THE ROTATION
OF MAGNETIC FIELD
The question I asked and searched for an
answer is: Does the Earth's magnetic field rotate with the planet?
Many of you will say, of course it does. But beware, before you make quick conclusions. Some findings and facts explained on this site may be new to you. So come along with me in finding an answer to this simple question.
In 1832 famous scientist Michael Faraday performed some very
interesting experiments with magnets and conducting disks. Since then in most
schools teachers speak of these important experiments, which started the modern
era of electricity, communication and Internet. Without Faraday's discovery of
electromagnetic induction, none of this would be here now.
But! It took me years before I realised, that teachers in school did
tell me but just a fragment of truth about this experiments. Why?
There is one experiment that Michael performed that puzzled him and
everyone in scientific community since then. It is even today called Faraday's
paradox. And teachers do avoid this subject, if they know about it, for it is
rather puzzling to explain.
What am I talking about?
Let us repeat those Faraday's experiments. Since seeing is believing I
suggest you do the experiments yourself. It is very easy. And takes just simple
materials and instruments as permanent magnet, metallic disk, and voltmeter,
drilling machine. A nylon string, glue, stick, and some adhesive tape.
Let us do the experiments.
We are all very familiar with the fact that a voltage is induced in
conductor moving in magnetic field.
There are three experiments need to be done at first step.
These three experiments performed by Michael Faraday were puzzling.
Why?
There are two possible explanations of the phenomena. We know that if we have a
relative motion between the conductor and magnetic field, voltage is induced in
conductor. But these three experiments suggest something different. So we have
two possible explanations. Keep in mind that we have actually three elements in
these experiments. And we have to take in consideration relative motion between
all three elements. Yet we have three experiments with three observed facts. So
a definitive conclusion cannot be made.
First possible explanation is that in exp1 voltage is induced in disk,
while we do not have relative motion between voltmeter and magnet. In exp2
voltage is not induced in disk and voltmeter. Yet both voltages are of same
sign so the voltage difference cannot be measured. And in exp3 voltage is
induced in voltmeter, because it has relative motion to magnet, while disk does
not.
And there is also another possible explanation. The magnetic field
cannot be rotated around its magnetical axis. We can rotate the magnet as much
as we want, yet all we do rotate is the magnet not its magnetic field. In fact
we must conclude that magnet does create or bear magnetic field. But we must
also state that magnetic field and magnet are not one and the same reality.
Like the colour of the ball. One red ball has it's own colour. And colour is a
property of the ball. Yet if you rotate the ball, do you rotate the colour? Can
you rotate or move the property of the object with the object? Everyone in
right mind knows that the question does not make sense and cannot be answered.
But this did not satisfy me. I needed answer to this puzzle. And it was
horrible revelation to me that some prominent 'scientist' tried to answer the
question by repeating and repeating the same three experiments in well equipped
laboratories, tried to measure some difference. It should be simple known to
anyone that we have a riddle of three elements and three results. It cannot be
solved like that. Even more saddening is the fact that this very same people
used very complicated mathematical formulas to support one or the other answer.
Yet it looks to me that they know how to calculate, they lack simple logic.
Like in all good things in life simple questions require simple
solutions. I wasted a lot of time myself thinking of this Faraday's riddle. But
after some time a solution to the question was formed in my mind.
The key question here is the relativity of conductor and magnetic
field. So we have to dispense one element to gain conclusive decision. In our
case this has to be measuring instrument, voltmeter. But by such constitution
we have no longer ability to detect the presence of induced voltage. Or..?
Here I used the reality. We can never have a perfect disk with perfect
roundness or a perfectly uniform magnetic field. And we can never put disk and
magnetic filed perfectly in line of the same axis. This fact can be used in our
new experiment. Let us do two more experiments.
By this simple experiment I solved Faraday's riddle in December 2002.
The magnetic field CANNOT BE ROTATED ON ITS POLAR AXIS.
I know many experiments were done on Faraday's paradox. Some even
solved the problem. But none of these experiments were simple to perform and
were not so conclusive as mine. And I do not know of anyone who did the same
experiment as I did.
Now let us come to the basic question.
Does the Earth's magnetic field rotate
with the planet?
If the magnetic field of simple permanent magnet is not rotated with
the magnet? What about Earth's magnetic field. I mailed my discovery to some
experts in the field of geomagnetism a month after my solution to Faraday's
paradox. Most of them didn't reply. Some of them were not even aware of the
existence of Faraday's paradox. I told you before, that teachers avoid the
subject for lack of explanation. The rest concluded that Earth's magnetic field
rotates with the planet in spite of fact that magnetic field of a simple magnet
can not be rotated.
I will avoid repeating reasons they offered for their belief. Let us
just say I never ever in my life heard of so stupid and ingenious claims.
One, best of them, to my opinion, was that Earth’s magnetic field is
much more complex than magnetic field of bar magnet.
Is it?
I do not think that complexity of this planets magnetic field is
simple. But as we all know even the smallest bar magnet has a magnetic filed
that is just the result of many many small magnets constituting the bigger one.
So even the smallest magnet is composed. One can find this simply by breaking
the magnet. If you break the magnet you do not have separate poles. You have
two magnets.
Obviously magnet is composed of many smaller magnets.
It should be noted here, that none of physics I know ever used simple
but effective logic of Lucretius, by which he explained the existence of atoms.
For if you can divide something, you must have the one that divides and the one
between. This is just my hint to all people who still search for aether. J
Think. For our mind and logic is the best laboratory ever constructed.
You do not need complex machinery to explore the nature and it's laws. All you
need is clear mind, logic and a bit of fantasy. So if you can divide a magnet
and the result is two magnets and two magnetic fields, you can question
yourself, did you divide one magnetic field in two? And if so, what is that,
that Lucretius would call »the one between«?
Fact is. This planet's magnetic field does not rotate with the planet. For
even if it would be the most complex magnetic field in universe, it would still
be obedient to the laws of nature. And the law of nature is that magnetic
field cannot be rotated on it's own polar axis. Sic! Simple or complex. It
does not rotate.
And if we accept this simple fact, we should know by now from all these
simple experiments, that we do rotate in Earth's magnetic field, and some
induced voltage must be present by that.
For all those scientist, who searched for reasons of telluric currents
and explanations of geodynamo process that is creating Earth's magnetic field,
please take this fact in consideration. It is of utmost importance. Feel free
to forget all theories and hypothesis you know. Just perform these five simple
experiments and conclude by your own mind and reason.
To me conclusive experiment is more than any even so beautiful theory.
Facts are facts.
We do leave in sea of energy. Free energy. For if we would be able to
construct a simple coil in which only one half would be sensitive to induction
and other half noninductive, we could gain almost limitless quantities of
electrical energy just from fact that we rotate and move in Earth's magnetic
field.
Please do not confuse the rotation of magnetic poles around rotational
axis of Earth. Earth's magnetic poles relation to any point on the globe does
not change with the rotation of the planet. Position of poles rotate of course.
But the magnetic field does not.
With these I conclude my first paper in the series of exploration. Feel
free to e-mail me and comment these lines. But if in any doubt. Please do
perform these experiment's yourself before you jump to conclusions and attack
me for heresy.
Vanja Janežič
Slovenia
Email: Vanja.Janezic@cgp.si