It is ridiculous to say that we have only one or two choices in a given situation. We have as many choices as the imagination can conjure up.
Whatever social system you want for the world, you will probably see it asthe free-est and will describe it accordingly. And you will certainly describe it in noble terms.
Beware of those who would liberate you. They really want you to live their way. And don't we do much the same thing?
Some pretty horribble things have been done by those who claimed -- and no doubt oftenn believed -- they were doing a favor for the oject of their goodness. Thre is, however, one basic criterion for determining if we really are doing someone good: ask him.
Almost any beligerentwill see thoseother people as the realcauseof a conflict, because theyhave gotten inhiis way.
All categories are at the convenience of the categorizer. Beware of then reading your categories into nature.
When one has formed a picture, there is a tendency to feel it is full and complete merely because there is a picture.
In any large random sampling, we might start with the assumption that there will be exceptions to any general rule.
In comparing one group with another, there is a near unavoidable tendency, if we are in any way involved, to compare the good qualities of one with the bad of the other.
Thought, like material objects, has inertia.
Any event is inevitable immediately before it happens. None are so if we go back far enough.
Morality stems from the way a society lives. No society wants to be immoral in its own eyes or will continue so for long. If it won't change its ways, then it will change its philosophy. The same holds true for individuals.
It's easy to tell warring people to behave when you're not yourself threatened. Such an admonition is tantamount to saying one is not emotionally involved in the outcome.
Of course your system would work if everyone followed it. So would everyone else's.
Two curses of mankind: (1) Identity: When we no longer identify ourselves as white, black, American, Russian, Chinese, young, old, rich, poor, Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, atheist, the millennium will have been reached, for how then will we choose up sides to wage war? (2) Superiority: Why can't you just say you're beautiful without then going on to say, "Indeed, far more beautiful than that so-and-so over there"?
There is no such thing as complete objectivity in a human being. Nor is it desirable.
Success and failure are more often than not group ventures.
Character is fate. -- Heraclitus.
Virtually everyone wants good to prevail in this world -- his version of good.
In any two situations and with any two people, there are bound to be some differences and some similarities. We will emphasize whichever suits our purposes.
We attribute our values to God -- naturally.
The human race will have taken one of its most important steps forward when people no longer take advantage of others simply because they can do so.
If a person benefits from another's misfortunes, that doesn't mean he's happy about those misfortunes. Nevertheless, people will tend to protect their vested interests.
We live by patterns implanted in the mind.
When new catastrophes occur, we will not change our whipping boys.
Loyalty and identity can go anywhere.
Every system works for those who like it. It is ridiculous to say that a system works, as though it were true for all people living under it.
We want our way.
Thought picked up from another will almost always be reduced.
Of course they laughed at Fulton. Does that mean everyone laughed at will turn out a Fulton? Of course they considered Socrates dangerous. Does that mean everyone considered dangerous will be vindicated by history?
When it comes to feeling right, it doesn't matter whether we are in the overwhelming majority or the tiniest minority. In either case, we take comfort from our position -- in the former, from knowing we have a lot of company and cannot be too wacky, in the latter from knowing how far advanced beyond others we are.
Everyone tries to satisfy his needs in the best way he knows or can conjure up.
People commonly hope matters will get worse so that they will get better.
Everyone favors an open-minded search for answers -- once his own assumptions are granted.
We suppose our thought to be at dead center in much the same manner that mankind once thought the earth was at dead center of the universe. It will be one of mankind's most significant steps forward when it recognizes that the former is as ridiculous and egotistical as the latter was.
Goodness appears where it appears. So does power.
We reason and act from a ground of influences that are to a large extent beyond our knowledge.
One man's contradiction is another man's logic.
Analogies cannot prove anything since by definition they are different from the point at issue. However, they may be very useful for illustrative purposes.
An offer of good is almost always ambiguous.
Anyone can be provoked into defending himself if you push hard enough.
We commonly arrive at the opposite of our intent.
Virtually everyone wants peace -- on his own terms.
You don't get upset because your neighbor is nasty. You get upset because your neighbor is nasty and you are you. Someone else might have reacted with a shrug of the shoulders.
There are three basic kinds of truth: (1) the self-fulfilling prophecy, those truths that become so by the very act of saying they are so; (2) the self-destroying prophecy, those truths that are rendered untrue by the very act of saying they are so; and (3) those truths not affected by statements. (This was drawn from an article by Garett Hamlin in ETC.)
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you, goes the Golden Rule. But there is a higher law of morality: do unto others as they would have you do unto them.
Predictions are largely meaningless.
In furthering our own values, we will almost naturally (but not invariably) think we are doing the world good.
The human race will almost always move in on a good deal and corrupt it.
Every plan has an unwritten "if this doesn't cost too much" behind it.
Every schismatic feels that his beliefs reflect the true way off the founder.
We look favorably on our own thoughts -- naturally.
We live, see, interpret and judge the world by a certain grid system of values, familiarity, personal temperament and anything else that affects our relation to the world. One's grid system will necessarily seem the best to him, or he wouldn't hold it long (which isn't to say he never violates it or sins by his own standards). But other grid systems might, by an objective view, be just as viable.
Effect is more important than intent.
The first law of human nature is not self-preservation, but protecting oneself from unhappiness. Even the suicide follows that law.
Children grow up thinking their experience is the way off all children growing up. They do so, that is, up to a certain age.
All self-serving statements are suspect.
People will move to meet the criteria by which they are judged and rewarded -- naturally.
Since 1945, has anyone wishing to discredit another not compared his antagonist to the Nazis?
You can't convince an equal adult of anything much.
Beware the person with a one-sentence solution to our problems.
People will commonly yield a small amount of ground so as to gain a larger chunk.
When laws and regulations are lightly enforced or unenforced, it is necessarily the conscientious and sensitive who bear the burden.
All things are possible.
We don't do a very good job of evaluating other people.
Those other guys always look a lot more unified than they really are.
The criminal mind is a self-absorbed mind.
We relate to others with different facets of our personality, naturally.
Don't we all rather feel deep down that we're a better judge of character than other people are?
It isn't where we are that determines happiness so much as the direction we're going.
Sensitivity to one person or group very commonly masks insensitivity to another.
There is no substitute for good people.
When you get done with 10 or 20 or 50 pages of detailing sexual harassment, you still need people of good will and common sense to read and apply those rules.