WiMax - What I should know about it?
WiMax - Introduction
WiMax (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) is a wireless broadband technology,which supports point to multi-point (PMP) broadband wireless access over a coverage area of 3 – 5 miles. WiMax is another name for the 802.16 IEEE wireless broadband standard. The technology can support access rates up to 2+ Mbps. WiMax can solve a problem called the “last-mile” problem, by connecting individual homes and business office’s communications.
The standard has a range of up to 30 miles, and can deliver broadband at around 75 megabits per second. This is theoretically, 20 times faster than a commercially available wireless broadband. WiMax can be termed partially a successor to the Wi-Fi protocol, which is measured in feet, and works, over shorter distances. WiMax supports ATM, IPv4, Ipv6, Ethernet, and VLAN services. WiMax offers many choices.
Let us take a peek into the background of this much talked about technology, which is taking the wireless world by storm. Read More…
WiMax – Background
WiMax was a precursor to the original 802.16 standard published in December 2001. WiMax forum was formed in April 2001, an advocacy group, founded by a coalition of companies such as Intel, Nokia and Proxim. The promoters of the WiMax technology expect it to make networks with multimedia applications connect within a range of 30 miles. The forum was formed solely for promotion of devices supported by the 802.16 standard. The forum takes responsibility also to develop devices confirming to the standard and releasing it in the market. This is sometimes also termed as a wireless’ answer to advance IEEE standards for broadband wireless access (BWA) networks. The forum was reportedly planning to bring out its products based on the 802.16 technology sometime last year.
In April 2005, the WiMax promoters talked about a formal agreement with the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). This agreement, reportedly confirmed a single global standard for all wireless metropolitan area network technology. Some prominent members of the WiMax organization are Airspan, Alvarion, Analog Devices, Aperto Networks, Ensemble Communications, Fujitsu, Intel, Nokia, OFDM Forum, Proxim and Wi-LAN.
WiMax - Standards
As discussed earlier, the 802.16, WiMax standard, which was published in March 2002, provided many, updated information on the Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) technology mentioned in the previous version. The extension given in the March publication, extended the line of sight fixed wireless Man standard, focused solely on a spectrum from 10 GHz to 60+ GHz. This extension provides for non-line of sight access in low frequency bands like 2 – 11 GHz. These bands are sometimes unlicensed. This also boosts the maximum distance from 31 to 50 miles and supports PMP and mesh technologies. Interestingly, these standards (PMP and mesh technologies) went unnoticed until the WiMax forum was formed.Lets
see some more into the extensions used by the standards.
Extension
b – This is especially for the quality of service features.
Extension
c – This is for the interoperability and is related to protocols, test suite structures
and test purposes.
Extension
d – This creates system profiles for compliance testing of 802.16a devices.
Extension
e – This is all about the enhancement of Wireless LAN air interface to support
mobile and fixed broadband.
The
base version of the 802.16 standard works in the frequency of 10 – 66 GHz. This
requires line of sight towers. On the
other hand, the 802.16a extension, operates in a lower frequency of 2 – 11 GHz,
and also negates the need of a line of sight tower. This, however, can operate
within 31 miles and offers data transfer rates of 70Mbps.
WiMax
can be used for wireless networking like the popular WiFi. WiMax, a
second-generation protocol, allows higher data rates over longer distances,
efficient use of bandwidth, and avoids interference almost to a minimum. WiMax
operates on licensed and unlicensed frequencies, provides a regulated
environment and gives a feasible economic model for the users. Lets take a peek
into the technology called the fixed wireless. This, fixed wireless, is also
the base concept for the metropolitan area networking (MAN), given in the
802.16 standard.
Now,
in fixed wireless, a backbone of base stations is connected to a public
network. Each of these base stations, supports many fixed subscriber stations, either
public WiFi hot spots or fire walled enterprise networks. These base stations
use the media access control (MAC) layer, and allocate uplink and downlink
bandwidth to subscribers as per their individual needs. This is basically on a
real-time need basis.
The subscriber stations might also be mounted
on rooftops of the users. The MAC layer is a common interface that makes the
networks interoperable. In the future, one can look forward to 802.11 hotspots,
hosted by 802.16 MANs. These would serve as wireless local area networks (LANs)
and would serve the end users directly too. WiMax supporters are focusing on
the broadband “last mile” in unwired areas, and on backhaul for WiFi hotspots.
WiMax is expected to support mobile wireless technology too, wireless
transmissions directly to mobile end users.
Impact
Of WiMax
The
operators, rooting for the WiMax cookie, are in for a surprise. WiMax would
prove to be a double-edged sword. The initial WiMax products would operate
between the frequencies of 2.5 GHz and 5.8GHz. This range includes both the
licensed and unlicensed spectrum. Under the licensed spectrum, the operators
can apply for franchisees for providing fixed wireless broadband. The
unlicensed spectrum would have to make do with independent backhaul services
for hotspots, which would create a wireless network across the nation.
The
operators might be well off trying to offer parallel, integrated services for
WiMax, similar to WiFi offerings. This guarantees a swifter ROI on low upfront
investment. The margins would definitely be lower than cellular rates.
WiMax
– Forum
As
we learnt that WiMax was formed in April 2001, to promote conformance and
interoperability of the standard IEEE 802.16. The Forum’s founding members were
– Ensemble, CrossSpan, Harris and Nokia.
In April 2002, the forum grew to accommodate another member – OFDM, and
in November, added Fujitsu as its sixth member. In March 2003, after intensive
lobbying for the just cause of promoting the standard by Fujitsu and Wi-LAN,
many new members joined the WiMax forum. The new members were – Aperto,
Alvarion, Airspan, Intel, Proxim and others. The current forum has strong
presence from service providers, system manufacturers, chip vendors and
eco-system vendors.
Currently
the WiMax forum has 110 members, and there are no WiMax-certified products
available in the market. In September 2004, Intel introduced initial samples of
a WiMax chipset, named Rosedale. Intel announced plans of offering transmitters
by 2005, and has plans to ship WiMax devices for use in the office and home by
2006.
Recent
News from WiMax Forum
The
WiMax community and its members put together a grand show in Vancouver, Canada.
The main aim was to silence the skeptics and prove that the technology would
sell like hot cakes, once people realize its worth.
WiMax
forum discussions revolve around technology and never around operators. This is
a trap that the Forum members avoid like the plague. It is very critical that
the efficiency of WiMax should not be used only for competition for price and
data services.
IEEE
802.16 – Impact On Wireless Broadband
The
initial version of IEEE 802.16 was developed with the goal of meeting the
requirements of deployment for BWA (Broadband Wireless Access) systems
operating between 10 and 66 GHz. The IEEE does not provide conformance
standards and test specifications. To ensure interoperability between different
vendors and their equipments, the technical working group have now started
working on the 11 GHz part.
The
working groups develop a set of system profiles, Protocol implementation
conformance statement proforma, test suite structure and test purposes, and
abstract test suite specifications for the 10 - 66 GHz as well as the 11 GHz
parts. This is according to the ISO / IEC 9464 series of conformance testing
standards.
An
Overview
The
IEEE 802.16 group has been primarily developing a point-to-multipoint broadband
wireless access standard for systems in a 10 - 66 G Hz and 11 GHz range. It is
interesting to note that the standard covers the MAC (Media Access Control) and
the PHY (Physical) layers.
While
developing the target environment, many PHY considerations were noted and take
into account. Line of sight becomes a must for higher frequencies. This eases
the multi-path effect and allows for wider channels. Interestingly, for sub 11
GHz non line of sight capability is a requirement. Originally the IEEE 802.16
MAC was enhanced to accommodate various PHYs and services, thus taking care of
different environments.
The
IEEE 802.16 standard is versatile enough to accommodate time division
multiplexing (TDM) or frequency division duplexing (FDD) deployments and also
allows for both full and half-duplex terminals.
The
MAC was developed for a point-to-multipoint wireless access environment and can
accommodate futuristic products. This layer supports protocols like ATM,
Ethernet and IP (Internet Protocol). The MAC frame structure dynamic uplink and
downlink profiles of terminals as per the link conditions. This is to ensure a
trade-off of capacity and real-time robustness.
802.16
MAC - An Overview
The
MAC uses a protocol data unit of variable length, which increases the standards
efficiency. Multiple MAC protocol data unit can be sent as a single PHY stream
to save overload. Also, multiple Service data units (SDU) can be sent together
to save on MAC header overhead. By fragmenting, you can send large volumes of
data (SDUs) across frame boundaries and can guarantee a QoS (Quality of
Service) of competing services. The MAC uses a self-correcting bandwidth
request scheme to avoid overhead and acknowledgement delays.
This
also allows better QoS handling than the traditional acknowledged schemes. The
terminals have a variety of options to request for bandwidth depending on the
QoS and other parameters. The signal requirement can be polled or a request can
be piggybacked. More
to come…
WiMax – Architecture
WiMax
has two main topologies – namely Point to Point for backhaul and Point to Multi
Point Base station to Subscriber station. In each of these situations, multiple
input multiple output antennas would be used. In the Subscriber station WiMax
architecture, the wireline connections would link to WiFi access points,
servers, phones, VoIP gateways and optical fiber connections to the Internet.
The
IEEE approved the 802.16 standards in June 2004, and three working groups were
formed to evaluate and rate the standards. The initial development was of a
point to multi point broadband wireless access standards operating in the range
of 10 – 66 GHz. The 802.16 standard includes the media access control (MAC) and
the physical (PHY) layers. WiMax has been designed basically to complement the
existing WiFi and Bluetooth technologies.
The
protocol structure of IEEE 802.16 – Broadband wireless MAN standard is shown
below:
Source:
www.javvin.com
The
above picture shows four layers – Convergence, MAC, Transmission and Physical.
These layers map to two of the lowest layers – physical and data link layers of
the OSI model. The ISO model is given below for your reference.
Source:
http://www.tutorial-reports.com/wireless/wlanwifi/
The
802.11 is based on a distributed architecture, whereas, WiMax is based on a
centrally controlled architecture. In this the scheduler residing in the Base
station (BS) has the complete control of the wireless media access. WiMax can
support multiple connections conforming to a set of QoS parameters and provides
the packet classifier ability to map the connections to many user applications
and interfaces. Read
more on this...
These
interfaces may range from Ethernet, TDM, ATM, IP, and VLAN etc. The flexibility
provided by WiMax also increases the complexity in service deployment and
provisioning of fixed and mobile broadband wireless access (BWA) networks.
It
would be better to explain the differences in the QoS mechanisms in the 802.11
and 802.16. This helps in finding out the challenges associated with
large-scale WiMax deployment.
WiFi
network is characterized by its simplicity. A Subscriber Station (SS) can very
easily travel through a hotspot or an Access Point (AP). This does not require
any user intervention. 802.11 is based on a distributed architecture. Here, MAC
is coordinated among AP s and SS’. On the other hand, WiMax is based on
centralized control architecture. Here, the scheduler in the BS has complete
control of the wireless media access among all SS’. WiMax can support multiple
connections having complete QoS readiness.
WiMax
provides many user application and interfaces like Ethernet, TDM, ATM, IP, and
VLAN.
WiMax
offers a rich feature set and flexibility, which also increases the complexity
of service deployment and provisioning for fixed and mobile networks. Let us
take a look at the WiMax Management Information Base (MIB).
WiMax
Management Information Base
Source:
http://www.intel.com
The
above figure shows the management reference model for BWA networks. This
consists of a Network Management System (NMS), some nodes, and a database. BS
and SS managed nodes collect and store the managed objects in an 802.16 MIB
format. Managed objects are made available to NMS’ using the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP).
The
database shows the service flow and its associated QoS information. The
information is then directs the BS and SS to create transport connections.
WiMax
– How It Works
It is imperative that customer intervention
and truck roll is minimized so that WiMax can be deployed properly. When a
customer subscribes to the WiMax service, the service provider asks the
customer for the service flow information. This would include number of UL / DL
connections with the data rates and QoS parameters. The customer also needs to
tell the kind of applications that he proposes to run.
The
service provider then proceeds to pre-provision the services and enters the
information in the Service Flow Database.
WiMax
– Competing Technologies
As
we learnt in the previous pages, that WiMax was formed to complement Bluetooth
and WiFi technologies, let us look at the differences in each of these:
Table
I – Difference between WiMax, WLAN and Bluetooth
Parameters |
WiMax |
WLAN |
Bluetooth |
Frequency |
2
– 11 GHz |
2.4
GHz |
Varies |
Range
|
~31
miles |
~100
metres |
~10
metres |
Data
Transfer Rate |
70mbps |
11
– 55mbps |
20
– 55mbps |
Users |
1000s |
>
10 |
>
10 |
Source:
www.javvin.com
WiMax
Implementation Challenges
The
802.16 MAC
protocol performs mainly two tasks – Periodic and Aperiodic activities.
Fast activities (periodic) like scheduling, packing, fragmentation and ARQ are
hard-pressed for time and have hard deadlines. They must be performed within a
single frame.
The
slow activities, on the other hand, typically execute as per pre-fixed timers,
but are not associated with any timers. They also do not have specific time
frame or deadline.
Subscriber
station and Base station and their association occur through an exchange of
messages and create many connections. There is an associated state between the
SS and the BS. These connections sometime include the state to be tracked in
the fast category. The connections may include fragmentation status, ARQ
retransmissions and packing. The QoS and MAC challenges described above are not
the only ones faced by WiMax. There are some virtualization challenges faced by
the 802.16 MAC implementers.
Conclusion
WiMax
may very well be the happening technology of the future, but the community is
keeping its fingers crossed!