Return to the welcome page
New & News
Fair Use Policy
1999
2001
2002
2003
2004
The Fumanor Soundtrack
My Favorites
Techniques
About Me
Contact Me

This section was actually an afterthought. The "Techniques" section covers - or will cover - all sorts of information about how to compose Midis. But what I realised, part way through crafting the website, was that there were a number of technical issues of enough general interest that there should be a section devoted to them. Things like "What is a Midi?" "What affects what I"m hearing when I play a musical Midi?" "Are midis copyrighted?" "What software do you use?" "How do I use a soundfont?" Only two of these topics have been addressed so far, but the others are all planned to be added as time permits. I want this website to be more than just a repository of my works, I want it to be a resource available - and useful - to anyone involved in MIDIs or who might want to be - or who just wants a glimpse behind the curtains.

1. What is a "Midi"?

Midi is actually MIDI - a type of file structure that permits controls for various parameters to be assembled as a file. A "midi" is a file in the format. (In fact, there are a number of variations on the basic format but that's not important right now).

One of the most popular uses for the format is the storage of instructions for a set of synthesisers on a computer's sound card to play tones that mimic a piece of music. But it's important to remember that there is no actual music recorded in the file, only instructions. This confers the advantage of incredibly small file sizes, but there are disadvantages as well - and those lead to the two most common criticisms of midi-format music.
First, as I stated on the home page, 99% of midis are cover versions of variable quality, which leads many to underrate the format's potential. The second complaint is with the level of "reality" in the instruments used. The description "thin" is often used when speaking of midis, and to some extent this criticism is justified. However, what most critics fail to take into account is that the "thin warble of poorly synthesised psuedo-instruments" is at least as much a function of the soundcard and speaker system in use as anything else.
In fact, one of the greatest frustrations for composers who work in the midi format is that no other computer system will play exactly what the composer heard. The notes might be the same but the instruments and their interplay will almost inevitably be different - either a little, or (more commonly), a lot. This is a topic that is more fully addressed on the next page of this section!

A third criticism is that the arrangements are "amateurish". Again, to some extent, this is a justifiable criticism; most of the people doing these ARE amateurs, and so this comment should astonish no-one. Even "professionals" are often not as skilled as perhaps they should be. But, at least part of the problem is that the medium forces composers to take one of two routes, and both lead to inevitable unwarranted criticism. Either the composer aims for the lowest common denomenator, a tune that will sound half-reasonable on most soundcards - an achievement which requires serious skill, but which often means discarding virtually all the nuance and colour that could be put into a piece; or they work hard on optimising the piece for whatever soundcard they happen to use, on which it may sound tremendous - which inevitably means playing with fire so far as any other soundcard is concerned.

And that, without all the technical details, is what MIDI is all about.

Next Topic: Why don't I hear what YOU hear?

To Page 2 of this section