"The question that must be asked about biological origins is not "Which materialistic scenario will prove adequate?" but "How did life as we know it actually arise on earth?" Since one of the logically appropriate answers to this latter question is that "Life was designed by an intellgent agent that existed before the advent of humans," I believe it is anti-intellectual to exclude the "design hypothesis" without consideration of all the evidence, including the most current evidence, that would support it."    -Stephen C. Myer, PhD and former geo-phsyicist

Viruses, plants, bacteria, and plants are all interrelated. How feasible is this? How feasible is it that plants or even viruses can arise from a "primordial soup"?

Evolutionists, "atheists", several others deny the divine intervention involved in creating a universe of such magnitude. Evolutionists liken it to a deck of cards, the impossibilities of you receiving a given hand. But I ask them, the probabilities of this happening is very low but not as low as life creating life. A worthy comparison would be someone getting the same royal flush of hearts at least one hundred billion times in a row.

Evolution sounds credible to me. If there are any errors, wouldn't they have been revealed already?

Law of biogenesis- Spontaneous generation (the emergence of life from nonliving matter) has never been observed. All observations have shown that life comes only from life.

My history teacher teaches parallels in history, from Louis XIV and Napoleon to Josef Stalin, Sadaam Hussein, and Kim Jong Il. Here, we see generations of many scientists preaching their enigmatic doctrines of science citing evidence only from the works of man, much as the Pharisees of Jesus' time said. Jesus' response to their teachings was simple: "When they went across the lake, the disciples forgot to take bread. "Be careful," Jesus said to them, "Be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees." They discussed with among themselves and said, "It is because we didn't bring any bread." Aware of their discussion, Jesus asked, "You of little faith, why are you talking among yourselves about having no bread? Do you still not understand? Don't you remember the five loaves for the five thousand (men, not including women and children that also ate), and how many basketfuls you gather? Or the seven loaves for the four thousand (men as well) and how many basketfuls you gathered? How is it you don't understand that I was not talking to you about bread? But be on your guard against the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees." -Matthew 16 As you and me know, man is prone to error. As stated earlier, it is estimated that Charles Darwin made assumptions at least 800 times in his book, and after 800 assumptions, the possibility for error is very probable. So we see a group of scientists who preach a method of hypotheses, experiments, and conclusions. Sadly, though data never changes, their hypothoses most often has the ultimate say in their conclusion.

The evolutionists refuse to acknowledge that their was any divine intervention involved bringing about the existence of life as we know it. But how does this explain the fact that their is life, if the law of biogenesis is to hold true? Evolutionists attribute the validity of their doctrine so ad hoc it is at some times laughable. In a sort of irony, they call this abiogenesis (or autogenesis), meaning it brough itself about from dead chemicals, from a "primordial soup" clearly contradicting the fact that life comes only from living organisms and violating their own astute beliefs that one ought to arrive at all conclusions through the scientific method.

I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me, so that from the rising of the sun to the place of its setting men may know there is none besides me (including omnipotent chance) I am the LORD, and there is no other. I form the light and create darknessm I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, the LORD, do all these things. "You heavens above, rain down righteousness; let the clouds shower it down. Let the earth open wide, let salvation spring up, let righteousness grow with it; I, the LORD, have created it. "Woe to him who quarrels with his maker, to him who is but a potsherd among the potsherds on the ground. Does the clay say to the potter, 'What are you making?' Does your work says, 'He has no hands'? Woe to him who says to his father, 'What have you begotten or to his mother, 'What have your brought to birth?' "this is what the LORD says-the Holy One of ISrael, and its Maker: Concerning things to come, do you question me about my children, or give me orders about the work of my hands? It is I who made the earth and created mankind upon it. My own hands stretched out the heavens; I marshalled their starry hosts."   -Isaiah 45: 5-13

So what is wrong with randomness and abiogenesis? As one could assume, all information requires an author to compose it for a definite purpose. For example, this webpage will not accidentally appear on the internet and needs an author working on it [for a long time, too ;)]. Mount Rushmore is clearly not the act of natural erosion. Mozart's 4th symphony does not accidentally write itself and arrange its notes, requiring the intelligent mind of a genius like Mozart.  Now in every hair and every skin cell and every drop of saliva, is contained a book so complex it is akin to the amount of information in a city (not local) library and is fit into a double-helix 2 nanometers in diameter (now that's compression). Groups of the world's most brilliant scientists took around 277 tries to replicate the cells of a sheep (with numerous diseases), and have deemed it impossible with our technologies to do the same to a human or even a primeape (724 tries have all failed). But some can say, there are several other complicated things that can't be replicated like the radio pulses astronmers mistaked for "messages from LGM, little green men." Furthermore, they attribute the great complexity of DNA to the accidental processes of trial and error.The evidence they use to support this is the supposed 'junk' DNA found along side all the other 'useful' DNA, but it has been discovered that all of this junk is written in a certain language unique to itself and performs several functions. Let's try an analogy. If you look at a tree and you see the patterns on the bark, you notice that the bark is in a natural state, but if you see something carved such as "Jesus loves you" then you know it was not an accident, but carved by an intelligent person with the intent of conveying his thoughts. Similarly the language of DNA points to intelligent origins.

So let's say God did create us, but then laid back and willed evolution into occuring (theistic evolution)?

"There is no evidence which would show man developing step by step from lower forms of life. There is nothing to show that man was in any way connected with monkeys... he appeared suddenly and in substantially the same form as he is today... there is no such things as missing links. There is not the slightest evidence that any one of the major groups arose from any other, each is a special animal complex, related more or less closely to all the rest, and appearing therefore as a special and distinct creation."    -Austin H. Clark

One of the most sophistic and fallacious (false) claims made by evolutionists is their claim to the "evolutionary record" found in the fossils. The theory of evolution calls for a slow process of change through mutation and change. For example, you would expect the most 'basic' lifeforms such as worms in the ocean, to slowly progress to their backbone "cousins" fish. However, this gradual process is not found in the fossil record, while the fossil record does show many fossilized back-boned fish, and worms without backbones, but no intermediate.

Nature is rich everywhere with biological designs which defy evolutionary explanation. Certain scientists, faced with these designs, admit that they cannot offer testable or even plausible explanations for the origins of these mysterious biodesigns. For just one example, consider what seems like a miniscule little  microbe, Escherichia coli (which i will call little "E"). Before you go off thinking its a simple life-sucking microbe, think of the complexity of the microbe. It is actually an intenstinal (and sometimes pathogenic) one cell microbe. Each one of these little "E"s has its own unique and fascinating method of mobility. Little "E" propes itself around with six corkscrew propellers which are connected by universal joints to six constant torque, cariable speed, reversible rotary motors! Evolutionary scientists have not the slightest idea how this complex assembly of  interdependent parts could have evolved. Yet, they believe it happened. They have faith in simple atoms. As David says: "Preserve me, O God, for in You I put my trust. O my soul, you have said to the LORD, "You are my Lord, My goodness is nothing apart from You." " -Psalm 116

These systematic gaps in the fossil record mean that every basic type of plant or animal seems to appear suddenly in the fossil-bearing rocks. The fossils speak of sudden appearance of the kings, not the slow, gradual change of one kind into another kind. But this fossil evidence appears more in agreement with special creation than with evolution.

"We know from Moses that the world was not in existence before 6,000 years ago.. He (Moses) calls 'a spade a spade,' i.e., he employs the terms 'day' and 'evening' without allegory, just as we customarily do... we assert that Moses spoke in the literal sense, not allgeorically or figuratively, i.e., that the world, with all its creatures, was created within six days, as the words read. If we do not comprehend the reason for this, let us remain pupils and leave the job of teacher to the Holy Spirit."    -Martin Luther, Lectures on Genesis

"The only alternative to a spontaneous generation is a belief in supernatural creation." "I am convinced that the only way to prevent the total chaos that we are headed for and probably within the next ten years, is to return to God."    -Dr. George Wald, Nobel Prize winner in Phsyiology or Medicine. Member of countess biological societies