Field Exam List -- Anarchism and Literary Theory

Jesse Cohn/David Bartine


One focus of the academic feud between marxist and postmodern or poststructuralist theorists is the issue of representation. Marxists like Georg Lukács, Ernst Bloch, and Frederic Jameson have said that literary texts do represent the world -- not (as had been claimed by representatives of the humanist traditions) in the sense of any simple mimesis, but in complex, ideologically-charged ways. New radical skeptics like Jacques Derrida and Jean-François Lyotard have argued that all representation is misrepresentation, even that there is no "world" (as object or totality) to represent. Feminist theorists, meanwhile, have taken a variety of positions on the issue, some of which take the work of marxists like Macherey or Lukacs as starting points, and some of which are inspired by postmodern or poststructuralist approaches. This feud has thus far hardly involved anarchists, who are scarcely represented in the academy (although in the discourses of literary theory the words "anarchist" and "anarchy" are occasionally brandished as symbols or hurled as epithets, there is no widely-recognized discourse that could be called "anarchist literary theory"), and who have historically involved themselves with literary questions far less often than their marxist or feminist counterparts -- indeed, only sporadically. How might anarchist literary theory position itself with regard to this issue, in relation to these interlocutors? Drawing on many of the texts from this list (and on other critical or literary texts as necessary), write 20 pages in pursuit of (but not necessarily in answer to) this question.