Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:06:32 -0700 From: ernesthancock@inficad.com ("Ernest Hancock") Subject: [lpaz-govcom] Fw: Copy of letter to The AZ Republic re Flight Safety and an entertainment facility To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com ("lpaz-govcom@egroups.com"), AZRKBA@asu.edu ("Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Arizona") Reply-To: lpaz-govcom@yahoogroups.com
------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C09F23.64747780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Like I said,... The Football Stadium will go to downtown Phoenix.
I'll beleive that Tempe is the choice AFTER I see land cleared AND foundati on completed.
Just predicting, Ernie
----- Original Message ----- From: TMCMRyan@aol.com To: JBrown9507@aol.com ; contrive@home.com ; legend@goodnet.com ; joeabo@go odnet.com ; wbruno@prodigy.net ; mikeg@goodnet.com ; Kenzo102@aol.com ; ern esthancock@inficad.com ; Bamcknig@syspac.com ; MKBlock@aol.com ; gspellman@ uswest.net ; Sterjp@aol.com ; JKang@amsafe.com ; TracyThomas@home.com ; blu ecrowley@hotmail.com ; dteam31@hotmail.com ; haskellwexler@hotmail.com ; Je tblastAZ@aol.com ; pullenco@ix.netcom.com ; quixote@netzone.com ; rdf@bmol. com ; rhannay@goodnet.com ; RMiller451@aol.com ; tjeffery@uswest.net ; JSem mens@aol.com ; vic@inetport.com Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 7:23 AM Subject: Copy of letter to The AZ Republic re Flight Safety and an entertai nment facility
Dear Editors:
Your (February 25th) editorial concerning the "threats" of Sky Harbor International Airport to Tempe neighborhoods ignores a few truisms. With respect to the placement of the new football stadium to be funded with our
tax dollars, remember: "Safety First!" Also, "Safety is Relative!" And, from what I saw when I joined American Airlines in 1954, the airport (Arizona's gateway to the world) "got there first", long before Tempe amounted to "a hill of beans". As they would have said when the population
of Phoenix was less than 100,000, planning to put an entertainment facility
at the end of the grass runway would be "a hell of a way to run a railroad" .
Just because the FAA might approve a new 200-foot tall structure to be buil t in the path of planes taking off in an eastbound direction does not ameliorate concerns that it will be a dangerous situation. Both British Airways and Lufthansa will be operating jumbo jets non-stop from PHX to Europe. Their planes will be taking off at near maximum FAA-approved take-off weights during Europe's peak tourism season when the air temperatures around Phoenix are in the triple digits - all near-the-limit factors existing at the same time. It is the combination of factors that compromises safety. So, why tempt fate when you know the FAA has set their
airport obstacle standard for normal conditions?
Summer temperatures in Phoenix are not normal. Six thousand mile non-stop
flights, fully-loaded with passengers on any Phoenix summer day are what we
want to see for our economy. However, in the context of the "200-foot standard" set by the FAA for every location - worldwide - it is not a norma l, safe decision to plan for a 200-foot entertainment facility directly in the
take-off path.
Should a twin-engine jumbo jet lose one engine during a very hot day, there
is a great risk that the combined circumstances would kill 500 people. Why
tempt fate? The behavior of our Arizona planners is not like putting troll ey car tracks in the middle of busy streets to kill one pedestrian at a time.
The plan to put the 67,000 seat entertainment facility in the path of millions of air travelers should be changed. A stitch in time might save thousands.=20=20
So, dear Editors, please print these observations in paper. The life you save may be your own.
Sincerely,
Joseph B. Ryan 13311 Paintbrush Drive Sun City West, AZ 85375
(623) 584-3300 February 25, 2001