[- Home -]-[- MOVIE REVIEWS -]-[- Staff Profiles -]-[- Guestbook -]-[- Message Board -]-[- Editorials -]
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Feed
(2005)

Reviewed By Ragnarok

Genre: Internet Predator With A Fat Fetish
Director: Brett "The Lawnmower Man" Leonard
Writer: Kieran "Bad-Ass Mono Wing Angel" Galvin
Featuring: Alex "Man-Thing" O'Loughlin
Patrick "Man-Thing" Thompson
Gabby "Muriel's Wedding" Millgate

Review______________
I was at Casey’s the other day buying a pizza, and guess who I ran into? Jeff Goldbloom’s mom. Man, that’s an old joke. The fat jokes are funny, but they hurt. The fat movies doubly so. I’m afraid I have the usually-reliable Fangoria to blame for today’s corpulent travesty. To be fair, it was more or less as disgusting as they promised it would be, but unless the only thing you ask from your movies is a chance to exercise your gag reflex suppression, there’s not much to recommend.

Philip is a tough Australian Interpol agent who doesn’t play by the rules (just once I‘d like to see a cop movie where the hero is a totally by-the-book poindexter). His last case, involving the Wustenfeld Maneater (go buy a Macabre CD RIGHT NOW!), got him into some hot water with the boss. When he and his partner Nigel discover a porn fetish website dedicated to blubberiffic women who seem to be disappearing, he wants to head to the states to discover who’s behind it. Bossman says no, but he leaves anyway, and discovers the heavy-duty perversions of a crazy named Michael. He kidnaps women, feeds them until they can’t move, and then posts their vital signs on his website so people can bet on when they’ll die from Hardee’s™ overdose. His latest meat bag, Dierdre, is firmly convinced that they’re in love, and their relationship goes deeper than him making a quick buck on her death. When Philip arrives to save the day, she’s not exactly thrilled. He and Michael square off in Michael’s den of fatal tubbiness in a calorie-packed duel to the death.

Remember when I said the fat jokes were funny, but they hurt? After re-reading that last paragraph, I’m not even sure they’re funny. I think they just hurt. Kinda like this movie. It’s just one more in a long line of good ideas ruined by shitty directors. I probably should have known when the DVD case proudly proclaimed “From the director of Lawnmower Man”. If a crappy 12-year-old TV movie that hardly anyone remembers is the best thing you can think of to promote your new project, it’s time to re-evaluate your career.

Michael is an interesting enough character, and well-played, but he’s the only one in the movie that you almost never want to impale with a fucking ice auger. His logic for what he does is completely wrong, but he’s insane, so what do you expect. The only time I really really hated him was when he had Philip completely at his disposal, then put his gun down out of his reach and turned his attention to Dierdre, allowing Phil to get the jump on him. For what I sincerely wish but really doubt will be the last goddamn time I have to say this, don’t make your characters behave unrealistically stupid to advance your crappy plot! Seriously, that should be the first thing they teach in any writing class.

And speaking of Philip, let’s talk about him for a bit, shall we? Remember the Shadow Fury review where I talked about the formula for stupid, abusive jackass cop heroes that everyone seems to find so compelling? Well, apparently no one involved in this movie read that review. Philip is even more loathsome, abusively fucking his unbelievably obnoxious girlfriend until she leaves him. And don’t you have to go through some kind of physical training to become an Interpol agent? Seriously, he lets the willowy crazy guy get the drop on him and beat the shit out of him at least three different times before a needlessly stupid “whoops, we wrote ourselves into a corner” moment finally allows him to regain control of the situation. Honestly, when did everyone start subscribing to the Ayn Rand school of character development? And more importantly, when the hell are they going to stop?

I will give the movie some credit for a couple of sequences that made even me feel a little urpy, involving a funnel, some weight-gain powder, and several jugs of melted-down human fat. Michael’s ickiness is pretty damn icky.

And then there’s the ending. Oh, Jesus H. jumped-up Zombie Christ, the fucking ending. I’m gonna go ahead and spoil it for you, because it’s so goddamn stupid, that when it comes, you’re going to want to boot your TV into the street anyway. Philip, after shooting Dierdre in the head (because she’s fucking annoying) and kneecapping Michael (because he’s fucking crazy), marries Michael’s sister and keeps Michael bound to a wheelchair in his own lair so he can go there every day after work and starve him to death, taunting him by eating sandwiches and making Michael watch. How he found work, got a visa, married Michael’s sister, and bought a house all apparently within about 24 hours after the climax is anyone’s guess. And that’s it. He just gets away with it, all nice and clean. Interpol doesn’t notice that one of its agents disappeared on an unauthorized case and just wound up staying in America? The DVD case hails Feed as a cross between Supersize Me and Silence of the Lambs. I’d describe it as a cross between Supersize Me and Seven starring Mitchell with the ending of Manos: Hands of Fate. Except all four of those movies are much better than this one.

Actually, there’s an alternate ending in the special features where Philip’s boss arrives with a sniper and kills Phil to keep his actions quiet and retain the integrity of Interpol. And why they didn’t use this ending, which actually makes the movie make some fucking sense, I have no idea. Like I said, good idea ruined by a shitty directing job.

Judging from a couple other things I’ve read about the movie, it’s supposed to be one of those soul-searching morally ambiguous tales where you’re not sure who you’re supposed to root for, because the theoretical “good guy” is just as much of an ass as the villain. This type of thing is tricky to pull off, because if you’re not careful all you have is a movie full of repulsive dickweeds who no one in the audience can relate to and therefore no one gives a shit what’s going on and just wants the movie to fucking end so they can throw in a "Gilmore Girls" DVD instead. Stop looking at me like that.

In fact, I’d like to call a stop to this kind of story right now. It’s not that it’s a bad device. It’s not that there have never been any good stories like this. In fact, it’s because there’s already been one story of that kind done so well that any other will pale in comparison, so you might as well just quit while you’re ahead. I’m talking, of course, about Devil’s Rejects - one of, if not the best movie to be released in the last 20 years or so. Maybe even ever. I never ask that a movie reinvents the wheel. I’m perfectly happy with just a really fuckin’ good wheel. But since I already have the greatest wheel ever filmed sitting on my DVD shelf, I really don’t need any more wheels of this particular nature.

Next time you’re out looking for some wheels, roll on past this one. It’s lumpy and rusty, the inner tube is flat, the tire is bald, and it won’t fit on your car.

Moral of the Story: Seriously, Ayn Rand fucking sucks. She’s the female equivalent of Ernest Hemingway. Only pretentious douche bags who want to sound intellectual and important read Ayn Rand, completely missing the fact that she’s one of the worst writers the human race has, and is likely ever to, produce. I’d rather be force to chew my own testicles off at gunpoint rather than read a single paragraph of any given one of her shitty novels. I’d rather shove my head into an elephant’s ass and eat all the shit therein while being disemboweled and repeatedly bitten on the penis by rattlesnakes than even clap eyes on something the pages of which have been made from recycled paper that once had something Ayn Rand wrote printed on it. I’d rather…well, you get the idea. This could go on all night. Drive safe. Sleep well. Don’t read Ayn Rand.

FEEDBACK

Your Name:
Your Website:
 
What do you think about the guy responsible for this review?
Like Him Hate Him
What did you think about this review?
It sucked sweaty boiled eggs.
No better or worse than I'd expect from a movie review.
Very entertaining (i.e. it kicked generous helpings of the proverbial ass!) and I'd like to find out more about this topic at my local library, because "Knowledge is power"!
 
Got an opinion that this review or the movie therein has riled in the very core of your being? Do you ache and scream to be heard on this matter? Do you have an opinion and, Gods damn it, you feel it needs to be heard?! Fill this shit out and send away my friend and we'll do what we can to help you relieve your soul... just not on the carpet.

All materials found within this review are the intellectual properties and opinions of the original writer. The Tomb of Anubis claims no responsibility for the views expressed in this review, but we do lay a copyright claim on it beeyotch, so don't steal from this shit or we'll have to go all Farmer Vincent on your silly asses. © March 5th 2006 and beyond, not to be reproduced in any way without the express written consent of the reviewer and the Tomb of Anubis or pain of a physical and legal nature will follow. Touch not lest ye be touched.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

[- Home -]-[- MOVIE REVIEWS -]-[- Staff Profiles -]-[- Guestbook -]-[- Message Board -]-[- Editorials -]