We begin bombing in 4 minutes... [queue Reagan sound clip]

Actually I was thinking it would be cool to get 20 people to just mow down pedestrians in right wing electoral regions. Sure would open up a debate, and you would have the majority view: we do not agree with increasing road deaths, but decreasing right wing voters seems like a legitamite goal. Good at fueling the debate for the loss of say 100 lives tops [has to be a big enough number on the same day to be statistically significant].

No bombs required just people and motors. 9/11 with cars. I am sooo clever.

What I was really thinking was writing up a 9/11 HowTo so that I might get arrested just to show someone is interested in me. Very unibomer ish. Insecureish. Jesus Christ like, Ghandi like. Basically how to waste the spooks time (or is it a waste? [double bluff, tripple, conspiracy theorists are too deep - occams razor etc.]).

Wasting spooks time so they will realise there is no military or technological solution: faq well not really questions directives, an antidote, or follow on from: how to keep your privacy on site:www.eff.org this is how to leak your information so spooks might just have to read it, a false positive. Or maybe not so false. Hide the 'terrorists'/freedom fighter, encourage dialogue, I ramble.... and everyone knows this stuff already

From: @hotmail.com
Subject: Wasting Government Time
Date: 2001-07-31 03:07:54 PST

What is the best way to waste the time of government bodies who
monitor
email and/or telephone conversations? (Please point me to an faq..)

just a few thought to be added to:
1/encrypt with an easy to decypt password (I am not important enough
for
them to try very hard :) )
2/send lots of slightly altered binaries/gifs back and forth with your
normal mail
3/browse the hacking/conspiracy/revolutionary web sites
4/use hushmail.com and/or PGP
5/talk about unibomber type conspiracies on the phone
6/use emacs spook command
7/mention project echelon  and Operation Vengefull
8/try not to get too wrapped up in this stuff yourself as they are
probably not watching you (much).
9/Send around this type of newsgroup posting..
10/Make conversations over insecure channels based on previous secure
channel eg face to face conversations that would not have been likely
to be taped
11/Base insecure communication conversations on shared belief systems
and/or shared knowledge (for example literary references) that would
take some effort for the eavesdropper to  resolve.
12/Make insecure communications ambiguous so that the other side of
the conversation may work out the really meaning (or demand
clarification), the eavesdropper cannot resolve ambiguity by cross
examining..

I thought encrypting everything too much might make it too hard for
them to track you and not fire off enough warning signals in their
(automated) monitoring center..

So basically I want to put a message [the president will be shot
within the next month] inside a lightly encrypted message so when they
decrypt it [maybe automatically] they think they have some information of
value, or that they have to act upon, if they act you know they have
read your message. Alternatively put in a really good original joke
(they are hard to come by [whats brown and sticky? -- a stick]
[standards of humour may vary]) and see if it gets back to you through
the government listener. These are the two standard cryptography 'red
book' methods of seeing if your communication channel is compromised.

I am not a good shot so I'll have to get someone else to do it.
[insert smiley if/as appropriate] [I've heard the U.S. secret service follow
up every threat to the presidents life but then I did not say which
president :), just like them to assume it was a reference to the U.S.
President ]

Turloch

'There is a place for everyone in this struggle no matter how big or
how small. Let us increase our strength and the strength of our analysis
by finding a place for  them all.'

PGP key follows
--
YeP I HaVe NOT BoTHereD To GEt PGp -- yet

Anyway additions to the faq send email to totieNOSPAMrne at

hotmail.com spelling corrections even, that would show someone is reading!