Global Warming Research Paper
By Mr. Scooter
             Environmentalists and politicians around the world are warning everyone of the dangers of global warming. They say how temperatures are rising, glaciers are melting, and how almost all scientists believe it does exists and is a serious problem. The problem is that those things aren’t happening. UN documents have been doctored and studies indicate results much different than they say are happening. Global warming does not exist.
The future, as we are told, will be 4 degrees warmer and the ocean will be 20 inches higher by the year 2100. (Brignell) The temperature has already started to rise the public is being told. Before the 1970’s, scientists were saying that a new ice age is on its way (Sheerin) Then during the 70’s the scientists started saying that the earth is warming (Sheerin). Environmentalists find a new thing they must protect, the atmosphere. Information they give us is only to help themselves.
                 What we have received from the UN’s IPCC, also known as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is changed and false information (Brignell). The IPCC is the main engine for promoting the global warming scare. “It has become notorious for corrupt practices of changing reports and executive summaries after the participating scientists have approved the documents, only to conform their own political objectives”. (Qtd in Singer) The main example of this is in one of their report on global warming.  In May of 1996, scientist who did research for the report discovered that some important information has disappeared between the final approved version and the printed version. The missing information entirely affected the sense of the report. (Sheerin)  Robert Tracinski, a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute and a columnist for Creators Syndicate, explains it this way. “This is the process by which scientists who don’t agree with the global warming hysteria are trapped into giving their stamp of approval” (Qtd in Global Warming Fraud) Steve, a physicist and officer in the Navy, had this to say about the UN.   “The UN itself seems to ignore any research done to true scientific standards. UN studies are revealing themselves to be in actions of corrupt marketing people with political agenda’s” (Steve).  The IPCC found 13% of Green Peaces’ climate scientists believe global warming is  a consequence of energy use. 17% of members of the meteorological society are a result of green house emissions and burning of fossil fuels (Steve).
            The process the government uses to find the views of the scientific community is one that can make it very easy to alter information.  First, a panel asks scientists to submit their views on subjects, such as global warming, and their views are then spelled out in an enormous report. No one will ever read these reports because of the size and scientific language (Global Warming Fraud).  Since there are no readers, politicians can write a “summary” where they will downplay or eliminate scientific facts that don’t fit their agenda (Global Warming Fraud). Politicians and journalists then only hype the  most “amazing” parts and then attribute those views to anonymous consensus.  (Global Warming Fraud)
               Of the many lies the world has been told, the biggest may be that almost all scientists believe that global warming is a threat. What they meant to say was 2,100 scientists and several Nobel Prize winners signed a petition saying they believe global warming exists and poses as threat  (Brignell). They did not tell everyone that more than  4,000 scientist from over 106 countries including 72 Nobel Prize winners signed the Heidelberg appeal stating that they believe global warming is not a threat and the appeal stated, “Current information is based on scientific criteria and not on irrational preconceptions”. (Qtd in Brignell) 100 prominent scientists including the president of the National Academy of Scientists signed the Leipzig declaration which stated,   “The costly actions undertaken to reduce greenhouse emissions are not justified by the available scientific evidence.” (Qtd in Coe)
                They Kyoto Treaty of 1997 was an agreement to bind participating nations to signicantly reduce emissions of green house gasses. It requires 5% reduction of the 1990 levels by 2012 (Brodbeck).  Developing nations did not have to following these standards because it would hurt them from developing. (Brodbeck) The US did not sign and congress would not ratify it leaving us to be one of the few nations not to sign it.
                Before the signing of the Kyoto Treaty,  an Oregon petition denouncing global warning  received an unprecedented 17,000 signatures from scientists specializing in physics, geophysics, climate science, meteorology, oceanography, chemistry, biology, and biochemistry (Coe).  Dr. S. Fred Singer, president of The Science & Environmental Policy Project, said this about all the hype global warming.
          
           Scientists are understandably upset when they see $2 billion per year             devoted to research on climate change, much it irrelevant and                        concerned only with imaginary consequences of a hypothetical                       warming -- while other fields of science are starved. They are also                  appalled and angry that an increasing fraction of this research money is           diverted into "community workshops," thinly disguised brainwashing               exercises to create public fears about climate catastrophes. (Qtd in                  Singer)

            What about the melting ice glaciers? Well, the West Artic ice sheets, which could lift sea levels up 20ft, aren’t melting. They are actually thickening and Antarctica is getting colder. (Ridenour). UC Santa Cruz and California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory found that ice sheets there have been expanding by 26.8 million tons per year.  The air temperature of Antarctica’s polar deserts declined instead of increased by  0.7 degrees from 1986-1999 (Ridenour).
               How did that icy island Greenland get that name? Greenland got its name from its verdant pastures that attracted Norse settlers under the rule of the famous Viking Eric the Red in 986. (Brignell) They lived there for 300 years on Greenland until the mini ice age occurred when the temperatures dropped for about 200 years and the settlers were driven off by ice covering the island. The same ice that is there today (Brignell). Between 1923-1933, the US experienced an unprecedented heat wave making this period known as the Big Dust Bowl. (Houts) 
               1936 and 1956 set records for an area in the Midwest of days over 90 degrees experienced. It experienced 49 days consecutive above 90 degrees.  In 1992,  the same area experienced 2 consecutive days over 90 degrees and in 1997 there were 5 consecutive days over 90 degrees (There is No Global Warming). The area does not appear to be warming from this information. A team of scientists from NASA and the University of Alabama found that global temperatures have been dropping and not rising over the past 20 years (TenBruggencate). This is the complete opposite of what is supposed to be happening.
                  What causes temperature is the sun goes through cycles. When there are lots of sunspots, it puts out dramatically more energy than when there are a few (TenBruggencate). “During the 15th century when sunspots disappeared there was a mini ice age. Sunspots have increased since then.” (Qtd in Tenbruggencate) What also determine temperature besides the suns output is cloud cover, El Nino, dust in the air, sulfur from volcanic eruptions, and other things (TenBruggencate).
                  Cities are being called an example of how the earth is staying warmer than it has been 140 years ago in the cites compared to the country side. This is a poor example because the heat this can be contributed to the addition of buildings, freeways, houses, streets, and factories that are made of billions of tons of bricks, mortar, stone, tar, concrete, and asphalt that absorb and hold in heat that in collects during the day. (Steve). Environmentalists and some scientists call this global warming when it is the Urban Heat Island Effect.
                Information on global warming has not been presented accurately. The information has been altered and changed to meet the agenda’s of the environmentalists.  Scientists currently aren’t publicly speaking out against global warming, but are still performing experiments and getting evidence that shows there is no warming. Global warming has not shown its presence.  The scientists who had no doubts that the earth was in danger of starting a new ice age only 20 years ago. Can we really believe them?  It will take awhile before more accurate information can come out.  Currently Temperatures are not on the rise and there apparently is nothing to worry about.
Home