Special Education Services for Students in

 

the School Library Media Center

 

Susan L. Peyton

 

Southern Connecticut State University

 

Abstract

A review of the literature regarding special education students’ use of the library media center suggests that the media center should be viewed as an extension of the classroom in which students’ access to information is enhanced, particularly in middle and high school.  This study addresses the services provided to special education students in middle and high school library media centers in Connecticut.  One hundred twenty six media specialists volunteered to complete a survey, either online or in writing, on the services their media center provides for special education students.  Specifically, (1) the accommodations that are currently available for special needs students; (2) the extent to which library media specialists are receiving training in this area; and (3) the amount of collaboration between media specialists and special education teachers are explored.  Although the majority of media centers surveyed are both physically accessible and provide basic services for students with disabilities, the level of accommodation provided is fairly low, the amount of training available to media specialists is limited, and not a great deal of provision is made for collaboration with special education teachers.  The education of students with disabilities in Connecticut could be enhanced by providing a higher level of accommodation within their library media centers.

 

Introduction

Much research has been conducted on the impact of school library media centers on academic achievement, particularly standardized test scores (e.g Loertscher, 1993; Manzo, 2000; Todd, 2003). The impact of media centers on special education students, however, has not been the focus of as much attention, although the research does demonstrate that special education students benefit from a strong school library media center. A key study, conducted over a 4 year span in Australia, concluded that school libraries play an important role in both the social and academic development of students with disabilities (Murray, 2000a).

A search of the Educator’s Reference Complete and Ebsco databases revealed limited research on services for special education students in the library media center in the United States.  However, the movement of special education students from self contained educational settings to more inclusive ones has garnered attention, and has an impact on school library media centers (Hopkins, 2005; Murray, 2002).  Inclusion of students with disabilities within the general education setting has become an important concept in special education. It generally entails these students being in the same classroom as students without disabilities throughout the school day, rather than in a separate classroom. Research has found that the media center plays a greater role in the education of students in an inclusive arrangement, easing some of the difficulties these students encounter in the regular classroom (Hopkins, 2005). As inclusion becomes the norm for special education students, more attention must be paid to the services provided by their library media centers.

Although students at all grade levels benefit from the library media center, it becomes particularly important for special education students at the middle and high school levels. Prior to this time, students primarily receive all of their academic instruction in one classroom; therefore, additional resources are likely to be provided to them in that setting. (Hopkins, 2005). However, once students begin changing classes throughout the day, the likelihood of there being additional support in each of their classrooms becomes smaller; the resources are simply not available (Selverstone, 2003). At the middle and high school level, students often have to go to the special education resource room in order to access the assistance they require, but many are reluctant to do so as they prefer to remain with their peers. Providing these services in the media center alleviates this problem (Hopkins, 2005).  The key questions become 1) what services and materials will benefit students with disabilities in middle and high school library media centers; 2) are they currently available there; and 3) are students benefiting from them.

Much of what can be provided for students in the media center is referred to as “assistive technology.” The federal government includes in its definition of assistive technology “any device that helps a person with a disability function in a given environment.” (State of CT, n.d.).  This definition is purposely very broad, and can include a variety of items ranging from low to very high tech. It is unclear what, if any, assistive technology is currently being provided in middle and high school library media centers in the United States, and whether media specialists have the knowledge to assist students in using what is available.

The library media specialist’s knowledge of both students and resources plays a large role in offering services for special education students. He or she often has contact with these students year after year, as opposed to teachers who only have them for one year or one semester. This contact allows the media specialist to learn about student strengths and weaknesses, as well as their areas of interest. In addition, the media specialist has first hand knowledge of what the media center has to offer, and how it can be utilized by students with disabilities (Downing, 2006). This person should be viewed as a resource for all students in the school community.

It is the role of the media specialist to assist students in learning about and using the resources available in the library media center. (Hopkins, 2004). His or her knowledge of the assistive technology available is a key element in the provision of services. Through both education and experience, the library media specialist is able to develop an understanding of what resources are appropriate for which students (Downing, 2006). For example, much of the software commonly used in schools and libraries, such as Microsoft XP, has features that can be utilized by students with disabilities, such as voice recognition and magnification (Downing, 2006; Neal, 2006). However, if no one knows that these features exist, and how to use them, they cannot benefit students. 

One of the many roles of the media specialist is to acquire appropriate materials for students with disabilities. These include, but are not limited to, items such as large print books, audio books, captioned videos, and books that are high interest but low reading level (Murray, 2000b; Hopkins, 2004). These resources are not particularly expensive, and although they are generally purchased with special education students in mind, they can be used by the whole student body. Of concern in the Australia study mentioned earlier was the finding that several schools with disabled students enrolled had none of these materials available in the library media center (Murray, 2002)

In addition to providing materials in alternative formats, school library media centers are able to provide specific assistive technology for special education students. Some of the devices available include headphones, screen reading software, magnification devices, adaptive keyboards, scanners, and cassette recorders (Hopkins, 2003; Peters, 2006; Neal, 2006; Hopkins, 2006) Even though all of these options may not be needed at the present time, library media specialists should be aware of their existence, and be able to obtain them when necessary. They should also stay informed about the diverse needs of the students in their school, as they are in a position where they can assist all students through the resources they make available (Neal, 2006).

Although the school library media center can play a key role in providing assistive technology for the special education students in the school, this does not always occur. In researching this topic, Hopkins (2004) found a lack of assistive technology devices in K-12 schools. This is in part due to monetary issues: many schools do not have the funding to pay for either the technology itself or for staff training (Selverstone, 2003). In order for the media center to truly support all students, it must receive adequate financial support from administration.

However, when it comes to providing service, there are many other barriers that can not be solved simply by increasing funding; they require physically redesigning the library. These include issues such as doorways that are not wide enough for wheelchair access; shelves that are too close together; and shelving that is too high for a physically handicapped student to reach. As Downing (2006) pointed out, “(o)ften, the first barriers encountered by students with disabilities attempting to use the library are physical ones.” In addition, furniture needs to be suitable for use with a wheelchair, which is another large expense if it does not already exist.

There are ways of providing assistance to special education that do not entail large expenditures of money. Simple steps such as having basic supplies available (Neal, 2006); color coding (Hopkins, 2004); and posting rules and routines (Downing, 2006) can make a big difference for students with disabilities. Simply finding out what other school departments have available for student use in the library is a cost-free way to obtain resources (Hopkins, 2003). Finally, ensuring that special education students plenty of time in the library media center can be a key component of providing services that does not increase the budget (Downing, 2006).

The majority of literature available points to one additional key element to providing services for all students: the importance of collaborating with the special education teachers in the school (e.g. Downing, 2006; Hopkins, 2003, Jurkowski, 2006). The Australia study found that, although the most successful library media programs for students with disabilities occurred in situations in which the media specialist and the special education teachers worked closely, this does happen in all schools (Murray, 2000b; Murray, 2000c) Media specialists need to be made aware of the variety of disabilities that students in their school possess, and how to best provide for their needs. This can only occur through contact with the special education staff. In addition, Hopkins (2003) pointed out that special education teachers can make the media specialist aware of which students are not using the media center and why, so that the media specialist can deal with these issues.

Collaboration between the regular education teachers and the media specialist is also important. The Ontario Ministry of Education deems it important enough to include as a directive that media specialists are to “partner with teachers to develop strategies and accommodations for our exceptional students” (Jouzaitis, 2004). As the “information expert” of the school, as well as one of the people most familiar with the assistive technology available, the media specialist needs to work with all teachers in order to allow their expertise to impact all of the students. In addition, as schools focus more on information literacy and promoting learning as a lifelong process, it becomes even more important for the media specialist to work with the entire school community (Jurkowski, 2006). As mentioned earlier, the media specialist has the opportunity to know the strengths and weaknesses of all students in the school, and can provide assistance in all subject areas.

It is apparent that the school library media specialist can work with both special education and regular education teachers to improve the education of students with disabilities. However, it is up to the media specialist to advocate for his or her program. The media specialist needs to make teachers aware of the resources available in the media center, as well as the value of collaboration (Jouzaitis, 2004). This can be done in a variety of ways, but the most important factor is letting the teaching staff know that the media specialist is willing to work with them. Collaborating with the media specialist can take some of the burden off of regular education teachers who must provide for both regular education and special education students in their classroom (Hopkins, 2005).

To effectively collaborate with teachers on educating special education students, it is imperative that media specialists truly understand the needs of the students. There should be open communication with special education staff to determine what materials and instruction are appropriate for specific students (Jouzaitis, 2004). The media specialist should also have access to student Individualized Education Plans, so they are aware of what services must be provided (Jouzaitis, 2004). In addition to communication, more formal training is also important. Murray (2000c) found that, as little information on disabilities is provided for media specialists during their formal education, they require training on issues such as inclusion and legislation. If this training is not made available through their school district, the media specialist can use their professional development time to visit schools with unfamiliar technology, attend relevant conferences, and meet with suppliers of assistive technology to learn more about their products (Hopkins, 2003).

The importance of the media center and its staff being properly equipped to assist students with special needs is apparent. However, in order to benefit from the services available, students must actually go to the media center. It must provide a welcoming environment where students feel comfortable spending time (Murray, 2000b). It should be viewed by students as a safe, quiet location where they can get away from the active pace of the rest of the school (Jurkowski, 2006). In addition students must be able to access the services they need. They can be assisted in this process in many ways. Some students visit the library with a special education aide, while others feel it is the one place in the school that they do not need an aide because the media center staff can help them when needed (Murray, 2000a). Students can also be provided with “peer buddies”; regular education students who have received training and can help them with things such as locating resources and getting books off of high shelves (Jones, 2000; Murray, 2000a).

The library media center and the services provided there can have a positive impact on the education of students with disabilities. The assistive technology available improves their opportunities for learning, both now and throughout their lives, which is important for increasing their independence (Hopkins, 2003; Hopkins, 2004). Through collaboration with other teachers, the media specialist can increase students’ educational experiences as well as relieve some of the burden on the teachers (Downing, 2006). School media centers can also go beyond education and information provision by allowing special education students to develop vocational skills through working in the media center, where they can feel productive while learning skills that can be used in an employment situation (Murray, 2000a; Jurkowski, 2006).

However, it is unclear whether media centers in the United States have the resources necessary to adequately serve all of the students in their school community. Technology has been touted as “level(ing) the playing field” (Selverstone, 2003), but if it is not readily available, it is of no benefit. In addition, the extent to which media specialists receive both training and support to provide for special education students and collaborate with their fellow teachers is also unknown. Further research in this area is needed to determine whether special education students are receiving all of the benefits possible from the library media center.

This study focuses on middle school and high school media centers throughout the state of Connecticut.  Media specialists were surveyed to determine the services provided for special education students, including physical accommodations and assistive technology.  In addition, information regarding professional education for media specialists on this topic as well as provisions for collaboration with special education teachers was requested, to determine if these are occurring. 

 

Method

Subjects

            The subjects for this study were library media specialists from middle and high schools in the state of Connecticut.              A total of 126 survey responses were received, which is a response rate of 49.6%.  Of the responses, 42% were from middle schools and 56% from high schools.  The remaining 2% of responses were from schools that serve students in grades 7 through 12.  

Instrument

A survey was constructed to gather information about resources available to special education students in the library media center and any training that library media specialists receive on this topic (see Appendix C).  Included in the survey were questions on collaboration with special education teachers and access to Individualized Education Plans by the media specialist.  An online version of the survey was created using Survey Monkey.

Procedure

            The State of Connecticut webpage “Connecticut Schools on the Web” (http://www.dir.ct.gov/kids/Schools_Libraries/ctschools.asp) was searched for middle school and high school contact information.  The website of each school was visited to obtain contact information for the school library media specialist(s) at that school.  If an email address was available for a school, it was used for survey distribution.  If there was no email address found on the site, a hard copy of the survey was mailed, using the name of the media specialist(s), if available.  If no name was found, they the envelope was addressed to the “School Library Media Specialist” at each of the schools.

            A total of 254 schools were surveyed; 104 were sent hard copies of the survey along with a postage-paid return envelope, and the other 150 were emailed a link to an online version of the survey using Survey Monkey.  Many of the schools had more than one media specialist.  For schools receiving a hard copy, only one copy was sent to the school with all names listed on the envelope.  For schools with multiple media specialist email addresses, all were contacted, resulting in 170 emails being sent.  However, in the cover letter the media specialists were instructed that if there were more than one media specialist at the school that only one survey should be completed.

            Fifteen out of the total of 170 emails sent were returned as “undeliverable,” either due to a spam blocker or to the address being incorrect.

 

Results

 

            Overall, library media centers in the state of Connecticut are providing the basic necessities for special needs students; they are handicapped accessible and offer some materials that are appropriate for students with disabilities.  However, there are areas that are in need of improvement in order to fully meet the needs of all students.  In addition, there is a need for more collaboration with special education teachers and more training for media specialists on meeting the needs of special education students.

Structural Accommodations

            In the area of structural accommodations, the majority of media centers surveyed are physically accessible for all students, with enough room between shelves for wheelchair access (78%), wide doorways (84%), and furniture that is handicapped accessible (71%).  In addition, 63 percent of media centers report having appropriate lighting, which is important for students with visual impairments.  The greatest physical limitation is that, in 46 percent of the media centers surveyed, there are shelves that a student in a wheelchair would be unable to reach.   This is most apparent in the high schools, in which only 38 percent report having their entire shelving wheelchair accessible. It appears that this issue is dealt with by having staff available to assist these students when needed, which occurs in 81 percent of the media centers. 

                     Materials Available       

            The library media centers surveyed are providing some basic resources for special education students.  A great majority (92%) report having materials that are high interest/low reading level and many also provide audio books for students use (72%).  The majority of schools (76%) also provide books that present disabilities in a sensitive and meaningful way.  A variety of other materials are provided to a lesser degrees, including videos with captioning, large print books, and books for ESL students in their primary language.  In addition, several media specialists commented that their media center provides items such as easy reader books, graphic novels, and highly abridged novels; all of which are used by special education students.

 

Technology

            The provision of technology devices and adaptations is fairly limited, as there are only two items that are provided in the majority of library media centers:  headphones (81%) and scanners (66%).  Although a wide variety of devices and adaptations were listed on the survey, only one other is present in more than 25 percent of schools, which is a card catalog that accommodates remediate reading materials.  A few media specialists commented that certain materials are brought to the media center from another location, such as the special education department; however, having these materials and services available within the media center is of benefit to all students.  Although several of the resources listed in the survey do not cost additional money, such as use of appropriate web browsers, they are not being utilized in a significant number of schools.

 

 

Training Available

            The media specialists were surveyed regarding whether they had received training on the needs of special education students within the past five years.  Ten people chose not to answer this question, several of whom commented that they had not been in their position long enough to be able to answer accurately.  Those who did answer were fairly evenly divided, with a slight majority (53%) having received no training in the area during the last five years.  Of those who did receive training, the vast majority (84%) report having received in-house training.  In addition, 42 percent report outside speakers being brought into their school; 16 percent report attending outside professional development, such as conferences; and 15 percent report attending area or regional presentations on this topic.  

Collaboration

            Collaboration between the library media specialist and the special education teachers in the building does not appear to be of high priority in many of the schools surveyed.  Many media specialists (73%) report that they meet with them on an as-needed basis.  Less than 2 percent have regular scheduled meeting times; 7 percent meet with them only at the start of the school year; and 22 percent report having no time to meet with the special education teachers at all.

Additional Information

            In addition to the above areas, the survey also included more general questions.  The majority of the media specialists surveyed report that they do not provide materials for the parents of special needs students (74%), nor do they provide structured ways in which special education students can interact with their non-disabled peers (64%).  The majority of media centers are able to borrow materials for these students from other libraries when needed (86%).  However, only 56 percent of media specialists report that they have access to student IEPs, which is important when planning programming for students with special needs.  A few media specialists commented that access to IEPs is not needed, as they work closely with teaching staff that are familiar with them.    

 

Discussion

            The results of this survey which was completed by middle and high school media specialists indicate that, although school library media centers in Connecticut are providing basic services for students with disabilities, there is room for improvement.   On the positive side, the majority of media centers are physically accessible for all students; however, many have shelves that cannot be reached by students with certain physical handicaps.  Having staff help students get books, while helpful, impedes the ability of these students to function independently.  All shelves within the media center should be able to be reached by a student in a wheelchair.

            The library media centers surveyed are also providing basic resources for special education students, such as high interest/low level reading materials, audio books, headphones, and scanners.  However, greater attention should be paid to this issue.  For example, including large print books in the collection for visually impaired students, which can also be used by the rest of the student population.  Some of the accommodations available do not cost any money, but are not being done in many of the schools.  For example, having students use the accessibility features that are built into common software, such as the voice recognition capabilities of Microsoft XP, or simply having students use internet search engines that help scaffold their learning.

            Of particular concern is the lack of training provided for media specialists on the needs of students with disabilities.  Less than half of the schools surveyed provided this type of training within the past 5 years in any format, and the vast majority was in-house training.  Although this can be beneficial, the training required by media specialists to enhance the provision of services in the media center often involves issues new to the school, and thus must be provided by outside presenters.  For example, as research in this area progresses, new developments in assistive technology frequently become available, and the media specialist must know how to use them or they do not benefit the students.  They should be provided with opportunities to learn about the new technology available for students with disabilities, including time to conduct their own research and visit other media centers. 

            An additional area of concern is the lack of collaboration that occurs with the special education teachers.  The majority of media specialists mention that they are able to meet on an “as needed” basis.  However, the best scenario is to have regularly scheduled collaboration times throughout the year, so that working together is ensured.  Very few media specialists report that this occurs.  Most concerning is that almost one quarter of the media specialists surveyed reported that they have no time to meet with the special education staff.  This has been shown to be best way to provide services for special education students in the media center, and requires only the time to do so, but it is not happening on a consistent basis.

            Making many of the changes necessary for the media center to adequately serve all students in the school requires administrative support.  Media specialists must be provided with the training needed to determine what is needed and how to use it effectively with students.  Collaboration with special education teachers needs be a priority, with time designated for this purpose on a regular basis, as media specialists must be aware of the needs of the student body.  Finally, the funding for needed assistive technology must be provided in order to ensure that all students received an appropriate education.

 

References

Downing, J.  (2006).  Media centers and special education: Introduction to the special

 issue.  [Electronic version].  Intervention in School & Clinic, 42(2), 67-78.   

Hopkins, J. (2003, March). Assistive technology for the school library. [Electronic

version].  Library Media Connection, 21(6), 46.

Hopkins, J.  (2004). School library accessibility:  The role of assistive technology. 

            [Electronic version].   Teacher Librarian, 31(3). 

Hopkins, J. (2005).  Extending inclusive learning:  Library and special education

 collaboration.  [Electronic version].  Library Media Connection, 23(6), 17-19.    

Hopkins, J.  (2006). Assistive technology:  10 things to know.  [Electronic version]. 

            Library Media Connections, 25(1), 12-14. 

Jones, P. (2000). Come on in! Ways to welcome special needs kids into your library.

            [Electronic version].   Book Report, 18(5), 10.

Jouzaitis, V.  (2004). Serving the needs of our students with LD in the school library.

 [Electronic version].   School Libraries in Canada, 23(3), 34-38. 

Jurkowski, O. L.  (2006). The library as a support system for students.  [Electronic

            version].  Intervention in School & Clinic, 42(2), 78-84. 

 Loertscher, D. V. (1993).  Objective: achievement - Solution: school libraries.

  [Electronic version].  School Library Journal, 39(5), 30-34.

Manzo, K. K. (2000). Study shows rise in test scores tied to school library resources.

            [Electronic version].   Education Week, 19(28), 27.  

Murray, J. (2000a). How School Librarians can contribute to the personal growth of

students with disabilities. [Electronic version].  Orana, 36(2), 5.

Murray, J.  (2000b).  School libraries and special education:  An evaluation.  [Electronic

            version].  The Australian Library Journal, 49(4), 357. 

Murray, J. (2000c). Training school library staff to cater for diversity. [Electronic

            version].  Education for Information, 18(4), 313.

Murray, J. (2002).  The implications of inclusive schooling for school libraries.

            [Electronic version].    International Journal of Disability, Development, and

Education, 49(3), 301-322. 

Neal, J. & Ehlert, D. (2006).  20 ways to add technology for students with disabilities to

the library or media center.  [Electronic version].  Intervention in School or

            Clinic, 22(2), 119-123. 

Peters, T., & Bell, L. (2006). Assistive devices and options for Libraries. [Electronic

 version].  Computers in Libraries, 26(9), 38-40.

Selverstone, H. (2003, June). Tech for kids with disabilities. [Electronic version].  School Library Journal, 49(6), 36.

State of Connecticut-ConneCTKids website. (2006).  Connecticut Schools on the Web. Retrieved February 1, 2008 from http://www.dir.ct.gov/kids/Schools_Libraries/ctschools.asp

State of Connecticut-Department of Education & Department of Mental Retardation. (n.d.).  Promoting school success for your child with a disability.   Retrieved March 2, 2008 from http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/PowerPointPresentations/DEPS/LRE.ppt

Todd, R. J. (2003).  Irrefutable evidence.  [Electronic version].  School Library Journal, 49(4), 52. 

 

 

Appendix A

 

Cover Letter for Survey Distribution by Mail

 

                                                                       

Dear School Library Media Specialist,

 

My name is Susan Peyton.  I am an MLS student at Southern Connecticut State University pursing my certification as a School Library Media Specialist.   As one of my graduate school requirements, I am conducting research on services provided for special education students in school library media centers.  I will be using the data I collect to analyze the provisions that are made for special education students in the library media center, as well as the level of support provided for this purpose.

           

            I am requesting that you take the time to complete the enclosed questionnaire.  Any and all information obtained from you will be confidential.  Your privacy will be protected at all times.  You will not be identified individually in any way as a result of your participation in this research.  The data collected, however, may be used as part of publications and papers related to services for special education students in school library media centers. 

 

Participation in this survey is completely voluntary.  There is no penalty for refusal to participate.  Returning this survey indicates your permission for me to use this data for research purposes. 

 

            This survey should take about 15 minutes to complete.   Please make sure to complete both sides of the page.  I have enclosed a self-addressed stamped envelope in which you can return the survey.  If there is more than one media specialist in your media center, please complete only one to avoid duplication of results. Please return this survey by March 7th, 2008.

 

            Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey.   Your participation is greatly appreciated, and is helping me to complete my Master’s degree in library science. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.

 

 

 

Dr. Mary E. Brown,                                         Susan Peyton, Graduate Student

Buley 416                                                         Dept. of Information & Library Science

Southern Connecticut State University   Southern Connecticut State University

501 Crescent Street                                          521 Hampton Road

New Haven, CT  06515                                   Pomfret Center, CT  06259

E-mail: brownm6@southernct.edu                    Email:  speyton1619@yahoo.com

Phone: (203) 392-5781                                    Phone:  (890) 974-2195                      

                                                           

 

           

                                                                       

Appendix B

 

Cover Letter for Online Survey Distribution

 

Dear School Library Media Specialist,

 

My name is Susan Peyton.  I am an MLS student at Southern Connecticut State University pursing my certification as a School Library Media Specialist.   As one of my graduate school requirements, I am conducting research on services provided for special education students in school library media centers.  I will be using the data I collect to analyze the provisions that are made for special education students in the library media center, as well as the level of support provided for this purpose.

           

            I am requesting that you take the time to complete a survey on this topic.  Any and all information obtained from you will be confidential.  Your privacy will be protected at all times.  You will not be identified individually in any way as a result of your participation in this research.  The data collected, however, may be used as part of publications and papers related to services for special education students in school library media centers. 

 

Participation in this survey is completely voluntary.  There is no penalty for refusal to participate.  Completing this survey indicates your permission for me to use this data for research purposes. 

 

            This survey should take about 15 minutes to complete, and is available online at        If there is more than one media specialist in your media center, please complete only one survey to avoid duplication of results. Please complete this survey by March 7th, 2008.

 

            Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey.   Your participation is greatly appreciated, and is helping me to complete my master’s degree in library science. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.

 

 

 

Dr. Mary E. Brown,                                         Susan Peyton, Graduate Student

Buley 416                                                         Dept. of Information & Library Science

Southern Connecticut State University   Southern Connecticut State University

501 Crescent Street                                          521 Hampton Road

New Haven, CT  06515                                   Pomfret Center, CT  06259

E-mail: brownm6@southernct.edu                    Email:  speyton1619@yahoo.com

Phone: (203) 392-5781                                    Phone:  (890) 974-2195

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix C

Survey

Services for Special Education Students

 In the Library Media Center

 

I.  General Information

 

Grade level of school

            ______Middle School/Junior High School

            ______High School

            ______Other (please specify grade levels :_____________)

 

What type of setting is your school located in?

            ______Urban

            ______Suburban

            ______Rural

 

How do special education students visit the library media center?

            (Please check all that apply)

            _____With their general education class

            _____With a small group of students

            _____Individually

            _____Other (please specify:_________________________________)

 

II.   Physical Accommodations

 

What structural accommodations does your library have for special education students?

            (Please check all that apply)

            ______Wide doorways

            ______Adequate room between shelves

            ______Shelves low enough for wheelchair access

            ______Appropriate lighting

            ______Separate section for materials for special education students

            _____­­_Other (Please specify:____________________________________)

 

What items are provided to assist special education students to use the media center?

            (Please check all that apply)

            _____ Large signs

_____Appropriate furniture (i.e. OPAC at wheelchair height)

_____Visual reminders of rules or routines

            _____­­Other (Please specify:____________________________________)

 

 

What materials does your library offer for students?

            (Please check all that apply)

            ______Large print books

            ______Audio books

            ______High interest/low reading level books

            ______Fiction that presents disabilities in a sensitive and meaningful way

            ______Books for ESL students in their first language

            ______Videos with captions

            _____­­_Other (Please specify:____________________________________)

 

What technology devices or adaptations are available in the library media center?

            (Please check all that apply)

            _____Magnification devices

            _____Headphones

            _____Scanners

            _____Portable keyboards (e.g. Alpha Smart)

            _____Speech output system for visually impaired students

            _____Specialized software (Please specify:____________________________)

            _____Bookmarked websites tailored to special education students or teachers

                        (e.g. Bookshare.org, which provides access to previously scanned books)

            _____Use of accessibility features of common software

            _____Use of web browsers which help scaffold information

            _____Card catalog that accommodates remediate reading materials

 (e.g. Accelerated Reader)

            _____Other (Please specify:____________________________________)

 

 

III.  Support Services

 

Within the past 5 years, have you been offered training regarding the needs of special education students?    

 

Yes               No

 

If yes, what type of training was offered to you?

            (Please check all that apply)

            ______In house training

            ______Outside presenters brought into your school

            ______Area/regional presentations

            ______Outside professional development (i.e. conferences)

            ______Other (please specify:______________________________________)

 

Are you provided time to meet with special education teachers in your building?

            (Please check all that apply)

            ______No, time is not available

            ______Yes, at the start of the school year

            ______Yes, there is regularly scheduled meeting times throughout the year

            ______Yes, I meet with them on an as-needed basis

 

 

IV.  Other Information

 

Does your media center provide information for parents of special education students? 

           

   Yes                  No               

 

Does your library provide structured ways for special education students to interact with

their non-disabled peers?

 

                        Yes                  No

 

Is support staff available to assist special education students in the media center?

 

                        Yes                  No

 

Are you able to borrow materials from the public library or other location for special

education students?

 

                        Yes                  No

 

Does your library policy reflect elements of inclusion?

 

                        Yes                  No                   Don’t know

 

 

Do you have access to student IEPs?

 

                        Yes                  No

 

V.  Comments

 

Please use this section to add additional information that you feel is applicable to this study, including additional information on any of the questions above.