40x100 Spacer GIF

""NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD 30 ANNIVERSARY EDITION"-It all began over lunch one day when George Romero and his partners in an advertising agency came up with the idea of making a film. Putting in $600 apiece, they brought a case of film and started shooting a film based on a story Romero had written inspired by Richard Matheson’s classic vampire novel I Am Legend (1954), filmed as The Last Man on Earth (1964), The Omega Man (1971) and I Am Legend (2007). The Image Ten partners, as they called themselves, shopped about for finance and managed to raise a $114,000 budget. Night of the Living Dead, released in 1968, was the result. It was immediately hailed as a genuine horror classic and became an unexpected success to all concerned and one of the most successful independent features ever made at the time, earning some $12 million in box-office rentals. A print was even added to the permanent collection at the Museum of Modern Art. (On a disappointing note though, George Romero and associates saw little of the success, their naiveté in the world of distribution deals leaving the distributors walking away with all profits). Night of the Living Dead is a film that breaks about every convention and taboo conceivable – it has themes of cannibalism; even patricide where we see a child feasting on its mother’s corpse at one point. Even the idea of a Black hero at the time was something new and revolutionary (although George Romero insists that there was so significance to it – Duane Jones was merely the best actor for the part they had available to them. Whatever the case, the film set up many racial resonances). Night of the Living Dead is a horror film where all classical conventions have been shot out. In horror movies of the 1930s, 40s and 50s there was a sense of overriding morality, that the hero and the romantic interest would always survive and that whatever force threatening society there was would invariably be vanquished by the Army, divine provenance or heroic decency and ingenuity. But in Night of the Living Dead, Romero shoots out all sense of any overriding morality that there usually is in a horror film, there are none of the usual securities that both horror film protagonists and audiences are given. Here the innocents and antagonists get butchered alike. The girl who looks like the nominal heroine at the outset, instead of becoming the romantic interest, quite realistically spends almost the entire film in catatonic shock at what she saw. And in one of the most amazingly black endings imaginable, the hero manages to survive the night and emerges from the farmhouse to greet the return of civilized law and order as a sheriff’s posse arrives, only to be shot by them, thinking he is a zombie. What is most disturbing about all of this is that there is no explanation given for the horror – there are one or two offered by the scientists, the rationalizing saviours of the previous decade, but they as much in the dark as the characters are. It is all existential horror – horror that exists solely in terms of naked effect, discarded of classical conventions of drama, morality and explanation. The progenitor of these type of films was Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963), in which birds suddenly turn on humanity and start attacking en masse, but with no clear explanation offered as to why. This was followed by other films such as Steven Spielberg’s Duel (1971), Deliverance (1972) and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974), which feature brutal assaults on ordinary people out of the blue without rhyme or reason offered as to why. Other films of the era such as Blow Up (1966) and The Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975) similarly set up mysteries to which they deliberately never provide solutions. Night of the Living Dead, with its sense of society being occluded and overrun by an irrational force that is devouring and tearing it apart, seems to potently echo the enormous sense of social upheaval that the US was going through in the late 1960s with assassinations of public figures, student riots and Vietnam protests. Night of the Living Dead has become George Romero’s most acclaimed film, a point he has never surpassed, even though he has made a number of other excellent films. In terms of style Romero was still sharpening his directorial skills and at times his direction is somewhat melodramatic and forced. The entry into the house, the discovery of the body on the stairs is shot with a staccato starkness in the black-and-white lighting effects and jagged camera angles of the old German silents and with the somewhat forced, didactic canned score out of 1940s film noir. The effect is rather crude here, as it is in other places. On the other hand there are also a number of remarkable scenes where Romero evinces a starkly effective horror – the picture of the zombified little girl getting up and coming after her mother with arms outstretched and later found feasting on her body; the scene with Duane Jones trapped outside the house, facing the circle of zombies all on his own, with Karl Hardman refusing to let him back into the house; and the climactic break-in with Judith O’Dea being dragged through broken boards by her hair only to see her brother now as a zombie. The real classic scene though is the opening with the zombie attacking Johnny and coming after Barbara. It’s a classic scene because it plays against so many conventions – it starts with the ordinary – Johnny complaining about having to visit their parent’s grave and his teasing her “They’re coming to get you, Barbara” – only to have the tables turn on him. We are without any warning suddenly plunged into a nightmare, one that has the sense of everything going wrong – the zombie battering around the car, and fate perpetually tripping Barbara up – losing her shoe as she runs, getting into the car to find that she doesn’t have the keys. We have no idea why this is happening – this is only the first scene and its out-of-the-blue unexpectedness makes it all the more disturbing. A colorized version of Night of the Living Dead was released in 1987. In 1998, Night of the Living Dead – The Thirtieth Anniversary Version was released featuring new footage shot especially for the occasion by original co-writer John A. Russo. This expands the beginning in detailing how the man who attacks Barbara and Johnny rises from the dead during a funeral, plus an ending with a preacher ranting about the zombies. While interesting, whether these scenes add anything to a classic is dubious and the result was certainly detested by all fans of the original. There were three Night of the Living Dead sequels made by George Romero:– Dawn of the Dead/Zombies – Dawn of the Dead (1979) in which he expanded the idea out into a splatter epic that became a cult hit; the less successful but highly underrated Day of the Dead (1985); and Romero’s belated return to the subject matter with Land of the Dead (2005) and the mockumentary styled Diary of the Dead (2007) and its sequel ... of the Dead (2009). Romero later wrote and produced a remake, Night of the Living Dead (1990), making some interesting updates on the screenplay, and turning the directorial reins over to Tom Savini, who was responsible for the way out splatter effects on Dawn and Day. There was a further remake with Night of the Living Dead 3D (2006). Due to complicated copyright wrangling, Romero parted ways with John Russo, Russell Streiner and Karl Hardman with both parties attaining the right to make further Dead sequels. John A. Russo attempted for several years to mount his own sequel but then sold the rights whereupon a sequel, Return of the Living Dead (1985), was made by Dan O’Bannon, who rung up some interesting variations in his sarcastically black comic treatment. This was a success and spawned four sequels, the lame Return of the Living Dead Part II (1988), the interesting Return of the Living Dead III (1993), Return of the Living Dead 4: Necropolis (2005) and Return of the Living Dead 5: Rave to the Grave (2005). Dawn of the Dead was also later remade as Dawn of the Dead (2004) and Day of the Dead as Day of the Dead (2008). Day of the Dead had its own spinoff with Day of the Dead 2: Contagium (2005), although this is more like a prequel to Night of the Living Dead. Romero discusses the making of Night of the Living Dead in the documentaries Document of the Dead (1989) and The American Nightmare (2000). George A. Romero’s subsequent genre films were:– Jack’s Wife/Season of the Witch (1972) about suburban witchcraft; The Crazies (1973), an underrated film about a madness-inducing biospill; Martin (1976), a superb deconstruction of the cinematic vampire myth; Dawn of the Dead/Zombies – Dawn of the Dead (1979); the Stephen King horror comic homage Creepshow (1982); Day of the Dead (1985); Monkey Shines (1988) about a psychic link between a paraplegic and a murderous monkey; Two Evil Eyes (1990), an Edgar Allan Poe collaboration with Dario Argento; The Dark Half (1993), from the Stephen King novel about a writer haunted by an evil doppelganger; Bruiser (2000) about a man whose face suddenly becomes a blank mask; Land of the Dead (2005) and Diary of the Dead (2007). Romero has also produced the Tales from the Darkside (1983-5) and Monsters (1988-9) horror anthology series. His scripts include Creepshow II (1987), Tales from the Darkside: The Movie (1990) and the Night of the Living Dead remake (1990). Co-writer Russell Streiner went onto a minor career as a director and novelist. His films as director are Midnight (1981), Midnight 2 (1993), Heartstopper (1993) and Santa Claws (1996). Russo also wrote the screenplays for Voodoo Dawn (1990) and The Majorettes (1987), based on his novel. John A. Russo has even written a book about low-budget filmmaking, How to Make Your Own Feature for $10,000 Or Less (1995).

40x100 Spacer GIF
"FIDDLER ON THE ROOF"-Fiddler on the Roof was inarguably one of the most beloved stage musicals of the second half of the 20th century. Based on a series of short stories by Ukranian writer Sholom Aleichem (the "Jewish Mark Twain"), the Harold Prince production opened on Broadway in September 1964. More than seven years later, when Norman Jewison's screen version was released, millions around the world were already familiar with the story of Tevye and his family. The motion picture adaptation further widened Fiddler on the Roof's audience and increased interest in the long-running play. During the heyday of the Hollywood musical, the genre was split into two distinct classes. The first is the lightweight comedy, with bright song-and-dance numbers punctuating nearly every key scene and an ending brimming with joy. While there's no shortage of examples of this sort of film, one of the best-known is Singin' in the Rain. Then there's the epic musical, which features a dramatically solid plot, more serious subject matter, and a finale that's often a shade less than triumphant. The Sound of Music stands as a memorable representative of this kind of movie, and it's in that category that Fiddler on the Roof belongs. The original cut of this film ran about three hours (with an intermission). For a late-1970s re-release, 30 minutes were trimmed, resulting in a leaner version that retained all of the songs and plot points, but lost a few character details. As expected, the motion picture edition differs from its theatrical parent in a number of apparent ways. First and foremost is the tone. Jewison believed that, since film is an inherently "real" medium, the light, irreverent approach of the play might strike a dissonant chord with movie-goers. After all, some of the story material is serious in nature. Consequently, he opted for a more somber style, letting comedy give way to gravity as the anti-Jewish sentiment rises. Also, as is frequently the case with stage-to-screen adaptations, the production is "opened up." Not confined to the inside of an auditorium, Jewison was free to build his own version of the town of Anatevka, which gives greater scope to everything from the opening number, "Tradition," to the concluding exodus. Fiddler on the Roof takes place around 1910 in a small Ukranian village. It is an uncertain time. Unrest grips the country - unrest caused by the Pogroms (when Jews were driven en masse from their homes), rising anti-Tsarist sentiment (which would lead to the Revolution), and the approach of World War One. The historical realities of the time do not simply provide a colorful backdrop to this story; they are central to all that transpires. A central theme is how the old traditions are disintegrating under the pressure of a world culture that is being re-shaped by industrialization and mechanization. One of those traditions is the means by which Jews have been married: a matchmaker chooses a wife for a man, the girl's father approves the match, and the ceremony is held. That's how Tevye (Topol) and his wife, Golde (Norma Crane), were united, and that's how the hard-working milkman believes his five daughters should find their husbands. But Tzeitel (Rosalind Harris) has other, modern ideas. She spurns Tevye's selection of a mate, the wealthy butcher Lazar Wolf (Paul Mann), in favor of her childhood sweetheart, the poor tailor Motel (Leonard Frey). Reluctantly, Tevye eventually assents to her choice, but, in doing so, he acknowledges the freedom of all his children. Subsequently, his second daughter, Hodel (Michele Marsh), decides to marry a young revolutionary, Perchik (Paul Michael Glaser). And Tzeitel and Hodel's younger sister, Chava (Neva Small), falls in love with a non-Jew by the name of Fyedka (Raymond Lovelock). This is one match that Tevye cannot countenance, and he warns of dire consequences if Chava goes through with the marriage. During his opening monologue, which Tevye directs at the audience, the beleaguered man likens living in Anatevka to being a fiddler making music while perched precariously on a rooftop. His words are prophetic, at least for the Jewish segment of the community. While poverty is an endurable hardship, a Cossack attack is not. From early in the film, it is apparent that nothing short of divine intervention will prevent the population of Anatevka from being torn apart, and this is not the kind of story to resort to a deus ex machina resolution. History and foreshadowing conspire to illuminate the inevitable ending long before it is shown. As with any musical, the focus never strays far from the songs, and Fiddler on the Roof contains a number of instantly recognizable numbers, from the lively and uplifting "Tradition," "If I Were a Rich Man," and "To Life" to the delightful "Matchmaker" and the sublime "Sunrise, Sunset." In all, the film contains more than a dozen songs. Jewison does his best to incorporate them seamlessly into the storyline, which causes "Matchmaker" and "Sunrise, Sunset" to be more subdued than in many stage productions. However, those in search of a particularly rousing rendition need look no further than "If I Were a Rich Man." The casting of Topol as Tevye was somewhat controversial at the time, especially among the play's many American fans, who were backing the legendary Zero Mostel (Broadway's Tevye). Jewison was open about the reasons he chose Topol over Mostel, who was also in the running. The director felt that the latter's broadly comedic approach to the role might not translate well to the screen. In addition, he was looking for either a first or second generation Russian Jew - a qualification met by Topol, but not Mostel. By the time he made the movie, Topol was already familiar with the role, having played it in London and Tel Aviv productions. His performance, which garnered him a Best Actor nomination, is both bigger than life and deeply human, and provides the glue that hold the movie together. Topol is effectively supported by a diverse, international cast. Rosalind Harris, Michele Marsh, and Neva Small play Tevye's three marriage-age daughters, and the late Norma Crane is his wife. Leonard Frey (Boys in the Band) brought his interpretation of the lovestruck-but-timid Motel from Broadway to the screen. The venerable Molly Picon took on the key role of Yente, the matchmaker, and stage actor-turned-drama teacher Paul Mann is the bug-eyed Lazar Wolf. Finally, Paul Michael Glaser, who was to go on to become a TV star (as Starsky in "Starsky and Hutch") and a motion picture director (The Cutting Edge), is Perchik, who fans the flames of change that sweep through Anatevka. Fiddler on the Roof is not a perfect motion picture - it is too long and there are times when it's obvious that the musical numbers have been pre-recorded then lip-synched - but it represents an enjoyable three hours (or two-and-a-half, depending on the version). Jewison's attention to detail is undeniable - great care was taken to represent Jewish customs as accurately as possible. The cinematography (by Oswald Morris, who won an Oscar) is gorgeous, starting with a glorious sunrise over Anatevka and concluding with a long-distance view of Tevye and his family silhouetted against a slate-gray sky. For Fiddler on the Roof, Jewison, who had previously gained notice with such films as The Cincinnati Kid and In the Heat of the Night, and who would go on to make ...And Justice for All and Moonstruck, immersed himself in the material, creating an effective and enduring cinematic representation of a great play.

""THE MOST POWERFUL MOVIE MUSICAL EVER MADE!"-Pauline Kael

"AN OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENT IN EVERY CATEGORY!"-Boxoffice

40x100 Spacer GIF

light_rule

LINKS

dark_bullet2 DVD Review

dark_bullet2 TV Guide Movie Database

dark_bullet2 Internet Movie Database Search

dark_bullet2 Men On The Net


40x100 Spacer GIF

Jellybean Jar

Email me!


light_bottom

Intel Link 300x1 Spacer GIF GeoCities