Friends of Peter MacKay

Dear Canadians,

Welcome to the Friends of Peter MacKay website. It has been designed by former Preston Manning, Tom Long, Lewis Mackenzie, Brian Pallister and Jean Charest supporters from East to West to give Canadians more information on where he stands, the work he does and his representation in the House of Commons.

This web site is set up to promote and assist Peter become the next leader of the Progressive Party of Canada. Whether you're looking for information about his activities, whether you're searching for ways to join the party and assist Peter become leader, this easy-to-use site has the details.

We hope you enjoy your virtual visit here and find this website useful! If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to get in touch with us by
sending us an email

Sincerely,

Friends of Peter MacKay
Peter MacKay, P.C., M.P.

MacKay-Orchard Defeats Prentice-Brison

Fourth ballot needed for strong Peter-David coalition to blowout unholy Jim-Scott alliance in T.O.; Historic party "Deal with the Devil" just sour grapes says MacKay and Orchard organizers

New Tory leader MacKay calls for unity - TORONTO - Front-runner Peter MacKay has won the leadership of the Progressive Conservative Party. He won in a fourth ballot with 64 per cent of the votes, beating Calgary lawyer Jim Prentice, the last of three challengers. MacKay led on every ballot, and had been expected to win.


In his acceptance speech at the floor of the Metro Toronto Convention Centre, MacKay called for party unity and said the Tories are the only alternative to the governing Liberals. "When our party is divided, we lose," he said.

He won after being backed by Saskatchewan farmer David Orchard, who was eliminated from the final ballot after coming last in the third.

MacKay, a Nova Scotia MP, received 1,510 votes. Prentice received 836.

Scott Brison, also a MP from Nova Scotia, was knocked off the third ballot because he came last in the second.

MacKay's victory was controversial because many of the delegates feared that he agreed to reconsider Tory support for free trade as the price of Orchard's support.


But in his speech, MacKay said free trade "has been a big winner for our country," and the Conservatives "will study the ways to improve the deal."



Fourth-ballot leadership results


Peter MacKay/David Orchard - 64%


Jim Prentice/Scott Brison - 36%



Time For Ontario to Take a New Conservative Course!

Follow Perth-Middlesex and Gary Schellenberger Now!







Why wait for leaders to tell you what is going to happen? Today you can lead by example and become a member of both the Progressive Conservative Party and the Canadian Alliance. Joint membership is the first step in local riding cooperation and you can have a direct say in the unification of like minded people at the local level. The process is easy. Simply fill out the form below and your request will be processed for either a PC Party, Canadian Alliance or both memberships.

We can build a broader, more inclusive PC Big Tent that includes the West, Quebec and Ontario through cooperation or coalition amongst Canadian Conservatives in the next election against Liberal Paul Martin because it is time to nail down the tent stakes on core conservative values and principles we share with the Alliance like free trade, tax reform, cutting government waste, fostering economic growth and democratic reform. Plus we will go a step further with such ideas as the instituting the death penalty, scrapping the gun registry and stop the legalization of child pornography and its possession. We must share a common set of conservative values and principles to offer Canadians a clear choice in the next election.

Peter MacKay will reach out to all those who share our conservative values and principles. Peter will bring together conservatives from across this country to defeat the Chrétien - Martin Liberals. You can have a direct say in whom will be the next PC Party Leader. You can cast your vote for Peter and elect MacKay delegates from your riding to represent you at the June 1st convention in Toronto. We need your help right now! It’s very simple to join and have a vote. It will take one day in your life to help put Canada back on the right track for the next decade and beyond.

Sign Up Here and Unite the Right Today!



Thank you for your introduction. I am delighted to be here with you this afternoon to talk about the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. Three weeks ago today, the PC Party began its Leadership Convention in Toronto. Five months from now, the Liberals will choose a new leader. Within a year, we will be standing before the public in a general election.

We must lay the groundwork now to maximize the number of Progressive Conservative candidates elected. And as a first step, we must move quickly to heal the natural divisions of the leadership race. Unity begins within the existing family further efforts to unify the larger community will follow.

We came out of the Toronto convention with momentum. The nation is watching. And it has become very clear that our Party has the breadth and depth of talent to put together a winning team. We will take on a tired and arrogant Liberal government, and bring a new generation of leadership to Canada, leadership based on idealism, ideas and action.

Our leadership race showed that we have strength on the ground, the strength of thousands of members of the PC Party who worked tirelessly on behalf of their candidates. Now, at the end of a gruelling campaign, I'm asking everyone to keep up the pace.

To those who supported me during the leadership, I want you to reach out to those in your ridings and networks who supported others.

And to those who supported another candidate, my message is equally simple: I need your help.

Some of you were attracted by Scott Brison's bold and innovative policy agenda. Others believed in Jim Prentice's plan to recreate that broad coalition that took us to 24 Sussex. Some joined the party because of David Orchard's concern for our sovereignty and environment in changing times. Some supported André Bachand as a man who could bridge the country's linguistic divide by articulating a compelling vision with charm and eloquence in both official languages.

All of you who supported any of the candidates worked hard to rebuild this Party. And we need to work together to keep building.

Peu importe le candidat que vous avez appuyé durant la course au leadership, nous devons dès aujourd'hui former une grande équipe. J'ai besoin de l'aide de chacun d'entre vous.


ver the months of campaigning, in debates across this country, I learned a lot from my fellow candidates. I also took to heart lessons that Sir John A. Macdonald taught Canada a long time ago. Sir John A. was a nation builder because he was a coalition builder. He built partnerships that seemed impossible to earlier generations, between English and French; between Protestant and Catholic. Partnerships, as well, with political foes to create Confederation. We forget today just how astonishing these collaborations were in their time.

That is why we, as Progressive Conservatives revere Sir John for what he was able to achieve as a result.

That lesson must be learned by any leader of any political Party that aspires to govern this country. We have built a nation renowned around the world for its pluralism and decency. Any Party that aspires to govern this country must bring together different elements and forge coalitions to drive change.

That is what we have done in the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. What we have always done, and what we will continue to do. It is why we will again earn the trust of Canadians to govern this great nation.

Our efforts to reach out must naturally include the Canadian Alliance. I have initiated several conversations with Steven Harper since being chosen Leader, and will do so again. I am prepared to sit down and discuss policy, and how to work more cooperatively in Parliament, and how to advance the interests of all Canadians.

Mr. Harper has put forward his proposed solution to the challenge of vote splitting in certain ridings. Neither I, nor anyone else, have seen the details of what he proposes.

Given the histories, standings and prospects of our two parties, I believe we must first find common cause and common goals and establish trust before setting out a common electoral strategy. I also believe that we must do this beyond the glare of camera lights, apologies to our friends in the press gallery. If we are to move the issue of future cooperation forward, it cannot be done through the media, we have to first build relationships and then determine next steps.

The first steps are important. Let's take the time to make sure they are the right ones, in the right direction, and in the spirit of true cooperation.

As I have consistently stated throughout our recent leadership campaign, I respect the Partys constitutional aim to run 301 candidates in general elections. And I respect the membership of the Canadian Alliance Party. For these reasons, I look forward to a discussion with Stephen Harper on the views of his party at large on how we can move forward.

The underlying objective of any such discussion is to find a way to offer a better more viable option to the mediocre Chretien Martin agenda.

This afternoon, let me outline three of the policy areas that will loom large in the coming election: economic growth; health care; and a more active presence in the world.

First, economic growth. Im part of the generation that has grown up in the new, global, knowledge-based economy. Ive seen Canada ride its waves and swoop down the troughs.

Even with slowdowns in the United States and Europe, the Canadian economy was performing well. Our success is rooted in the fiscal and trade decisions of the 1980s.

As the Canadian economy slows, it is time to build on the success of past decisions, decisions made by the PC Party of Canada, and prepare for the future.

First, we must build on the very real benefits of free trade to the economic well being of all Canadians.

Let me make myself completely clear on this point. I completely and unequivocally support NAFTA and the Canada U.S. Free Trade Agreement. We created these agreements. It will remain our policy bedrock. the crown jewel.

As I address the Confederation Club, let us remind ourselves the greatest contribution the PC Party has ever made to Canadians was Confederation the national vision that became a reality the 20th Century contribution was free trade.

No other policy initiative in the history of this country has brought about such prosperity and confidence to our economy.

Canadians seized the opportunity presented by liberalized trade with the United States and formed north south trade relations which will benefit our country for generations into the future.

While trade between Canadians and Americans in large and small companies across the continent flourished, the relationship between Jean Chretiens Liberals and the U.S. administration faltered terribly. A directionless and at times outright anti-American Canadian cabinet has reduced the relationship with the American administration to a bitter ideological stand-off. Neither administration trusting each other and neither administration willing to take the political risks necessary to fight domestic protectionist policies.

The difference between us and the Liberals, is that we can make Free Trade better without making our relations with our biggest trading partner worse.

It has been fifteen years since the first Free Trade Agreement was signed. Now is the time to look at our trade policy again. We need to broaden and deepen the application of free trade. We need to expand it beyond this continent to the rest of the Americas and around the globe. This is the ideal time as we head toward the Free Trade of the Americas.

Remember back in 1989? When the FTA was first implemented, some said the Canadian wine industry was doomed. Superior and less expensive U.S. wines would flood the Canadian market, they said. It would lead to wholesale closure of their vineyards.

But look what happened instead. The wine industry in Canada has become a source of pride. The industry looked at the challenges and met them head on. In doing so it created a product that has received international recognition.

There is no question that free trade has been good for Canada. There is no question that better free trade will be better for Canada. Let there be no question that the Progressive Conservative Party will stand solidly behind free trade in the next general election and thereafter.

Tax policy will be a major part of our election platform. Lowering tax rates is simply not enough. Tax policy must be used to encourage productivity and growth.

We must take a candid look at our tax structure. Canada must become a more capital-friendly country. We must work hard to attract more foreign investment. We must encourage Canadian businesses to invest more in productive capacity. The capital tax should be eliminated not in five years, but immediately. It kills jobs. It drains the resources of companies striving to compete. It must go.

Government spending and regulation must face the same scrutiny. Every public dollar spent must go to those essential services Canadians need.

Finally, we must legislate a debt repayment schedule to ease the burden of our excesses on future generations.

The second key policy area is the future of our health care system.

It's time to put an end to the Liberal method of "health care reform by opinion poll." Let's start with the basic belief held by Canadians from coast to coast: universal access to quality health care based on need and not ability to pay. That's the goal. It is not up for negotiation. Period.

The goal is clear. How we achieve it is not. Let us look at the instruments that can make a difference. Let us protect public insurance, and let us be clear about the role private providers can play within that system.

We can protect those provisions of the Canada Health Act that still speak to the core values of the system. We need to modernize the Canada Health Act. We need to account for the rising costs of drugs and homecare, as just one example of what has been changing.

And let's not waste any more time or resources bickering among levels of government. We must work together to solve complex problems. And that means putting an end to the Liberal "Ottawa knows best" approach to federal-provincial relations. It means deciding together on the standards of excellence that shall become hallmark of Canada's health care.

If we want to avoid the federal-provincial standoffs, we need objective evaluative data. There are some excellent ideas up for discussion. In Quebec, for example, Jean Charest's government has proposed a consultative body called the Council of the Federation. One of its roles would be to consider harmonized standards and policies in specific subject areas. At the very least, let us get back to regular federal-provincial meetings and find a more comprehensive way to include the municipal voice.

The bottom line is this: it's time to get over the federal-provincial bickering. And these vehicles could be used to provide independent and objective data on the effectiveness of health care reforms. The result: more informed and effective decisions.

The third policy area I want to talk about briefly is Canada's foreign and defence policy needs.

After ten years of Liberal neglect, increased funding for our military is crucial and it is obvious, painfully obvious that our military needs increased funding. We must rethink the role of our military. What do we want our armed forces to do, both here in Canada and around the world?

How can we balance our two major commitments? On the one hand, a commitment to a strong multilateral system of peace and security through the United Nations. And on the other, our commitment to ensuring stability and security of the continent we share with our closest friend and ally, the United States of America?

I believe we must pursue a triple strategy. First, provide our military with the necessary rapid response and strategic lift capabilities they need if Canada is to remain a UN peacekeeper and peacemaker.

Second, we must pursue negotiations on a North American security perimeter with our American allies. Today, defence is linked with other issues in ways we have not seen before. Our trade with the United States is connected to the security of our borders.

And third, Canada must become more active in promoting the benefits of trade and democracy around the world. We must therefore revamp our system of foreign aid so that it works in conjunction with and not separate from our foreign policy goals.

On these subjects and the issue of policy and party building, I will be announcing in the coming weeks a series of blue ribbon panels that will examine issues related to trade, post-secondary education and the environment. Later in the summer, additional panels will also be announced.

Ladies and gentlemen, dear friends, chers amis, with a government record like this. with nearly a decade of cynicism, arrogance and corruption, it is no wonder that many Canadians now feel jaded about politics and tuning out.

The 2000 election turnout was the lowest ever. I can understand why Canadians feel that way. You can too.

When a Cabinet Minister gets caught with his hands in the kitty, and he is rewarded with an ambassadorship, Canadians get cynical.

When the Prime Minister buys Challengers for his personal comfort, our armed forces are left with helicopters that won't go up and submarines that won't go down, Canadians get cynical.

When the Liberals force through Parliament a bill that changes the rules on Party fund-raising giving themselves $8 million and significant less to the other parties, not bringing about more openness or fairness but simply promoting the incumbent government, Canadians get cynical.

When the Liberals shut down Parliament so the Prime Minister can get off to the golf links early, shut down Parliament in the midst of crises like SARS, and BSE cow, softwood lumber and the insolvency of the national airline, Canadians get cynical.

If we want Canadians to stop being cynical, if we want them to get involved again in the democratic process again, we must prove we can do things differently and provide positive solutions.

And one thing was very clear to anyone who attended the Leadership Convention in Toronto. Our Party is a national institution that brings together Canadians from all regions, from all age groups, and from diverse elements of the policy spectrum.

We now must build on the momentum of the convention. We must translate the enthusiasm of the leadership campaign into a solid election platform. We have a Progressive-Conservative agenda for the next decade: a stronger economy, better health care, and a more active presence in the world. All this will help in the biggest agenda of all, and that's to create a healthier democracy and a prosperous Canada.

Alors, chers amis, voilà le programme progressiste-conservateur pour la prochaine décennie: une économie plus performante, un système de santé revitalisé, une présence plus marquée sur la scène internationale ancrée dans des objectifs plus concrets, et une démocratie renforcée.

Over the next few months, I need each of you to contribute your ideas. How can we turn this agenda into a winning platform? How can we build the party infrastructure that will put these ideas to work for Canadians? How can we unleash the power and the potential we saw at the convention, and use it to drive change for Canada?

We have work to do. So rest up a little this summer. Enjoy the cottage. Enjoy the riding barbecues. And gather your strength and energy. Because we're going to need it. We're in the summer respite of what will surely be one of the most dramatic years in Canadas political history. We'll have an election within a year. We'll face a recycled Liberal leader with a tired old agenda. And we must be good and ready.

Democracy demands it, Canadians deserve it.

I look forward to seeing you out in your communities that make up this glorious country.

Merci.


Members of Parliament and National Councillors, honoured guests, ladies and gentlemen,

It is great to be here this evening. This is my first official Leader's Dinner in the city of Toronto – this is where I grew up.

We have made tremendous strides in our financial situation in the past year. When I took over, this party had over 3 million dollars in bank debt. Today that debt has been entirely eliminated.

Our fundraising last year rose by 55% and will rise again this year. And now we are building our election warchest.

These efforts are going to be helped enormously by the awesome effort that has gone into making this event a success. There are so many people who should be thanked, and I regret I cannot mention them all here.

But please allow Laureen and me to express our sincere gratitude to the three outstanding Canadians who have lent their names to this event as its honourary chairmen – Fred Eaton, Tom Long and Peter Munk.

As well, our special thanks to Linda Frum and Nigel Wright for their tremendous commitment and for the outstanding efforts of their entire organizing committee.

You know, in every election in the past decade, every single pollster in this country, and every single political analyst has tried to write off the Alliance in the province of Ontario. And every single election, this party has not only exceeded expectations, but done even better than the time before.

In 1991, I persuaded the then Executive Council of the Reform Party to look at running candidates in the Province of Ontario. I not only thought this party must be a national party, but as a born and bred Torontonian, I believed that it must have, and could have, success in this part of Canada. And, notwithstanding our disappointments, this party has placed 2nd in Ontario in three consecutive national elections, with its best finish ever here in the last federal election. Under Stockwell Day, this party finished second in 80 ridings in Ontario and captured over 25% of the vote, winning, for the first time ever, 2 seats in this province.

Today this party has more active members in this province than the PCs, for example, have in all of Canada.

This party is united, professional and disciplined in Parliament. Our caucus has led the Opposition debate on every single significant issue to arise in federal politics in the past year. It has done so because we have by far the largest Opposition caucus – the only one in Parliament large enough to form a full shadow cabinet – by far the most experienced – by far the most diverse – and by far, the most talented.

We have started preparations for the election in our new operations office in Ottawa and are already nominating candidates.

And, as I mentioned earlier, with greatly improved fundraising and disciplined internal cost control, we are moving into a very strong financial position, to which tonight's event will add considerably.

It's not our only event. We just came off a successful dinner like this in Calgary, and I will be holding a second, more modest affair this weekend in Leaside where I spent my boyhood. You see, the only downside of this dinner, if I call it that, is that like me if I wasn't your speaker, a lot of my old friends, relatives, and school chums in Toronto couldn't afford to be here tonight.

Believe me, when I look at others, it's a good problem to have.

“Common Cause” Initiative

There is, in short, much good news to review with you tonight – good news that is symbolized by this prestigious event. And I believe the prospects for the next few months are even better.

One obvious reason for this optimism is recent developments within the federal PC party. I am, of course, referring to the election of a new PC leader, the deal with David Orchard, and the outrage which has greeted it.

Because of the Orchard deal, there are many in our party who believe we should write off the federal PCs. There are many in the public who believe that any co-operation between the Alliance and PCs has been killed. That is not my view. I believe that the PCs have been given a choice – a choice between a coalition with David Orchard or a coalition with the Canadian Alliance.

It is obvious that this country needs the CA and genuine PCs to pursue “common cause” – a single slate of candidates against the Liberals in the next federal election. Tonight, I am instructing our party to pursue this “common cause” initiative.

Because of these developments, many in the Canadian Alliance have been urging me to write off the PCs once and for all and to focus my undivided attention on preparing our own party to take on the Liberals in the next federal election. I will admit that the temptation to do that is strong. But, like so many temptations, the error of it would become apparent as soon as it were acted upon.

I understand, as I said repeatedly in last year’s leadership campaign, that my first responsibility is to promote this party and to prepare it to take on all comers in the next federal election. At the same time, promoting this party continues to mean promoting the mission for which this party was founded.

What is that mission? It is to promote a broader opposition challenge to the federal Liberals.

In fact, in 1995, I was, along with Dr. Tom Flanagan, the first in Reform to observe that the broader hopes of the 1993 election were fading, that Canada’s opposition was becoming highly segmented, that Liberal rule would become entrenched, and that, barring some innovative thinking, a long war of attrition among opposition parties lay ahead of us.

Five years later, this party, the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance, was founded as an answer to that problem. Most Reformers and many Progressive Conservatives, and some others as well, decided at the turn of the century to turn a page in history – to turn beyond the narrow partisanship and toward the broader goals of all conservatives.

That is the essence of the word Alliance which defines our party. We cannot forget this goal. We must continue to embrace the vision of uniting all conservatives. In my short tenure as party leader, I have attempted to do that.

In April of last year, shortly after being elected, I met with Joe Clark for this very reason. I offered to expand the then-parliamentary coalition between Joe and some dissident Alliance MPs to include all MPs of both parties. I also insisted that the parties must agree to electoral co-operation to make such a parliamentary arrangement work. Finally, in August, after Joe’s decision to step down as leader, I also offered to hold a joint CA-PC leadership race.

It is true that all these proposals, like the original United Alternative process itself, were rejected by the remaining Progressive Conservatives. And it is also true that the deal with David Orchard appears to present a whole new set of obstacles to co-operation between our parties. It is understandable that many think this could put an end to the matter. Perhaps they are right. But I believe we have been presented an opportunity to create a positive new turning point.

Many Progressive Conservatives have long hoped to rebuild their venerable political organization into the kind of party it once was. The events of recent weeks make it obvious that that is not going to happen. Should the PC party be rebuilt at all, it will be a very different kind of institution. The status quo, even in its most desirable form, has been obliterated. The PC party will be a new kind of coalition. Either it will be a coalition with David Orchard or it will be a coalition with the Canadian Alliance.

I know that we can all marshal arguments about how little sense the Orchard option is going to make to members, to donors, to analysts and to voters. I suggest we let those arguments be made by PCs themselves. Let our efforts be put toward pointing out the positive mutual benefits we can offer each other.

As I have said, we have created a party that is strong and here to stay. It does not diminish us to reach out – to take the initiative to reach out. It is only a reflection of our strength and of our confidence. We must recognize that we need the Tories just as they need us. We need them in the East just as they need us in the West. We need each other in Quebec. And we can only achieve our potential in Ontario – at least if we are to achieve it fully and quickly – if we achieve it together.

And this is what the public wants. It is what conservative voters want. It is what genuine Progressive Conservatives want. They do not want David Orchard’s vision of the PC party – a PC party that exists to fight the Canadian Alliance. They do not want, or need, an “opposition to the opposition”. They want our parties to find “common cause”.

What is that “common cause”? They want our parties to prepare, not to do battle with each other, but to do battle with the Liberal party. They want to see us present a single slate of candidates between our two parties – a group of men and women committed to a genuine conservative alternative for the country.

And why would they not want such an alternative to the Liberals? They see in the Liberals and Paul Martin a party many believe to be endowed with inevitable victory. But they do not see this because of any vision he has for the country, any competence they have for management, or any strength in their team. They see Liberal power only in the country’s political alignment.

So, what do we need to do today to pursue a “common cause” initiative between our parties? I believe former PC Prime Minister Brian Mulroney has identified perhaps the most critical element in all this when he recently told his own party:


“if I were a candidate for the leadership of the Progressive Conservative party, and I were to win the leadership of the party, my first order of business after I had secured the party’s position would be to sit down and to look very objectively and selflessly at this challenge.

“A failure to resolve this matter does not guarantee defeat but its resolution will ensure victory. And that’s what I would be after.”
The real issue, in other words, is leadership – leadership when it counts.

With leadership, the Orchard deal, the so-called “301 Rule”, and all the other factors are not obstacles; they are only complications. Our parliamentary system requires leadership, and the laws of our land give the leaders of our political parties, and the leaders alone, the sole power to decide when and where our parties will field candidates. This cannot be overridden by a party’s private rules, and certainly not held hostage by secret convention deals.

A narrow interpretation of the 301 Rule cannot responsibly trump the widespread desire of the Canadian public, of all conservatives, and of most true Progressive Conservatives, whether still in the PC party, on the sidelines, or already in the Alliance. David Orchard cannot be allowed to have a veto on Canadians’ choices in the next federal election.

You have two new, young leaders in the Canadian Alliance and PC parties. New, young leaders make mistakes. Peter MacKay made a mistake with the Orchard deal, just as I have made mistakes of my own. But new, young leaders have the opportunity to correct those errors and, more importantly, have the opportunity to focus on the possibilities of the future rather than the rivalries of the past.

What the public expects is that Peter and I will be willing to agree to an electoral coalition and, when we do so, to show the leadership necessary to ensure our parliamentary caucuses, our national executives and our grassroots activists follow that lead.

I have spoken to Peter briefly on a number of occasions since the convention. He is, as you can understand, primarily concerned with transition issues. We have agreed to formally meet when such a meeting can be successful. We do not want another meeting held only for the purpose of posturing or just spinning our wheels. In the meantime, I urge you to talk to your colleagues in the PC party about the “common cause” initiative.

I urge you to communicate my view that we need a single slate of candidates in the next federal election, and to enlist the remaining PCs behind that “common cause”. And I urge all of you, members of both our parties, to promote the conditions for that to come to fruition.

Leadership When it Counts

Ladies and gentlemen, I still have to remind you that, with or without the Tories, the need to oppose this Liberal government and to offer an alternative does not go away. The country still needs leadership – leadership when it counts. And it behoves every one of you follow that leadership, not surrender to the Liberals merely because the struggle will be hard.

I did not get back into politics because I ever thought the next election would be easy. I came back into politics for the same reason that I left it in the first place – for the long term, for the future, for my children, Benjamin and Rachel. I left politics to be able to spend some time raising them in a way that matters. I came back to make sure I was raising them in a place that matters.

I am sure that many of you – whether you are raising children or not – are very uneasy about where this country is headed. And you should be. Because Canada should be a much stronger country.

A strong country has tremendous natural endowments. Ours has those, a land blessed with a wealth and diversity of resources without equal. A strong country has the best of humanity. And we have a country that has been populated in only a few generations by people of energy and ambition from all corners of the earth. But a strong country also has a strong national government, and we do not have that.

Obviously I don’t use this term the way the Liberals use it, because they have long bragged that their philosophy is one of a strong national government. But a strong national government isn’t, as Liberals think, one that does a whole lot of things badly and spends a lot of money doing them. A strong national government concentrates effectively on those things that cannot be done by lower levels of government and that should never just be left to the governments of foreign countries.

And if you look at those things today, you understand how weak the national government of Canada really is, and how very dangerous it is for the long-term direction of this country. I need not detail the rapidly declining capacity of our armed forces or our growing impotence on the world stage. I don’t have to explain the shortcomings of monetary policy, the long-term trend of the Canadian dollar, or the failure to complete the Canadian economic union and deal with internal barriers to commerce.

In international trade, immigration, national taxation policy, public security, and the unreformed state of our national political institutions, we see all the same problems.

These are all federal matters – the things we require to have a strong country in the future.

And the weakness of the federal government is reflected in the rising differential between our incomes and those of the United States. We increasingly expect our children to head south for educational or professional opportunities. And we’re not surprised when our parents, if they can afford it, go there for health care.

It was, of course, not always this way, even in my lifetime. Until very recently we had a standard of living, and a Canadian dollar, as high or higher than the American one.

We fought way above our size as a nation in the great conflicts of the last century – not just following the Americans, but more often than not, leading the way. Our taxes were lower and simpler and we understood for which public services they paid. In 1867 our constitution was modern and innovative and exceptionally democratic for its time.

Why have these changes occurred? Almost reflexively we can name any number of policy errors that this country has made under various Liberal governments. But it is about more than errors in policy; it is about a loss of values. We live today in a global economy, yet our government navigates through global hazards without a moral compass.

We saw this in the recent war in Iraq:


When our historic allies in Britain and America went to war against a brutal tyrant and our government sat on the sidelines lobbing insults;

When our own soldiers and sailors found themselves placed in a war zone by a government that had ordered them not to participate;

When our government strutted around the United Nations pretending to broker a big-power compromise as our lone Sea King helicopter plummeted from the sky – as the Liberals squealed that they were as opposed to Saddam as anyone else, but couldn’t bring themselves to end diplomatic relations with him before his head was being dragged around Baghdad square.
Let me just stop right here and say: that is not our Canada. It was an embarrassment, and we will fight to ensure it never happens again.

But can we be surprised that a government which frets over the power of the United States while equivocating on Saddam Hussein shows no particular interest in dealing with criminals and thugs on its own streets, and would rather concentrate its resources on registering duck hunters?

Should we be taken aback that an administration which quarrels with our Allies over how – and whether – to bring medical and other assistance to the Iraqi people also periodically squabbles with its own provinces over health care reform? Are we shocked that a Liberal party opposed to every manner of democratic reform at home subordinates the country’s national interests to the veto of the Security Council – a body on which we don’t even have a seat?

Our Canada would not be defined merely by international process and consensus. We would be guided by our values and work with allies. We believe in freedom, in democracy and in the defining human values of the free and democratic civilization to which we belong.

We do not compare the United Kingdom’s assistance in the liberation of Iraq with Saddam Hussein’s attacks on his own Kurdish population. We do not accept some kind of moral equivalence between attacks meant to destroy the state of Israel and those designed to defend that nation’s right to survive. Most of all, we must get right our most important relationship – our special relationship with our strongest ally, our biggest customer and our closest neighbour – the United States of America.

Yes, the United States is a far bigger and more powerful country, and that can be threatening. Yes, it is sometimes difficult, wrong and unfair in our relationship, especially in some trade disputes. But, at the same time, we share with the United States the same fundamental values in a very dangerous world.

More deeply, we share more common interests in more areas than experienced, perhaps ever, by any two other countries. This special relationship with the world’s largest economy and sole superpower is not some fundamental threat to our country. It is, if accepted confidently and managed correctly, Canada’s greatest asset and source of influence on the world stage.

This is our biggest challenge today, just as the Quebec question was our biggest challenge in the past generation. And the problem today is that the combination of insecurity, resentment and delusion that Quebec separatists brought to their most important relationship – that with the rest of Canada – the Liberals have brought to Canada’s most important relationship – that with the United States. The results have been similar: magnified irritations, unnecessary disputes, drained energies and lost opportunities.

Brian Mulroney had no such Liberal insecurities. Now I know that some aspects of this fact about Mr. Mulroney used to bother Canadians. He could stand there with the giant and act like he somehow belonged. But sometimes that’s how Canada should act. It’s how we got the original free trade deal, that has now become NAFTA, and make no mistake, that is the most important economic policy of this country in the past generation.

That was leadership when it counted. It was a policy that I supported wholeheartedly at the time and still do. It’s a policy that Paul Martin now says he supports, but didn’t when the battle was on – in fact he entered public office to fight the deal. And, of course, David Orchard remains on the other side.

Leadership only matters when it counts. There is no point talking about the importance of good relations with the Americans after our beef is being stopped at the border, when tourists have stopped coming to Toronto, or if we feel our trade threatened and our security uncertain. We need a party that knows when to stand up to the Americans, and when to stand by them.

We need a strong national defence. We need a Canada that stands by its historic allies and its historic values. And we need that leadership when it counts – during the tough times of war – not the free ride of peace.

You will not get that when you need it from Paul Martin. You will not get it under any circumstances from David Orchard. You only get leadership when it counts from the Canadian Alliance.

I could list for you issue after issue – just in the past year – where this has been true. Allow me, however, to just mention three:

When this government brought in, as it did again this year, a budget that massively hiked spending, there was, make no mistake, an alternative. The alternative to massively increasing spending is the real opportunity to significantly cut taxes. This party stood clearly for that alternative. You did not hear that view from Paul Martin when it counted. You will never get it from David Orchard. You only get leadership when it counts from the Canadian Alliance.

Then we have health care. When this federal government finally gave in to some gutsy provincial governments – like the government of Ontario – and signed a health care deal that allows for private delivery of publicly insured services, this party backed it fully and without hesitation. Because, notwithstanding all the Liberal posturing over the years and its demagoguery in the last election, it does not matter who delivers health care, but who can receive it. When it counted on this issue, you got only silence and mixed messages from Paul Martin. You will never hear backing of these reforms from David Orchard. You only get leadership when it counts from the Canadian Alliance.

And the final issue, something of which I am most proud to speak here, in my childhood home of Toronto – the incident around David Ahenakew. You know, with the passing of my father recently, my childhood years are often on my mind, as are all the ways in which my father influenced me. My father grew up in World War II and left me with very strong views on that period of human history.

When David Ahenakew delivered a string of vicious slurs against the Jewish people – more precisely when he seemed to justify the Holocaust – there was, for the first couple of days, an oddly muted response from the usual gurus of political correctness.

I believed that Mr. Ahenakew went beyond what should be acceptable in a free and democratic society, and I called immediately and first for the RCMP to investigate his conduct for violations of the Criminal Code.

We may not, like some, imagine a racist under every rock, but with the Canadian Alliance, you get leadership when it counts.

I am going to conclude tonight by thanking you again, especially the organizers, for this wonderful evening.

I have reminded you tonight that we must still pursue our founding mission, to bring together all conservatives to do battle with the Liberals. I have told you that we will do what we can to put that coalition together. But make no mistake, if we must, the Alliance will fight this battle alone against the Liberals – and we will win. Whether the Tories fight with us or not, we will fight on because, as President Bush so dramatically showed, battles are only fought by coalitions of the willing.

I ask you tonight to support the Canadian Alliance in the next federal election in that kind of a coalition.

God bless you all.


Vote for Peter MacKay at this Canadian Conservative Coalition leadership race poll below for future Tory leaders and make a statement backing MacKay in Tory Leadership Draft and Race 2003 because the Campaign to Elect Peter MacKay and Peter MacKay himself is top to bottom better than David Orchard, Jim Prentice, Scott Brison, Andre Bachand, Craig Chandler or Heward Grafftey and will lead us to victory in 2004! Show your support for Peter MacKay by clicking here to join this TotallyTrueBlueTraditionalTory leadership race forum or here to find ToryDraft.Com's old forum above for future Tory leaders and post a message backing Peter in Tory Leadership Draft and Race 2003

Vote in other party related polls in support of Peter MacKay by clicking on the TotallyTrueBlueTraditionalTory frontpage here then check out ToryDraft.Com's gossip page here, opinion page here and editorial page here to keep up to date on the latest Tory stories.



Three websites that may interest you:

First there is the Peter MacKay for Tory Leader messageboard.

Then second is the Peter MacKay for Tory Leader guestbook.

And third is the Peter MacKay for Tory Leader chatforum.

Five other websites that may also interest you:

First there is the Canadian Conservative Coalition website.

Then second is the Progressive Conservative Tory Draft website.

Third is the Totally Progressive Tory Conservative website.

And fourth is the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance Grassroots website.

Finally fifth is the Free Dominion website.


Copyright © 2003 PM 4 PM All rights reserved.

Email Friends of Peter MacKay
Email PM 4 PM

Supporters of Peter MacKay





This is an independent website that has been set up by the Friends of Peter MacKay and in no way reflects his official campaign and or his official website. The groups, Peter MacKay For Canada, Friends of Peter MacKay and Peter MacKay Canada, hold the viewpoint above and it is not an official Peter MacKay Campaign Team viewpoint and should be reflected as such. The above viewpoint is a statement of personal opinions only and does not necessarily reflect factual situations or events but does make the attempt to shed light upon them. The viewpoint is a statement by the groups, Peter MacKay For Canada, Friends of Peter MacKay and Peter MacKay Canada so that others may know where we stand on the issue of Peter MacKay and his leadership potential within the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. Unauthorized reading or reproduction of this viewpoint is prohibited if illegal under law. Thank you to the Stockwell Day, Jim Silye and Joe Clark campaigns for the use of certain proglang, to the Saint Francis Xavier University Political Science Department, Saint Francis Xavier University Model Parliament, Saint Francis Xavier University Progressive Conservative Campus Club and X Men Football Team for the tonne of school spirit and support and thanks to the Preston Manning and Paul Martin campaigns for the use of the "PM 4 PM" slogan, really, really class!